Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docker error: Cannot destroy container #220

Open
mhecker opened this issue Nov 20, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

docker error: Cannot destroy container #220

mhecker opened this issue Nov 20, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@mhecker
Copy link
Contributor

mhecker commented Nov 20, 2015

sometimes (especially: when "running all checkers" from the admin menu), some checkers fail with errors like

time="2015-11-10T17:29:03+01:00" level="fatal" msg="Error response from daemon: Cannot destroy container 049cca54561b16728c3778c8816df353c91caf564e1f5b5ca49a32a7a6927df1: Driver aufs failed to remove root filesystem 049cca54561b16728c3778c8816df353c91caf564e1f5b5ca49a32a7a6927df1: rename /var/lib/docker/aufs/diff/049cca54561b16728c3778c8816df353c91caf564e1f5b5ca49a32a7a6927df1 /var/lib/docker/aufs/diff/049cca54561b16728c3778c8816df353c91caf564e1f5b5ca49a32a7a6927df1-removing: device or resource busy

as @nomeata mentioned, this may be related to moby/moby#9665

@mhecker
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhecker commented Nov 20, 2015

until we can fix this, a work-around may be using the functionality added in b7ff4a6

@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor

nomeata commented Dec 15, 2015

There is a possibly related issue at moby/moby#3968 (comment) that is reported to be fixed with Linux 3.19. Maybe we should upgrade the host machine soon.

@nomeata
Copy link
Contributor

nomeata commented Dec 15, 2015

...but others disagree.

@ifrh
Copy link
Contributor

ifrh commented Jan 22, 2022

I vote for closing this bug after mentioning the needed Linux Kernel version in README.md .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants