Skip to content

are there errors in little and big endianness' description in asm_2.md? #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
just-wasted opened this issue Apr 17, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@just-wasted
Copy link

just-wasted commented Apr 17, 2025

Hi,
thanks for this awesome course!

In the tables ordering the bytes for big and little endianness, shouldn't 0x56 0xAA be swapped? Also what do think about using other numbers to minimize confusion. For example wikipedia uses 0x0A to 0x0D which is better readable.

Thank you :)

Edit: oh i think i confused my self, there are no errors. could the description be improved to clarify that the four bytes are part of one data structure, for example an integer? I made the mistake of assuming those where just 4 random bytes.

@0xAX
Copy link
Owner

0xAX commented Apr 17, 2025

@just-wasted thank you for the issue. I'll re-check on weekends.

@0xAX
Copy link
Owner

0xAX commented Apr 18, 2025

@just-wasted I created #45. Hope it reads better now.

@0xAX
Copy link
Owner

0xAX commented Apr 24, 2025

Since #45 is merged I am closing the issue.

@0xAX 0xAX closed this as completed Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants