Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configurable ender quarry RF storage #446

Merged

Conversation

Midnight145
Copy link
Contributor

@Midnight145 Midnight145 commented Dec 8, 2024

This removes the need for GTNH's modified version of EU2, where the only changes between the modified version and release are a mitigation for one of the dupes fixed in #438, and to modify the Ender Quarry's storage (set to 200,000,000 instead of 10,000,000).

Currently, it adds one new config option, and you can set the option to 0 to disable it. It defaults to the original value of 10,000,000 instead of the modified version currently in GTNH.

@Midnight145
Copy link
Contributor Author

i hate spotless so much

@chochem chochem requested a review from a team December 9, 2024 18:41
@Midnight145
Copy link
Contributor Author

(Briefly talked about this on Discord)
Unsure if this is best placed in hodgepodge or somewhere else, as this is more of a balance change than a bugfix, feel free to redirect me to somewhere else if it should go there instead.

@Midnight145 Midnight145 force-pushed the enderquarry_configstorage branch from ef3e3d7 to 50bcafb Compare December 10, 2024 09:29
@Midnight145 Midnight145 requested a review from wlhlm December 10, 2024 09:45
@Dream-Master Dream-Master enabled auto-merge (squash) December 10, 2024 09:46
@Dream-Master Dream-Master merged commit e12c6d8 into GTNewHorizons:master Dec 10, 2024
1 check passed
Dream-Master pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Co-authored-by: Wilhelm Schuster <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robertz <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit e12c6d8)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants