In the folder, we created comparable figures using PyMOL-advance that are similar to the selected figures of the published papers.
Figure 1 in the following publication: Corbi-Verge, C., & Kim, P. M. (2016). Motif mediated protein-protein interactions as drug targets. Cell Communication and Signaling, 14(1), 1-12.
The comparable results are:
| expected figure | designed figure |
|
|
And the default outputs are:
| 1AY7 | 1F34 | 1YCR |
|
|
|
Figure 3 in the following publication: Yang, J., Anishchenko, I., Park, H., Peng, Z., Ovchinnikov, S., & Baker, D. (2020). Improved protein structure prediction using predicted interresidue orientations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(3), 1496-1503.
The comparable results are:
| expected figure | designed figure |
|
|
And the default outputs are:
| T0950 | Predict |
|
|
Figure 1 in the following publication: Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., ... & Rives, A. (2023). Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science, 379(6637), 1123-1130.
The comparable results are:
| expected figure | designed figure |
|
|
And the default outputs are:
| 7QQA | Predict |
|
|
We also provide a clearer one:
.png){kind=spacer}
Figure 1b in the following publication: Zhu, X., Qian, Y., Li, X., Xu, Z., Xia, R., Wang, N., ... & He, Y. (2022). Structural basis of adhesion GPCR GPR110 activation by stalk peptide and G-proteins coupling. Nature Communications, 13(1), 5513.
The comparable results are:
| expected figure | designed figure |
|
|
And the default outputs are:
| GPR110Gq | GPR110Gs | GPR110G12 | GPR110G13 | GPR110Gi |
|
|
|
|
|