Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify switching logic for solvers #3420

Open
schillic opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Unify switching logic for solvers #3420

schillic opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
refactoring 🔧 Internal code changes, typically no impact on API simplification 👶 Simplifies code

Comments

@schillic
Copy link
Member

schillic commented Jan 5, 2024

In #3418 we added the same switching logic for SDP solvers as we already used for exponential backends. Maybe a common pattern can be extracted and outsourced.

We also discussed that one may want to go from just symbols to structs in order to pass options to the default solver. But this should only be done if there is a benefit.

@schillic schillic added simplification 👶 Simplifies code refactoring 🔧 Internal code changes, typically no impact on API labels Jan 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactoring 🔧 Internal code changes, typically no impact on API simplification 👶 Simplifies code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant