Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unfrozen apps filter #1423

Open
3 tasks done
Ahplla opened this issue Aug 4, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks done

Unfrozen apps filter #1423

Ahplla opened this issue Aug 4, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Feature New feature or request

Comments

@Ahplla
Copy link

Ahplla commented Aug 4, 2024

Please check before submitting an issue

  • I am using the latest version of App Manager
  • I have searched the issues and haven't found anything relevant
  • I have read the docs

Describe a description of the new feature

Filter option to show only NOT frozen app.

InShot_20240804_065555280

Describe the solution you'd like

When you activate the unfrozen apps filter, only non-frozen apps will be shown.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

Since the first versions of this wonderful app, I have felt false about this filter. And for people like me, who have many frozen apps, perform actions where we only need to select NOT frozen becomes tortuous and complex

@Ahplla Ahplla added the Feature New feature or request label Aug 4, 2024
@warduweram
Copy link

This feature would be very much welcome.

@jcfyre
Copy link

jcfyre commented Oct 13, 2024

It would be nice to have a selectable option (like how reverse sort is) to disclude rather than include the selected filter. Obviously, there'd be some redundancies since "not user apps" would mean "system apps" and "not system" would mean "user apps," but for other options, this would allow even more filter control.

@MuntashirAkon
Copy link
Owner

It would be nice to have a selectable option (like how reverse sort is) to disclude rather than include the selected filter. Obviously, there'd be some redundancies since "not user apps" would mean "system apps" and "not system" would mean "user apps," but for other options, this would allow even more filter control.

I've a different plan for it. You can try the experimental Finder feature (#321) in the debug variants to get an idea of the future of filters in App Manager. (TL;DR: It'll be very thorough.)

@Ahplla
Copy link
Author

Ahplla commented Oct 13, 2024

I've a different plan for it. You can try the experimental Finder feature (#321) in the debug variants to get an idea of the future of filters in App Manager. (TL;DR: It'll be very thorough.)

I don't know if adding additional steps to do the same thing we do currently is the best way to go. Selecting filters by visible labels is so fluid and simple.

@MuntashirAkon
Copy link
Owner

I've a different plan for it. You can try the experimental Finder feature (#321) in the debug variants to get an idea of the future of filters in App Manager. (TL;DR: It'll be very thorough.)

I don't know if adding additional steps to do the same thing we do currently is the best way to go. Selecting filters by visible labels is so fluid and simple.

There will always be presets. Adding flexibility allows users to import/export/share/customize presets which is more useful than the current mechanism. Also, inverse filtering would only make sense under such circumstances.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants