Skip to content

Commit bdbb48c

Browse files
committed
New translations en.json (Chinese Simplified)
[ci skip] Signed-off-by: Björn Kimminich <[email protected]>
1 parent 33f8cff commit bdbb48c

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

data/static/i18n/zh_CN.json

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@
433433
"Manually encoding the angular brackets of the HTML tags does not add any security. It is likely to break descriptions with legitimate HTML tags for styling or links, though.": "对HTML标签的角括号进行手动编码并不会增加任何安全性。而且,它很可能会破坏具有合法HTML标签的样式或链接的描述。",
434434
"The removed code block deals with handling of different screen sizes and is entirely unrelated to the given XSS vulnerability.": "被移除的代码块涉及不同屏幕尺寸的处理,与给定的XSS漏洞完全没有关系。",
435435
"Using bypassSecurityTrustScript() instead of bypassSecurityTrustHtml() changes the context for which input sanitization is bypassed. If at all, this switch might only accidentally keep XSS prevention intact.": "使用bypassSecurityTrustScript()而不是bypassSecurityTrustHtml()可以改变绕过输入过滤的内容。如果有的话,这个开关可能只是意外地保持了XSS预防的完整性。",
436-
"Removing the bypass of sanitization entirely is the best way to fix the XSS vulnerability here. It should be noted, that XSS is only a consequence of broken authorization in this case, as users should not be allowed to change product descriptions in the first place.": "Removing the bypass of sanitization entirely is the best way to fix the XSS vulnerability here. It should be noted, that XSS is only a consequence of broken authorization in this case, as users should not be allowed to change product descriptions in the first place.",
436+
"Removing the bypass of sanitization entirely is the best way to fix the XSS vulnerability here. It should be noted, that XSS is only a consequence of broken authorization in this case, as users should not be allowed to change product descriptions in the first place.": "完全移除过滤绕过是修复 XSS 漏洞的最佳方法。应该注意的是,在这种情况下,XSS 只是授权被破坏的后果,因为用户首先就不应该被允许更改产品描述。",
437437
"To find the culprit lines, you need to understand how MongoDB handles updating records.": "为了找到罪魁祸首行,你需要了解MongoDB如何处理更新记录。",
438438
"Did you notice that the developers retrieved a reference to the user but never actually use it for anything? This might be part of the problem.": "你是否注意到,开发人员获取了对用户的引用,但从未实际使用它做任何事情?这可能是问题的一部分。",
439439
"Another problematic line you need to select, is actually missing something that ties the user to the review.": "你需要选择的另一个问题行,实际上是缺少一些将用户与评论联系起来的东西。",

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)