rb005-general-power-of-attorney.md

[michelleludovici1]

line 43: The scope needs to be more defined: PoA and mandates are different. I suggest that the rb is about a specific PoA (the EU PoA as defined in the Company Law Directive), not mandates in general.

line 49: the definition in our context (eIDAS 2.0) should probably also explain that we handle digital PoAs. This means, in order to be useful, the term PoA should not only be conceptually defined, but also as an artifact, such as some form of "record" (neutral) if you don't want to specify that they are in form of "attestation".

line 51 first sentence: "Extend" to me means that the PoA model inherits/reuses some objects from the Signatory Rights model? If you mean this, I don't agree that PoA "extends" Signatory Rights (not even from a model point of view). That is since you can conceptualize a PoA without any mention of signatory rights, especially in the concepts. But then I also don't agree with the definition of Signatory rights in rb-002-full-signatory-rights.md
Since you have not defined the scope of this PoA rulebook to only be about legal persons, I have to point out that "signatory rights" as defined in rb-002-full-signatory-rights.md don't even exist for natural persons. Since this PoA rulebook can be for natural persons as well (not limited in scope), there you have another reason why PoA does not "extend" Signatory rights.

line 51 third sentence: leave the sentence out since it is not understandable. For example a person can also be a legal person and then the sentence "legal person is in a role of representing an organisation" does not make any sense.

line 53-56: what is the essence you are trying to explain? That there are many synonyms to mandator and mandatee? In that case make it more clear and use abstract synonyms such as "representative" and "representee", or "grantor" and "agent". Now you mix abstract terms with concrete examples of those abstract terms which is confusing.

line 58: You can use the terms mandator and mandatee in a PoA, but it should be clear that the scope of the PoA rulebook is a PoA and not mandates!