You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here, to me (as really not MS person) it looks like PR309083 and PR309084 are more similar in spectrum and retention time, than PR309083 is with PR309087. So, I guess even if 83 and 84 would not be the same structure, 83 and 87 should not be either.
However, it can be I miss here something. For example, missing stereo-chemistry annotation which leads to the different retention times and was maybe out of scope of the experiments. However, even than the spectra might should look more similar?
Best regards,
Eric
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I stumbled over something that looks to me like a structure miss-annotation in a few RIKEN records.
PR309083
PR309084
PR309087
Here, to me (as really not MS person) it looks like PR309083 and PR309084 are more similar in spectrum and retention time, than PR309083 is with PR309087. So, I guess even if 83 and 84 would not be the same structure, 83 and 87 should not be either.
However, it can be I miss here something. For example, missing stereo-chemistry annotation which leads to the different retention times and was maybe out of scope of the experiments. However, even than the spectra might should look more similar?
Best regards,
Eric
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: