You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are no terms in hydra's RDF representation that are using OWL (excluding the ontology itself).
I don't see any benefits from using owl:ObjectProperty. Still, we could add a @type: "@id" to the hydra's context that can be referenced by other - it should work fine for JSON-LD
Ok, thanks guys. I forgot that those terms are not RDFS.
About "@type": "@id", it will help simplify JSON structure but if the server is using other serialisation format then it does not shield them from pushing literal accidentally where a URI is expected.
I notice that hydra:Link is defined as a Property.
I does not make sense that a link triple has a literal object. I think that
hydra:Link
should be changed so that it's anObjectProperty
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: