-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About regularization loss #21
Comments
We expect regularization to help. If it's not available, it might be worth
trying to train with more frames. See figure 1-13d of my thesis(
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/122560) where we trained the network
on not just 2-frame, but with 5-frame sequence as input.
…On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 1:46 AM shoukna ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
In the paper, regularization is used to drive the separation of the
texture and the shape representations.
I'm doing a similar work, but I don't have frameC to do regularization. If
there is no regularization, will the separation result be poor? And are
there other alternatives to regularization?
Thank you~
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#21>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANUQV7R5KFUM7ACFQPXUGLTMT27DANCNFSM44MPTMTQ>
.
|
Thank a lot! |
Hii just elaborating the steps would be enough, I am not able to clearly understand the given tutorial. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
In the paper, regularization is used to drive the separation of the texture and the shape representations.
I'm doing a similar work, but I don't have frameC to do regularization. If there is no regularization, will the separation result be poor? And are there other alternatives to regularization?
Thank you~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: