You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, c.parallel contains copies of some of the tuning parameters of CUB algorithms, and uses those copies. This is unsustainable; for simpler algorithms it doesn't take much code, but for, say, RadixSort, this would be a massive block of logic. Additionally, maintaining it in two places means we can create accidental differences between the two.
The code from CUB should be directly (albeit through nvrtc) reused in c.parallel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, c.parallel contains copies of some of the tuning parameters of CUB algorithms, and uses those copies. This is unsustainable; for simpler algorithms it doesn't take much code, but for, say, RadixSort, this would be a massive block of logic. Additionally, maintaining it in two places means we can create accidental differences between the two.
The code from CUB should be directly (albeit through nvrtc) reused in c.parallel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: