You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First time I've seen this article, looks good apart from missing a vital diode to prevent the possibility of a Back EMF pulse causing component damage.
I would suggest using either a 1n4148 or 1n5187 across the fan Diode cathode ( the end with the stripe ) to the + of the fan, and the Anode to the - of the fan.
There is a case for using a MOV for this purpose, but maybe not worth going into for this
The only divergence is re:the appropriate diode, why did you suggest a 1N4148/1N5187 instead of a more common 1N400x? I compared their specs and it seems the main difference is their respective speeds (faster on the 1N5187); IIUTC, the diode's function in this is to short-out the back EMF pulse, thereby killing it before it reaches the RPi pins; is it important that it´s done quicker than a general diode would? And in fact, the Wikipedia page for the 1N400x even mentions that "they are commonly used [...] as freewheeling diodes to protect circuits from inductive loads".
So, is a 1N4148/1N5187 really necessary, or can one use a 1N400x without negative effects?
First time I've seen this article, looks good apart from missing a vital diode to prevent the possibility of a Back EMF pulse causing component damage.
I would suggest using either a 1n4148 or 1n5187 across the fan Diode cathode ( the end with the stripe ) to the + of the fan, and the Anode to the - of the fan.
There is a case for using a MOV for this purpose, but maybe not worth going into for this
Ref : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction
This fly-back diode should be used when switching any inductive load ( iron bar through coil of wire induces current )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: