Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG]: Negativ values in load_mean_adjusted #428

Open
XHalamaX opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

[BUG]: Negativ values in load_mean_adjusted #428

XHalamaX opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@XHalamaX
Copy link

Describe the issue:

I get incorrect values from the load prediction (load_mean_adjusted)

I put these values to /v1/measurement/data
payload_load_measurement.json

Then I verfiied that the data is in the system (now there are already some more data than in the file above) via /v1/measurement/series?key=measurement_load0_mr (all other loadx are empty)
measurement_export.json

I get a negativ load prediction via /v1/prediction/list?key=load_mean_adjusted
load_prediction.json

Reproduceable code example:

Error message:

Version information:

f09658578a9898dd29eecafe3ddaf99fc3677c29
running via docker

@XHalamaX XHalamaX added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 27, 2025
@b0661
Copy link
Collaborator

b0661 commented Jan 28, 2025

Thank you for the detailed information. We will have a look into it.

@XHalamaX
Copy link
Author

It was the missing loadakkudoktor_year_energy configuration...

Sorry...this one I added via the API and if was gone after a restart. But maybe we should find out what the realistic minimum value is or deactivate load_total_adjusted when loadakkudoktor_year_energy is 0 or too low

@XHalamaX
Copy link
Author

Did some more tests and now I have the issue again. So the missing loadakkudoktor_year_energy was not the problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants