Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider archiving this repository #18

Open
aidanheerdegen opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #21
Open

Consider archiving this repository #18

aidanheerdegen opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #21
Assignees
@CodeGat

Comments

@aidanheerdegen
Copy link
Member

This repo is no longer required, as the BGC variant of ACCESS-OM2 is now available as a runtime configuration through the use of generic tracers in ACCESS-OM2.

This should be documented in the README, and then we should consider archiving this repository.
@CodeGat CodeGat self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@CodeGat
Copy link
Member

CodeGat commented Jan 29, 2025

Happy to do this. Are the generic tracers incorporated into ACCESS-OM2 at the moment?

@CodeGat CodeGat linked a pull request Jan 29, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
@aidanheerdegen
Copy link
Member Author

We don't yet have an ACCESS-OM2 release with generic tracers. Until we do we'll keep this repo active and updated with infrastructure changes.

@anton-seaice
Copy link

We also don't have an ACCESS-OM2 with sea-ice bgc. There is not much demand for it, so I think archiving this repository is ok, given it could be un-archived, and assuming the released models are not deleted yet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@CodeGat CodeGat

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

README.md: Add archive message, fix formatting ACCESS-NRI/ACCESS-OM2-BGC
3 participants
@aidanheerdegen @CodeGat @anton-seaice