Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to be able to identify probes with low variation #1

Open
nhrigby opened this issue Oct 22, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Need to be able to identify probes with low variation #1

nhrigby opened this issue Oct 22, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@nhrigby
Copy link
Contributor

nhrigby commented Oct 22, 2018

Per discussion with @rhiever:
We need a function that identifies probes with low variation among samples, as low variation probes will not be informative downstream.

TBD:

  1. What metric do we want to use to examine variation? Beta values?
  2. What should the cutoff be for low variation probes? I think we should have some default value, but allow users to specify custom value as well. We can probably use processed samples thus far to help determine appropriate cutoff.
  3. Do we want the function to simply return a list/table of low variation probes with their MSE?
@nhrigby nhrigby self-assigned this Oct 22, 2018
@brianchengithub
Copy link

  1. Beta values is fine.
  2. <5% variation could be default. But letting user specify is good.
  3. Let's provide a list as part of our set of QC tables/figures.

@marcmaxson
Copy link
Contributor

easily implemented, determine the threshold for cutoff based on a bunch of public data sets.

removing low variation probes is important for prediction, but less important for other science apps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants