-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing/wrong Rating meta? #100
Comments
@KeyboardRage - better late than never: The difference from the different programs comes from how they merge and prioritize overlapping tags from different exif sections. If you want full control, you should avoid merging.
In your particular case, the answer lies in the fact that there is both an exif-ifd0 rating and an xmp rating:
With exifr, you get this (abbreviated by manually removing all non-rating data):
These were my exifr options:
|
@grasdk Hey, yes better than never 😄 |
I'm trying to use this tool to read ratings of images, but there seems to be a big discrepancy I can't figure out where different Exif readers and programs shows different results.
I've attached an image used for the following results:
.parse(file, true)
to JSON file):I am not quite sure which one to go with here, but there seem to be some information differences. I tested on a different computer for both Explorer and Adobe Bridge to try to rule out cache as much as possible, and there are no hidden sidecar files either.
Image used for these results
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: