Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please consider making a release #177

Open
yurivict opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Please consider making a release #177

yurivict opened this issue Jun 16, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@yurivict
Copy link

The last release was in 2019.

@sp1ritCS
Copy link
Contributor

You want a cLaTeXMath or MicroTeX release?

@yurivict
Copy link
Author

Are these two different projects?
What should users use?

@sp1ritCS
Copy link
Contributor

sp1ritCS commented Jun 16, 2024

two codebases same repository (master v. openmath branch)

clatexmath has some licensing issues but microtex is still in beta.

I generally suggest to use MicroTeX if possible, as the API is very unlikely to change anymore and a lot of parser improvements [fixes to null pointer deref segfaults] are only added to µTeX (clm and µTeX share the same parser).
But for example for NoteKit we are still targeting clm until µTeX is released.

Note: 2b93740 is considered clm version 0.0.5, it's just not tagged in git.

@yurivict
Copy link
Author

yurivict commented Nov 8, 2024

We use MicroTex in the FreeBSD port.
If you would make a fresh release, users would more likely use the latest code vs. some very old revisions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants