-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Project Roadmap / Call for maintainers #535
Comments
The state is that I asked for a new maintainer and nobody really reached out to me yet. I'm not aware of any alternative besides using a "normal" (ie non razor) templating engine |
I used this in a project late 2017, loved it. I'm getting ready to do another. Is there any update to the project status? Maintainers, etc....? |
Project status is still the same. As @matthid alluded to, there is still an open call for maintainers. I stepped back from the project a couple of years ago, and Matthias has been maintaining it since. But life has a way of shifting priorities. RazorEngine has been round for years now and is pretty stable, but where it sits in the new .NET Standard/Core world I dont really know given that Microsoft have made considerable changes to Razor so perhaps a new project, designed from the ground up to take advantage of the newer Razor framework would be a possibility. That could be interesting. In addition, I have experimented with a Handlebars flavour text templating solution (https://github.com/Antaris/FuManchu) but it's not that mature yet |
I have used this library since 2016 (MVC app) to process tons of emails. Its currently still in use in our production environment under decent loads. I have templates in db/disk/in memory. The project is pretty stable as is (although I am on an older version). What requirements are needed to become a maintainer of the project? |
I'm looking at using RazorEngine for email templates in a non Asp.Net project, but this repository seems dead at the moment. Is this repository still active, or is there an alternative that I should be looking at?
@Antaris @matthid
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: