You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the tables ordering the bytes for big and little endianness, shouldn't 0x56 0xAA be swapped? Also what do think about using other numbers to minimize confusion. For example wikipedia uses 0x0A to 0x0D which is better readable.
Thank you :)
Edit: oh i think i confused my self, there are no errors. could the description be improved to clarify that the four bytes are part of one data structure, for example an integer? I made the mistake of assuming those where just 4 random bytes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
thanks for this awesome course!
In the tables ordering the bytes for big and little endianness, shouldn't 0x56 0xAA be swapped? Also what do think about using other numbers to minimize confusion. For example wikipedia uses 0x0A to 0x0D which is better readable.
Thank you :)
Edit: oh i think i confused my self, there are no errors. could the description be improved to clarify that the four bytes are part of one data structure, for example an integer? I made the mistake of assuming those where just 4 random bytes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: