You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is devoted to documenting the effect of upwinding parameters on the cylinder runs (also as a test of video uploads in github issues). Feel free to comment below and close the issue when discussion is complete.
Testing alpha_upw
For both the grid0 and grid1 case, the alpha_upw parameter was varied for the velocity component only, and values of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.667, and 1.0 were tried:
The turbulent_ke and specific_dissipation_rate were always set to 1.0.
The results show that for alpha_upw>0, the Cd results are relatively consistent, while no upwinding with alpha_upw=0 leads to an outlier result.
For the grid0 case
Flow artifacts near the cylinder were seen in the alpha_upw=0 case
which are not seen for alpha_upw=1
or for alpha_upw=0.25
The Cp distribution is also similar between alpha_upw=0.25 and 1.0: plotCp
whereas the Cp distribution for alpha_upw=0.0 is obviously different: plotCp
Testing upw_factor
A similar study was done on the upw_factor. The velocity component of upw_factor was set to 0 for alpha_upw values of 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.667, and 1.0 for the grid0 case:
This issue is devoted to documenting the effect of upwinding parameters on the cylinder runs (also as a test of video uploads in github issues). Feel free to comment below and close the issue when discussion is complete.
Testing
alpha_upw
For both the
grid0
andgrid1
case, thealpha_upw
parameter was varied for the velocity component only, and values of 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.667, and 1.0 were tried:The
turbulent_ke
andspecific_dissipation_rate
were always set to 1.0.The results show that for

alpha_upw
>0, the Cd results are relatively consistent, while no upwinding withalpha_upw=0
leads to an outlier result.For the grid0 case
For the grid1 case:

Flow artifacts near the cylinder were seen in the


alpha_upw
=0 casewhich are not seen for


alpha_upw
=1or for


alpha_upw
=0.25The Cp distribution is also similar between

alpha_upw
=0.25 and 1.0:plotCp
whereas the Cp distribution for

alpha_upw
=0.0 is obviously different:plotCp
Testing
upw_factor
A similar study was done on the
upw_factor
. The velocity component ofupw_factor
was set to 0 foralpha_upw
values of 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.667, and 1.0 for thegrid0
case:and for
grid1
,upw_factor=0
was tested withalpha_upw=1
.The drag comparison with

upw_factor=0
also shows a wide variationplotForcesUPWFactordiff_grid0.ipynb
And is similar to the results for the grid1 case
The wake behind the cylinder is also dramatically different for

upw_factor=0
Snapshot_cylinder_run07_iter140_closeup.png
with a corresponding mismatch in the Cp distribution:

The far-field behavior for the grid0 case with

alpha_upw
=0 andupw_factor
=0 is also suspicious:The unsteady wake behavior for
upw_factor
=0 is also much different compared to theupw_factor
=1 casecylgrid1new_sst_iddes_Re8p0M_run07_upwfactor0_closeup.mp4
cylgrid1new_sst_iddes_Re8p0M_run01_alphaupw1_closeup.mp4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: