-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathfeed.xml
2246 lines (1718 loc) · 686 KB
/
feed.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Princeton Gerrymandering Project - State Reform Routes</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/feed/</link><description>Latest content from Princeton Gerrymandering Project's Reforms page.</description><atom:link href="http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/feed/" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Alabama</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AL</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Alabama redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/al/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>If racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.</p>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://lwval.org/">League of Women Voters of Alabama</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.alabamavotingrights.com/">Alabama Voting Rights Project</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<ul>\n<li>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn. Some of Alabama\'s maps this past decade were found by federal courts to be racial gerrymanders. There may be another attempt to commit racial gerrymanders in the upcoming redistricting cycle.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Because a single party will control redistricting, there is an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/chestnut-v-merrill">Chestnut v. Merrill</a>) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Alabama\'s 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts as cracking minority voters, and the 7th congressional district as packing minority voters. The case is set to begin trial on November 4, 2019, but the challengers will only be able to get a declaratory judgment, not any change in the map.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Alabama is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Alabama was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Alabama was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Alabamans are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Alabama's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alabama law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'AL', 'actions': "Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Alabama redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/al/).\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.\r\n\r\nIf racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Alabama](https://lwval.org/)\r\n\r\n[Alabama Voting Rights Project](https://www.alabamavotingrights.com/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "- The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn. Some of Alabama's maps this past decade were found by federal courts to be racial gerrymanders. There may be another attempt to commit racial gerrymanders in the upcoming redistricting cycle.\r\n\r\nBecause a single party will control redistricting, there is an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.\r\n\r\n- A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Chestnut v. Merrill](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/chestnut-v-merrill)) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Alabama's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts as cracking minority voters, and the 7th congressional district as packing minority voters. The case is set to begin trial on November 4, 2019, but the challengers will only be able to get a declaratory judgment, not any change in the map.\r\n\r\n- Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Alabama is estimated to lose one congressional seat.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 1, 28, 19, 41, 3, 622833, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/AL', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Alabama', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Alabama was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Alabama was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Alabamans are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Alabama's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alabama law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 0}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AL</guid><actions>Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Alabama redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/al/).
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.
If racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Alabama redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/al/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.</p></actions_rendered><process>Alabama's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alabama law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</process><process_rendered><p>Alabama's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alabama law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</p></process_rendered><issues>- The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn. Some of Alabama's maps this past decade were found by federal courts to be racial gerrymanders. There may be another attempt to commit racial gerrymanders in the upcoming redistricting cycle.
Because a single party will control redistricting, there is an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.
- A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Chestnut v. Merrill](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/chestnut-v-merrill)) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Alabama's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts as cracking minority voters, and the 7th congressional district as packing minority voters. The case is set to begin trial on November 4, 2019, but the challengers will only be able to get a declaratory judgment, not any change in the map.
- Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Alabama is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</issues><issues_rendered><ul>
<li>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn. Some of Alabama's maps this past decade were found by federal courts to be racial gerrymanders. There may be another attempt to commit racial gerrymanders in the upcoming redistricting cycle.</li>
</ul>
<p>Because a single party will control redistricting, there is an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/chestnut-v-merrill">Chestnut v. Merrill</a>) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Alabama's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts as cracking minority voters, and the 7th congressional district as packing minority voters. The case is set to begin trial on November 4, 2019, but the challengers will only be able to get a declaratory judgment, not any change in the map.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Alabama is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p>
</li>
</ul></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>- The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn. Some of Alabama's maps this past decade were found by federal courts to be racial gerrymanders. There may be another attempt to commit racial gerrymanders in the upcoming redistricting cycle.
Because a single party will control redistricting, there is an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.
- A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Chestnut v. Merrill](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/chestnut-v-merrill)) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Alabama's 1st, 2nd, and 3rd congressional districts as cracking minority voters, and the 7th congressional district as packing minority voters. The case is set to begin trial on November 4, 2019, but the challengers will only be able to get a declaratory judgment, not any change in the map.
- Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Alabama is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://lwval.org/">League of Women Voters of Alabama</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.alabamavotingrights.com/">Alabama Voting Rights Project</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Jan 28 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Alaska</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AK</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Alaska redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ak/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="http://akredistricting.org">Alaska\'s Redistricting Board</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://juneaulwv.org/">League of Women Voters Juneau</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.lwvalaska.org/">League of Women Voters Alaska</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': "<p>Alaska's state legislative maps do not score poorly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness. </p>\n<p>Potential issues are a lack of representation for indigenous Alaskans and communities of interest.</p>", '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Alaska was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Alaska was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Alaskans are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Alaska's state legislative district lines are drawn by the state's Redistricting Board, an independent commission with members appointed by the Governor, the majority leaders in each chamber of the Legislature, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Alaska has only one at-large congressional district.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alaska law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'AK', 'actions': "Participate in the Commission's public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Alaska redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/ak/).\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': "[Alaska's Redistricting Board](http://akredistricting.org)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters Juneau](http://juneaulwv.org/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters Alaska](http://www.lwvalaska.org/)", 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': '', 'draws_state_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "Alaska's state legislative maps do not score poorly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness. \r\n\r\nPotential issues are a lack of representation for indigenous Alaskans and communities of interest.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 17, 25, 1, 862511, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/AK', 'legislative_control': 'Senate: Republican; House: Bipartisan Coalition Control', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Alaska', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Alaska was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Alaska was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Alaskans are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Alaska's state legislative district lines are drawn by the state's Redistricting Board, an independent commission with members appointed by the Governor, the majority leaders in each chamber of the Legislature, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Alaska has only one at-large congressional district.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alaska law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 1}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AK</guid><actions>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.
- Obtain Alaska redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/ak/).
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Alaska redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ak/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Alaska's state legislative district lines are drawn by the state's Redistricting Board, an independent commission with members appointed by the Governor, the majority leaders in each chamber of the Legislature, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Alaska has only one at-large congressional district.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alaska law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</process><process_rendered><p>Alaska's state legislative district lines are drawn by the state's Redistricting Board, an independent commission with members appointed by the Governor, the majority leaders in each chamber of the Legislature, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Alaska has only one at-large congressional district.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Alaska law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</p></process_rendered><issues>Alaska's state legislative maps do not score poorly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness.
Potential issues are a lack of representation for indigenous Alaskans and communities of interest.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Alaska's state legislative maps do not score poorly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness. </p>
<p>Potential issues are a lack of representation for indigenous Alaskans and communities of interest.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Alaska's state legislative maps do not score poorly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness.
Potential issues are a lack of representation for indigenous Alaskans and communities of interest.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="http://akredistricting.org">Alaska's Redistricting Board</a></p>
<p><a href="http://juneaulwv.org/">League of Women Voters Juneau</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lwvalaska.org/">League of Women Voters Alaska</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries></congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Senate: Republican; House: Bipartisan Coalition Control</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Arizona</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AZ</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Arizona redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/az/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://azredistricting.org">Arizona Redistricting Commission</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/arizona">League of Women Voters of Arizona</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Arizona\'s congressional maps do not score highly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project\'s tests of partisan unfairness.</p>\n<p>Potential issues are a lack of representation for Native Americans and Latinos, as well as communities of interest.</p>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Arizona is estimated to gain one congressional seat following reapportionment.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Arizona was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Arizona was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Arizonans are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Arizona's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the state's Independent Redistricting Commission.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arizona law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or candidate for office.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'AZ', 'actions': "Participate in the Commission's public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Arizona redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/az/).\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Arizona Redistricting Commission](https://azredistricting.org)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Arizona](https://my.lwv.org/arizona)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'draws_state_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "Arizona's congressional maps do not score highly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness.\r\n\r\nPotential issues are a lack of representation for Native Americans and Latinos, as well as communities of interest.\r\n\r\nBased upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Arizona is estimated to gain one congressional seat following reapportionment.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 1, 28, 19, 31, 26, 288782, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/AZ', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Arizona', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Arizona was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Arizona was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Arizonans are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Arizona's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the state's Independent Redistricting Commission.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arizona law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or candidate for office.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 1}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AZ</guid><actions>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.
- Obtain Arizona redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/az/).
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Arizona redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/az/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Arizona's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the state's Independent Redistricting Commission.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arizona law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or candidate for office.</process><process_rendered><p>Arizona's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the state's Independent Redistricting Commission.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arizona law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or candidate for office.</p></process_rendered><issues>Arizona's congressional maps do not score highly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness.
Potential issues are a lack of representation for Native Americans and Latinos, as well as communities of interest.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Arizona is estimated to gain one congressional seat following reapportionment.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Arizona's congressional maps do not score highly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness.</p>
<p>Potential issues are a lack of representation for Native Americans and Latinos, as well as communities of interest.</p>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Arizona is estimated to gain one congressional seat following reapportionment.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Arizona's congressional maps do not score highly on the Princeton Gerrymandering Project's tests of partisan unfairness.
Potential issues are a lack of representation for Native Americans and Latinos, as well as communities of interest.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Arizona is estimated to gain one congressional seat following reapportionment.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://azredistricting.org">Arizona Redistricting Commission</a></p>
<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/arizona">League of Women Voters of Arizona</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Jan 28 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Arkansas</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AR</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Gather signatures for the independent citizens\' redistricting commission. To be on the ballot, the <a href="https://www.arkansasag.gov/assets/opinions/2018-135.pdf#page=13">initiative petition</a> needs 89,151 valid signatures by July 3, 2020.</p>\n<p>Obtain Arkansas redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ar/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="http://www.lwv-arkansas.org/">League of Women Voters of Arkansas</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.acluarkansas.org/">ACLU of Arkansas</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p><b><u>Legal Challenge</b></u></p>\n<p>In 2011, the state legislative maps were sued by a state senator who alleged vote dilution. The map lowered the black voting age population in his district from 58% to 53%. The Court found no legal issue, holding that the reduction was an unfortunate consequence, not a product of vote dilution under the Voting Rights Act nor intentional discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.</p>\n<p><b><u>Proposed Reform</b></u></p>\n<p>Arkansas currently has single-party control over redistricting. A constitutional amendment could replace the current process with a commission. A proposed redistricting initiative, sponsored by Little Rock attorney David Couch, would <a href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2018/10/26/attorney-general-approves-proposal-for-independent-redistricting-commission">establish</a> an independent citizens\' redistricting commission. Passage of this proposal would change the redistricting process for 2021.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>This proposed amendment would create an independent seven-member commission. Four members (two per party) would be appointed by the state legislative leadership, and those four members would select three unaffiliated commissioners.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The initiative would also prohibit partisanship in districting, protect minority groups, and require respect for communities of interest.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Lastly, the commission would have to conduct at least one public hearing per congressional district with adequate notice. It also would create a website to publish all data used by the commission as well as draft maps, meeting transcripts, and copies of reports.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': '<p><b><u>State Legislative</b></u></p>\n<p>Arkansas\' state legislative districts are drawn by an Apportionment Board consisting of the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of State. Predicted Republican gains have come to fruition with Republicans holding large majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly: 74R-26D in the House and 26R-9D in the Senate.</p>\n<p><b><u>Congressional</b></u></p>\n<p>Arkansas\' congressional districts are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor\'s veto. The Legislature has the power to override the Governor\'s veto with a simple majority in each chamber. Arkansas\' current congressional delegation is four Republicans and no Democrats.</p>\n<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arkansas law requires that state Senate districts be contiguous and keep counties whole. The <a href="http://www.arkansasredistricting.org/redistricting-criteria">Apportionment Board\'s website</a> discusses other criteria like compactness and respecting communities of interest, but these are not required by law. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>\n<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>\n<p>While no public hearings are currently required under Arkansas law, the state legislative Apportionment Board held seven hearings between May and July in the 2011 cycle. Without a change in the law, it is likely for there to be a similar timeline.</p>', 'abbreviation': 'AR', 'actions': "Gather signatures for the independent citizens' redistricting commission. To be on the ballot, the [initiative petition](https://www.arkansasag.gov/assets/opinions/2018-135.pdf#page=13) needs 89,151 valid signatures by July 3, 2020.\r\n\r\nObtain Arkansas redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/ar/).\r\n\r\nUse software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Arkansas](http://www.lwv-arkansas.org/)\r\n\r\n[ACLU of Arkansas](https://www.acluarkansas.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Apportionment Board', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': '<b><u>Legal Challenge</b></u>\r\n\r\nIn 2011, the state legislative maps were sued by a state senator who alleged vote dilution. The map lowered the black voting age population in his district from 58% to 53%. The Court found no legal issue, holding that the reduction was an unfortunate consequence, not a product of vote dilution under the Voting Rights Act nor intentional discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Proposed Reform</b></u>\r\n\r\nArkansas currently has single-party control over redistricting. A constitutional amendment could replace the current process with a commission. A proposed redistricting initiative, sponsored by Little Rock attorney David Couch, would <a href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2018/10/26/attorney-general-approves-proposal-for-independent-redistricting-commission">establish</a> an independent citizens\' redistricting commission. Passage of this proposal would change the redistricting process for 2021.\r\n\r\n- This proposed amendment would create an independent seven-member commission. Four members (two per party) would be appointed by the state legislative leadership, and those four members would select three unaffiliated commissioners.\r\n\r\n- The initiative would also prohibit partisanship in districting, protect minority groups, and require respect for communities of interest.\r\n\r\n- Lastly, the commission would have to conduct at least one public hearing per congressional district with adequate notice. It also would create a website to publish all data used by the commission as well as draft maps, meeting transcripts, and copies of reports.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 19, 16, 34, 9, 566635, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/AR', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Arkansas', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "<b><u>State Legislative</b></u>\r\n\r\nArkansas' state legislative districts are drawn by an Apportionment Board consisting of the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of State. Predicted Republican gains have come to fruition with Republicans holding large majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly: 74R-26D in the House and 26R-9D in the Senate.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Congressional</b></u>\r\n\r\nArkansas' congressional districts are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature has the power to override the Governor's veto with a simple majority in each chamber. Arkansas' current congressional delegation is four Republicans and no Democrats.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Criteria</b></u>\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arkansas law requires that state Senate districts be contiguous and keep counties whole. The [Apportionment Board's website](http://www.arkansasredistricting.org/redistricting-criteria) discusses other criteria like compactness and respecting communities of interest, but these are not required by law. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Public Input</b></u>\r\n\r\nWhile no public hearings are currently required under Arkansas law, the state legislative Apportionment Board held seven hearings between May and July in the 2011 cycle. Without a change in the law, it is likely for there to be a similar timeline.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 3}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/AR</guid><actions>Gather signatures for the independent citizens' redistricting commission. To be on the ballot, the [initiative petition](https://www.arkansasag.gov/assets/opinions/2018-135.pdf#page=13) needs 89,151 valid signatures by July 3, 2020.
Obtain Arkansas redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/ar/).
Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Gather signatures for the independent citizens' redistricting commission. To be on the ballot, the <a href="https://www.arkansasag.gov/assets/opinions/2018-135.pdf#page=13">initiative petition</a> needs 89,151 valid signatures by July 3, 2020.</p>
<p>Obtain Arkansas redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ar/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p></actions_rendered><process><b><u>State Legislative</b></u>
Arkansas' state legislative districts are drawn by an Apportionment Board consisting of the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of State. Predicted Republican gains have come to fruition with Republicans holding large majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly: 74R-26D in the House and 26R-9D in the Senate.
<b><u>Congressional</b></u>
Arkansas' congressional districts are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature has the power to override the Governor's veto with a simple majority in each chamber. Arkansas' current congressional delegation is four Republicans and no Democrats.
<b><u>Criteria</b></u>
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arkansas law requires that state Senate districts be contiguous and keep counties whole. The [Apportionment Board's website](http://www.arkansasredistricting.org/redistricting-criteria) discusses other criteria like compactness and respecting communities of interest, but these are not required by law. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.
<b><u>Public Input</b></u>
While no public hearings are currently required under Arkansas law, the state legislative Apportionment Board held seven hearings between May and July in the 2011 cycle. Without a change in the law, it is likely for there to be a similar timeline.</process><process_rendered><p><b><u>State Legislative</b></u></p>
<p>Arkansas' state legislative districts are drawn by an Apportionment Board consisting of the Governor, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of State. Predicted Republican gains have come to fruition with Republicans holding large majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly: 74R-26D in the House and 26R-9D in the Senate.</p>
<p><b><u>Congressional</b></u></p>
<p>Arkansas' congressional districts are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature has the power to override the Governor's veto with a simple majority in each chamber. Arkansas' current congressional delegation is four Republicans and no Democrats.</p>
<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Arkansas law requires that state Senate districts be contiguous and keep counties whole. The <a href="http://www.arkansasredistricting.org/redistricting-criteria">Apportionment Board's website</a> discusses other criteria like compactness and respecting communities of interest, but these are not required by law. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>
<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>
<p>While no public hearings are currently required under Arkansas law, the state legislative Apportionment Board held seven hearings between May and July in the 2011 cycle. Without a change in the law, it is likely for there to be a similar timeline.</p></process_rendered><issues><b><u>Legal Challenge</b></u>
In 2011, the state legislative maps were sued by a state senator who alleged vote dilution. The map lowered the black voting age population in his district from 58% to 53%. The Court found no legal issue, holding that the reduction was an unfortunate consequence, not a product of vote dilution under the Voting Rights Act nor intentional discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
<b><u>Proposed Reform</b></u>
Arkansas currently has single-party control over redistricting. A constitutional amendment could replace the current process with a commission. A proposed redistricting initiative, sponsored by Little Rock attorney David Couch, would <a href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2018/10/26/attorney-general-approves-proposal-for-independent-redistricting-commission">establish</a> an independent citizens' redistricting commission. Passage of this proposal would change the redistricting process for 2021.
- This proposed amendment would create an independent seven-member commission. Four members (two per party) would be appointed by the state legislative leadership, and those four members would select three unaffiliated commissioners.
- The initiative would also prohibit partisanship in districting, protect minority groups, and require respect for communities of interest.
- Lastly, the commission would have to conduct at least one public hearing per congressional district with adequate notice. It also would create a website to publish all data used by the commission as well as draft maps, meeting transcripts, and copies of reports.</issues><issues_rendered><p><b><u>Legal Challenge</b></u></p>
<p>In 2011, the state legislative maps were sued by a state senator who alleged vote dilution. The map lowered the black voting age population in his district from 58% to 53%. The Court found no legal issue, holding that the reduction was an unfortunate consequence, not a product of vote dilution under the Voting Rights Act nor intentional discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.</p>
<p><b><u>Proposed Reform</b></u></p>
<p>Arkansas currently has single-party control over redistricting. A constitutional amendment could replace the current process with a commission. A proposed redistricting initiative, sponsored by Little Rock attorney David Couch, would <a href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2018/10/26/attorney-general-approves-proposal-for-independent-redistricting-commission">establish</a> an independent citizens' redistricting commission. Passage of this proposal would change the redistricting process for 2021.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>This proposed amendment would create an independent seven-member commission. Four members (two per party) would be appointed by the state legislative leadership, and those four members would select three unaffiliated commissioners.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The initiative would also prohibit partisanship in districting, protect minority groups, and require respect for communities of interest.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Lastly, the commission would have to conduct at least one public hearing per congressional district with adequate notice. It also would create a website to publish all data used by the commission as well as draft maps, meeting transcripts, and copies of reports.</p>
</li>
</ul></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts><b><u>Legal Challenge</b></u>
In 2011, the state legislative maps were sued by a state senator who alleged vote dilution. The map lowered the black voting age population in his district from 58% to 53%. The Court found no legal issue, holding that the reduction was an unfortunate consequence, not a product of vote dilution under the Voting Rights Act nor intentional discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.
<b><u>Proposed Reform</b></u>
Arkansas currently has single-party control over redistricting. A constitutional amendment could replace the current process with a commission. A proposed redistricting initiative, sponsored by Little Rock attorney David Couch, would <a href="https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2018/10/26/attorney-general-approves-proposal-for-independent-redistricting-commission">establish</a> an independent citizens' redistricting commission. Passage of this proposal would change the redistricting process for 2021.
- This proposed amendment would create an independent seven-member commission. Four members (two per party) would be appointed by the state legislative leadership, and those four members would select three unaffiliated commissioners.
- The initiative would also prohibit partisanship in districting, protect minority groups, and require respect for communities of interest.
- Lastly, the commission would have to conduct at least one public hearing per congressional district with adequate notice. It also would create a website to publish all data used by the commission as well as draft maps, meeting transcripts, and copies of reports.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="http://www.lwv-arkansas.org/">League of Women Voters of Arkansas</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.acluarkansas.org/">ACLU of Arkansas</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by apportionment board</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 19 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>California</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/CA</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain California redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ca/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov">California Citizens Commission</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://shapecaliforniasfuture.auditor.ca.gov/index.html">Shape California\'s Future</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.localredistricting.org/">California Local Redistricting Project</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/california/">California Common Cause</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://lwvc.org/">League of Women Voters of California</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Potential underrepresentation of communities of interest.</p>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, California is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': '<p>California\'s state legislative and congressional maps are drawn by an Independent Commission of citizens, selected through a rigorous process to reduce partisan influences. The application process for this Commission ended in late 2019. The State Auditor\'s Applicant Review Panel (ARP) will begin scheduling and conducting interviews of the 120 most qualified applicants between February and April 2020. In mid-April through May, the ARP will choose 60 applicants and send them to the Legislature. By the end of June, the Legislature gets to use 24 "strikes" to remove certain applicants. By July 5, 2020, the Auditor will randomly select the first eight commissioners from the final list of 36, and these eight will then select the remaining six. A final plan must be drafted by September 15, 2021.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, California law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate for office, or political party.</p>\n<p>Throughout the process, the Commission must receive broad public input, both before and after drafting district maps. Such draft maps must be released by July 1, 2021 and available for 14 days. Another draft map may not be released within this period. In 2011, public hearings occurred across the state between April 9 and July 29.</p>', 'abbreviation': 'CA', 'actions': 'Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Obtain California redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ca/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': "[California Citizens Commission](http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov)\r\n\r\n[Shape California's Future](https://shapecaliforniasfuture.auditor.ca.gov/index.html)\r\n\r\n[California Local Redistricting Project](http://www.localredistricting.org/)\r\n\r\n[California Common Cause](https://www.commoncause.org/california/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of California](https://lwvc.org/)", 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'draws_state_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'Potential underrepresentation of communities of interest.\r\n\r\nBased upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, California is estimated to lose one congressional seat.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 7, 21, 15, 39, 133099, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/CA', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'California', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': 'California\'s state legislative and congressional maps are drawn by an Independent Commission of citizens, selected through a rigorous process to reduce partisan influences. The application process for this Commission ended in late 2019. The State Auditor\'s Applicant Review Panel (ARP) will begin scheduling and conducting interviews of the 120 most qualified applicants between February and April 2020. In mid-April through May, the ARP will choose 60 applicants and send them to the Legislature. By the end of June, the Legislature gets to use 24 "strikes" to remove certain applicants. By July 5, 2020, the Auditor will randomly select the first eight commissioners from the final list of 36, and these eight will then select the remaining six. A final plan must be drafted by September 15, 2021.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, California law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate for office, or political party.\r\n\r\nThroughout the process, the Commission must receive broad public input, both before and after drafting district maps. Such draft maps must be released by July 1, 2021 and available for 14 days. Another draft map may not be released within this period. In 2011, public hearings occurred across the state between April 9 and July 29.', 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 1}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/CA</guid><actions>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.
- Obtain California redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ca/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain California redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ca/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>California's state legislative and congressional maps are drawn by an Independent Commission of citizens, selected through a rigorous process to reduce partisan influences. The application process for this Commission ended in late 2019. The State Auditor's Applicant Review Panel (ARP) will begin scheduling and conducting interviews of the 120 most qualified applicants between February and April 2020. In mid-April through May, the ARP will choose 60 applicants and send them to the Legislature. By the end of June, the Legislature gets to use 24 "strikes" to remove certain applicants. By July 5, 2020, the Auditor will randomly select the first eight commissioners from the final list of 36, and these eight will then select the remaining six. A final plan must be drafted by September 15, 2021.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, California law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate for office, or political party.
Throughout the process, the Commission must receive broad public input, both before and after drafting district maps. Such draft maps must be released by July 1, 2021 and available for 14 days. Another draft map may not be released within this period. In 2011, public hearings occurred across the state between April 9 and July 29.</process><process_rendered><p>California's state legislative and congressional maps are drawn by an Independent Commission of citizens, selected through a rigorous process to reduce partisan influences. The application process for this Commission ended in late 2019. The State Auditor's Applicant Review Panel (ARP) will begin scheduling and conducting interviews of the 120 most qualified applicants between February and April 2020. In mid-April through May, the ARP will choose 60 applicants and send them to the Legislature. By the end of June, the Legislature gets to use 24 "strikes" to remove certain applicants. By July 5, 2020, the Auditor will randomly select the first eight commissioners from the final list of 36, and these eight will then select the remaining six. A final plan must be drafted by September 15, 2021.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, California law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate for office, or political party.</p>
<p>Throughout the process, the Commission must receive broad public input, both before and after drafting district maps. Such draft maps must be released by July 1, 2021 and available for 14 days. Another draft map may not be released within this period. In 2011, public hearings occurred across the state between April 9 and July 29.</p></process_rendered><issues>Potential underrepresentation of communities of interest.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, California is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Potential underrepresentation of communities of interest.</p>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, California is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Potential underrepresentation of communities of interest.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, California is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov">California Citizens Commission</a></p>
<p><a href="https://shapecaliforniasfuture.auditor.ca.gov/index.html">Shape California's Future</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.localredistricting.org/">California Local Redistricting Project</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/california/">California Common Cause</a></p>
<p><a href="https://lwvc.org/">League of Women Voters of California</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 07 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Colorado</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/CO</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/co/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.colorado.gov/cga-redistrict">Government\'s "Redistricting in Colorado" Webpage</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://lwvcolorado.org/lwv/">League of Women Voters of Colorado</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/colorado/">Colorado Common Cause</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Representation of communities of interest and minority groups.</p>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Colorado is poised to gain one congressional seat.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p><b><u>The Commissions</u></b></p>\n<p>Beginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Colorado's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by two separate independent redistricting commissions.</p>\n<p><u>Congressional</u></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>By January 18, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 1, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>By March 1, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 45 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 1, 2021.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><u>Legislative</u></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>By January 25, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 15, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>By March 16, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 113 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 15, 2021.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b><u>Criteria</u></b></p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Colorado law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Additionally, for state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, party, or candidate for office is prohibited.</p>\n<p><b><u>Public Input</u></b></p>\n<p>Both of these commissions will have the same public input requirements but with different deadlines. Within 20 days of convening, each commission shall receive written comment about preliminary maps and about communities of interest. Both commissions must also conduct at least three public hearings in each congressional district and accept public comment through their websites. The public hearing deadline for the congressional commission is July 7, 2021. The deadline for the state legislative commission is July 21, 2021.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'CO', 'actions': 'Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Obtain redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/co/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Government\'s "Redistricting in Colorado" Webpage](https://www.colorado.gov/cga-redistrict)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Colorado](http://lwvcolorado.org/lwv/)\r\n\r\n[Colorado Common Cause](https://www.commoncause.org/colorado/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'draws_state_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'Representation of communities of interest and minority groups.\r\n\r\nBased upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Colorado is poised to gain one congressional seat.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 17, 19, 25, 23, 829572, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/CO', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Colorado', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "<b><u>The Commissions</u></b>\r\n\r\nBeginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Colorado's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by two separate independent redistricting commissions.\r\n\r\n<u>Congressional</u>\r\n\r\n- By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.\r\n\r\n- By January 18, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 1, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.\r\n\r\n- By March 1, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 45 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 1, 2021.\r\n\r\n<u>Legislative</u>\r\n\r\n- By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.\r\n\r\n- By January 25, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 15, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.\r\n\r\n- By March 16, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 113 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 15, 2021.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Criteria</u></b>\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Colorado law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Additionally, for state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, party, or candidate for office is prohibited.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Public Input</u></b>\r\n\r\nBoth of these commissions will have the same public input requirements but with different deadlines. Within 20 days of convening, each commission shall receive written comment about preliminary maps and about communities of interest. Both commissions must also conduct at least three public hearings in each congressional district and accept public comment through their websites. The public hearing deadline for the congressional commission is July 7, 2021. The deadline for the state legislative commission is July 21, 2021.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 1}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/CO</guid><actions>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.
- Obtain redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/co/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/co/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process><b><u>The Commissions</u></b>
Beginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Colorado's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by two separate independent redistricting commissions.
<u>Congressional</u>
- By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.
- By January 18, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 1, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.
- By March 1, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 45 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 1, 2021.
<u>Legislative</u>
- By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.
- By January 25, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 15, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.
- By March 16, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 113 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 15, 2021.
<b><u>Criteria</u></b>
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Colorado law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Additionally, for state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, party, or candidate for office is prohibited.
<b><u>Public Input</u></b>
Both of these commissions will have the same public input requirements but with different deadlines. Within 20 days of convening, each commission shall receive written comment about preliminary maps and about communities of interest. Both commissions must also conduct at least three public hearings in each congressional district and accept public comment through their websites. The public hearing deadline for the congressional commission is July 7, 2021. The deadline for the state legislative commission is July 21, 2021.</process><process_rendered><p><b><u>The Commissions</u></b></p>
<p>Beginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Colorado's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by two separate independent redistricting commissions.</p>
<p><u>Congressional</u></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>By January 18, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 1, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>By March 1, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 45 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 1, 2021.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><u>Legislative</u></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>By August 10, 2020, the nonpartisan staff shall hold one or more public hearings to guide the creation of an application process. All applications must be submitted by November 10, 2020, and these will be reviewed by a panel of three retired state judges. The staff will remove ineligible applications by January 11.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>By January 25, 2021, the retired judges shall select 300 applicants from the two major parties and 450 who do not affiliate with either. By February 15, 2021, the panel will cut these applicants to 50 per party and 50 not affiliated with either, and these applicants must demonstrate certain skills. Separately, by February 16, the four legislative leaders will each submit a list of ten applicants from the original applicant pool who affiliate with one of the two major parties. Each congressional district must be represented in the panel's and the leadership's pools.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>By March 16, the panel of judges will select four commissioners from each major party and four unaffiliated with either. Their selections must come from the randomized pool and the legislative leaders' pools. By March 30, the Commission must be convened by the Governor, and its initial plan must be released 113 days after the commission is convened or after census data is available, whichever is later. There must be a final plan by September 15, 2021.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><b><u>Criteria</u></b></p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Colorado law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and be drawn to promote competitiveness. Additionally, for state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, party, or candidate for office is prohibited.</p>
<p><b><u>Public Input</u></b></p>
<p>Both of these commissions will have the same public input requirements but with different deadlines. Within 20 days of convening, each commission shall receive written comment about preliminary maps and about communities of interest. Both commissions must also conduct at least three public hearings in each congressional district and accept public comment through their websites. The public hearing deadline for the congressional commission is July 7, 2021. The deadline for the state legislative commission is July 21, 2021.</p></process_rendered><issues>Representation of communities of interest and minority groups.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Colorado is poised to gain one congressional seat.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Representation of communities of interest and minority groups.</p>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Colorado is poised to gain one congressional seat.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Representation of communities of interest and minority groups.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Colorado is poised to gain one congressional seat.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.colorado.gov/cga-redistrict">Government's "Redistricting in Colorado" Webpage</a></p>
<p><a href="http://lwvcolorado.org/lwv/">League of Women Voters of Colorado</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/colorado/">Colorado Common Cause</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 17 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Connecticut</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/CT</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Urge the Secretary of State to improve the state\'s process for receiving public comment on maps. </p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Connecticut redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ct/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/connecticut">League of Women Voters of Connecticut</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/connecticut/">Common Cause Connecticut</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has supermajorities in the Legislature when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>\n<p>A case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/national-association-advancement-colored-people-v-merrill">NAACP v. Merrill</a>) has been filed challenging prison gerrymandering in Connecticut as a violation of one person, one vote. In Connecticut (and other states), prisoners are counted as residents of the districts where their prisons are located as opposed to being counted as residents of their home address.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Connecticut's Legislature has the primary responsibility of drawing state legislative and congressional district lines. A supermajority of two-thirds of each chamber is required to adopt a district plan. If the Legislature fails to adopt a plan for any chamber, the lines will be drawn by a nine-member backup Commission.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Connecticut law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'CT', 'actions': 'Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Urge the Secretary of State to improve the state\'s process for receiving public comment on maps. \r\n\r\n- Obtain Connecticut redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ct/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Legislature as public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Connecticut](https://my.lwv.org/connecticut)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Connecticut](https://www.commoncause.org/connecticut/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has supermajorities in the Legislature when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.\r\n\r\nA case ([NAACP v. Merrill](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/national-association-advancement-colored-people-v-merrill)) has been filed challenging prison gerrymandering in Connecticut as a violation of one person, one vote. In Connecticut (and other states), prisoners are counted as residents of the districts where their prisons are located as opposed to being counted as residents of their home address.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 11, 1, 15, 28, 39, 825987, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/CT', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Connecticut', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Connecticut's Legislature has the primary responsibility of drawing state legislative and congressional district lines. A supermajority of two-thirds of each chamber is required to adopt a district plan. If the Legislature fails to adopt a plan for any chamber, the lines will be drawn by a nine-member backup Commission.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Connecticut law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 0}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/CT</guid><actions>Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Urge the Secretary of State to improve the state's process for receiving public comment on maps.
- Obtain Connecticut redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ct/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Legislature as public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Urge the Secretary of State to improve the state's process for receiving public comment on maps. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Obtain Connecticut redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ct/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Connecticut's Legislature has the primary responsibility of drawing state legislative and congressional district lines. A supermajority of two-thirds of each chamber is required to adopt a district plan. If the Legislature fails to adopt a plan for any chamber, the lines will be drawn by a nine-member backup Commission.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Connecticut law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</process><process_rendered><p>Connecticut's Legislature has the primary responsibility of drawing state legislative and congressional district lines. A supermajority of two-thirds of each chamber is required to adopt a district plan. If the Legislature fails to adopt a plan for any chamber, the lines will be drawn by a nine-member backup Commission.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Connecticut law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p></process_rendered><issues>Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has supermajorities in the Legislature when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.
A case ([NAACP v. Merrill](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/national-association-advancement-colored-people-v-merrill)) has been filed challenging prison gerrymandering in Connecticut as a violation of one person, one vote. In Connecticut (and other states), prisoners are counted as residents of the districts where their prisons are located as opposed to being counted as residents of their home address.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has supermajorities in the Legislature when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>
<p>A case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/national-association-advancement-colored-people-v-merrill">NAACP v. Merrill</a>) has been filed challenging prison gerrymandering in Connecticut as a violation of one person, one vote. In Connecticut (and other states), prisoners are counted as residents of the districts where their prisons are located as opposed to being counted as residents of their home address.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has supermajorities in the Legislature when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.
A case ([NAACP v. Merrill](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/national-association-advancement-colored-people-v-merrill)) has been filed challenging prison gerrymandering in Connecticut as a violation of one person, one vote. In Connecticut (and other states), prisoners are counted as residents of the districts where their prisons are located as opposed to being counted as residents of their home address.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/connecticut">League of Women Voters of Connecticut</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/connecticut/">Common Cause Connecticut</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Nov 01 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Delaware</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/DE</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>In 2020, support candidates who advocate for fair districting.</p>\n<p>In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Delaware redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/de/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment, which is accepted in written format.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/delaware/">Common Cause Delaware</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://lwvdelaware.org/">League of Women Voters of Delaware</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Democratic win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Republican win will lead to bipartisan control.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party maintains control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Delaware's legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths majority in each chamber. Delaware has only one at-large congressional district.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Delaware law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous. Unduly favoring or disfavoring a person or party is prohibited.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'DE', 'actions': 'In 2020, support candidates who advocate for fair districting.\r\n\r\nIn 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Delaware redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/de/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment, which is accepted in written format.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Common Cause Delaware](https://www.commoncause.org/delaware/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Delaware](http://lwvdelaware.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': '', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Democratic win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Republican win will lead to bipartisan control.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 17, 28, 27, 2537, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/DE', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Delaware', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party maintains control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Delaware's legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths majority in each chamber. Delaware has only one at-large congressional district.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Delaware law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous. Unduly favoring or disfavoring a person or party is prohibited.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 0}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/DE</guid><actions>In 2020, support candidates who advocate for fair districting.
In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Delaware redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/de/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment, which is accepted in written format.</actions><actions_rendered><p>In 2020, support candidates who advocate for fair districting.</p>
<p>In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Delaware redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/de/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment, which is accepted in written format.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Delaware's legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths majority in each chamber. Delaware has only one at-large congressional district.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Delaware law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous. Unduly favoring or disfavoring a person or party is prohibited.</process><process_rendered><p>Delaware's legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths majority in each chamber. Delaware has only one at-large congressional district.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Delaware law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous. Unduly favoring or disfavoring a person or party is prohibited.</p></process_rendered><issues>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Democratic win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Republican win will lead to bipartisan control.</issues><issues_rendered><p>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Democratic win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Republican win will lead to bipartisan control.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Democratic win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Republican win will lead to bipartisan control.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/delaware/">Common Cause Delaware</a></p>
<p><a href="http://lwvdelaware.org/">League of Women Voters of Delaware</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries></congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Florida</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/FL</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Support bills and initiatives that build upon the reform movement started last cycle with the Fair Districts Amendments.</p>\n<p>One concrete action is to support a ballot initiative to Florida\'s ballot to create an independent citizens\' redistricting commission. This will prevent gerrymanders from being committed in the first place.</p>\n<p>Extreme plans can favor one party or the other, or severely hinder the representation of racial and ethnic communities.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>One remedy is to make sure that public input is as effective as possible through data and technology (for instance, using public input tools such as Representable.org), so that legislators will have communities of interest easily available to them.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>To that end, a bill has been introduced (SB252) to expand public access to draft plans by revising a section of Florida’s public records law.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Another remedy is to achieve split-party control of government. Florida currently has single-party government under Republicans.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>In the 2020 election, this can be done in the 2020 election by changing 14 state House seats. The win margins in the 14 closest Republican-won seats in 2018 averaged about 2,100 votes.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>As a comparison, Amendment 4 potentially restores voting rights to 1.4 million Floridians - an average of 12,000 per House district. </p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>In 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Florida redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/fl/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.lwvfl.org/">League of Women Voters of Florida</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/florida/">Common Cause Florida</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.floridaelectoralreform.org/">Florida Initiative for Electoral Reform</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://electionscience.clas.ufl.edu/">Florida Election Science Team (FEST)</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.publicmapping.org/">Public Mapping Project</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when a community is packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, it may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.</p>\n<p>Despite constitutional prohibitions, unified party control of Florida\'s government may lead to an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering. In the post-2010 cycle, the principal avenue for fair districts in Florida was the state Supreme Court – and this route was partially successful in 2011. In 2021, however, the Court’s composition will be very different.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>During the review of state legislative districts by the state Supreme Court in 2012, it ordered that eight state Senate districts be redrawn because of inferred partisan intent. This case was Florida\'s first under its Fair Districts Amendments. A few weeks later, the Legislature adopted a new Senate plan that was upheld by the Court.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>In 2014, plaintiffs challenged the validity of the 2012 congressional plan for a multitude of reasons, including partisan intent, incumbent protection, and minority packing. A final ruling was delayed due to disputes about evidence and discovery, but eventually, two districts were ordered redrawn. The Legislature drew a remedial plan, which was approved by the lower court.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>On appeal, however, the state Supreme Court held that the trial court improperly reviewed the initial challenge and ordered that eight districts, rather than two, be redrawn. Five of these showed partisan intent while three were noncompact or failed to following political and geographic boundaries. The Legislature failed to enact a remedial plan, so in late 2015, the state Supreme Court approved a map that had been adopted by the trial court.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Following this holding, the state Senate voluntarily offered to redraw its previously revised map, believing that it violated the law in a way similar to the congressional one. A special session of the Legislature failed to produce a new Senate map, and the court adopted one of the plaintiffs\' maps.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Florida is estimated to gain two congressional seats.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>In terms of representation, an unfairly drawn plan can have three to six times the effect of even the worst Census undercount. Therefore additional steps are necessary to increase the likelihood of a plan that is responsive to voters.</li>\n</ul>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Florida was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Florida was required to receive pre-approval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Floridians are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p><b><u>Congressional</b></u></p>\n<p>Florida's congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.</p>\n<p><b><u>State Legislative</b></u></p>\n<p>Florida's state legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by joint resolution, which are not subject to the Governor's veto. Within 15 days, these plans are sent to the state Supreme Court to ensure that they meet the state's redistricting standards. If they do not, the legislature gets a second chance to draw plans. If the state Supreme Court again finds that the plans are invalid, the Court will have 60 days to draw its own maps. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.</p>\n<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Florida law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. As a result of the Fair Districts Amendments, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or political party is also prohibited. The Amendments also codified VRA-type language into the Florida Constitution.</p>\n<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>\n<p>While Florida law does not require public hearings, the state held such hearings between June 20 and August 31 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule. Additionally, public map submissions were accepted until November 1, 2011, and overall, 153 public maps were submitted.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'FL', 'actions': "Support bills and initiatives that build upon the reform movement started last cycle with the Fair Districts Amendments.\r\n\r\nOne concrete action is to support a ballot initiative to Florida's ballot to create an independent citizens' redistricting commission. This will prevent gerrymanders from being committed in the first place.\r\n\r\nExtreme plans can favor one party or the other, or severely hinder the representation of racial and ethnic communities.\r\n\r\n- One remedy is to make sure that public input is as effective as possible through data and technology (for instance, using public input tools such as Representable.org), so that legislators will have communities of interest easily available to them.\r\n\r\n- To that end, a bill has been introduced (SB252) to expand public access to draft plans by revising a section of Florida’s public records law.\r\n\r\nAnother remedy is to achieve split-party control of government. Florida currently has single-party government under Republicans.\r\n\r\n- In the 2020 election, this can be done in the 2020 election by changing 14 state House seats. The win margins in the 14 closest Republican-won seats in 2018 averaged about 2,100 votes.\r\n\r\n- As a comparison, Amendment 4 potentially restores voting rights to 1.4 million Floridians - an average of 12,000 per House district. \r\n\r\nIn 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Florida redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/fl/).\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': 3, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Florida](https://www.lwvfl.org/)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Florida](https://www.commoncause.org/florida/)\r\n\r\n[Florida Initiative for Electoral Reform](http://www.floridaelectoralreform.org/)\r\n\r\n[Florida Election Science Team (FEST)](https://electionscience.clas.ufl.edu/)\r\n\r\n[Public Mapping Project](http://www.publicmapping.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when a community is packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, it may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.\r\n\r\nDespite constitutional prohibitions, unified party control of Florida's government may lead to an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering. In the post-2010 cycle, the principal avenue for fair districts in Florida was the state Supreme Court – and this route was partially successful in 2011. In 2021, however, the Court’s composition will be very different.\r\n\r\n- During the review of state legislative districts by the state Supreme Court in 2012, it ordered that eight state Senate districts be redrawn because of inferred partisan intent. This case was Florida's first under its Fair Districts Amendments. A few weeks later, the Legislature adopted a new Senate plan that was upheld by the Court.\r\n\r\n- In 2014, plaintiffs challenged the validity of the 2012 congressional plan for a multitude of reasons, including partisan intent, incumbent protection, and minority packing. A final ruling was delayed due to disputes about evidence and discovery, but eventually, two districts were ordered redrawn. The Legislature drew a remedial plan, which was approved by the lower court.\r\n\r\n- On appeal, however, the state Supreme Court held that the trial court improperly reviewed the initial challenge and ordered that eight districts, rather than two, be redrawn. Five of these showed partisan intent while three were noncompact or failed to following political and geographic boundaries. The Legislature failed to enact a remedial plan, so in late 2015, the state Supreme Court approved a map that had been adopted by the trial court.\r\n\r\n- Following this holding, the state Senate voluntarily offered to redraw its previously revised map, believing that it violated the law in a way similar to the congressional one. A special session of the Legislature failed to produce a new Senate map, and the court adopted one of the plaintiffs' maps.\r\n\r\nBased upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Florida is estimated to gain two congressional seats.\r\n\r\n- In terms of representation, an unfairly drawn plan can have three to six times the effect of even the worst Census undercount. Therefore additional steps are necessary to increase the likelihood of a plan that is responsive to voters.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 19, 16, 39, 7, 144768, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/FL', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Florida', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Florida was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Florida was required to receive pre-approval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Floridians are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "<b><u>Congressional</b></u>\r\n\r\nFlorida's congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.\r\n\r\n<b><u>State Legislative</b></u>\r\n\r\nFlorida's state legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by joint resolution, which are not subject to the Governor's veto. Within 15 days, these plans are sent to the state Supreme Court to ensure that they meet the state's redistricting standards. If they do not, the legislature gets a second chance to draw plans. If the state Supreme Court again finds that the plans are invalid, the Court will have 60 days to draw its own maps. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Criteria</b></u>\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Florida law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. As a result of the Fair Districts Amendments, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or political party is also prohibited. The Amendments also codified VRA-type language into the Florida Constitution.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Public Input</b></u>\r\n\r\nWhile Florida law does not require public hearings, the state held such hearings between June 20 and August 31 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule. Additionally, public map submissions were accepted until November 1, 2011, and overall, 153 public maps were submitted.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 3}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/FL</guid><actions>Support bills and initiatives that build upon the reform movement started last cycle with the Fair Districts Amendments.
One concrete action is to support a ballot initiative to Florida's ballot to create an independent citizens' redistricting commission. This will prevent gerrymanders from being committed in the first place.
Extreme plans can favor one party or the other, or severely hinder the representation of racial and ethnic communities.
- One remedy is to make sure that public input is as effective as possible through data and technology (for instance, using public input tools such as Representable.org), so that legislators will have communities of interest easily available to them.
- To that end, a bill has been introduced (SB252) to expand public access to draft plans by revising a section of Florida’s public records law.
Another remedy is to achieve split-party control of government. Florida currently has single-party government under Republicans.
- In the 2020 election, this can be done in the 2020 election by changing 14 state House seats. The win margins in the 14 closest Republican-won seats in 2018 averaged about 2,100 votes.
- As a comparison, Amendment 4 potentially restores voting rights to 1.4 million Floridians - an average of 12,000 per House district.
In 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.
- Obtain Florida redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/fl/).
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Support bills and initiatives that build upon the reform movement started last cycle with the Fair Districts Amendments.</p>
<p>One concrete action is to support a ballot initiative to Florida's ballot to create an independent citizens' redistricting commission. This will prevent gerrymanders from being committed in the first place.</p>
<p>Extreme plans can favor one party or the other, or severely hinder the representation of racial and ethnic communities.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>One remedy is to make sure that public input is as effective as possible through data and technology (for instance, using public input tools such as Representable.org), so that legislators will have communities of interest easily available to them.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>To that end, a bill has been introduced (SB252) to expand public access to draft plans by revising a section of Florida’s public records law.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Another remedy is to achieve split-party control of government. Florida currently has single-party government under Republicans.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>In the 2020 election, this can be done in the 2020 election by changing 14 state House seats. The win margins in the 14 closest Republican-won seats in 2018 averaged about 2,100 votes.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>As a comparison, Amendment 4 potentially restores voting rights to 1.4 million Floridians - an average of 12,000 per House district. </p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>In 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Florida redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/fl/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process><b><u>Congressional</b></u>
Florida's congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.
<b><u>State Legislative</b></u>
Florida's state legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by joint resolution, which are not subject to the Governor's veto. Within 15 days, these plans are sent to the state Supreme Court to ensure that they meet the state's redistricting standards. If they do not, the legislature gets a second chance to draw plans. If the state Supreme Court again finds that the plans are invalid, the Court will have 60 days to draw its own maps. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.
<b><u>Criteria</b></u>
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Florida law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. As a result of the Fair Districts Amendments, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or political party is also prohibited. The Amendments also codified VRA-type language into the Florida Constitution.
<b><u>Public Input</b></u>
While Florida law does not require public hearings, the state held such hearings between June 20 and August 31 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule. Additionally, public map submissions were accepted until November 1, 2011, and overall, 153 public maps were submitted.</process><process_rendered><p><b><u>Congressional</b></u></p>
<p>Florida's congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.</p>
<p><b><u>State Legislative</b></u></p>
<p>Florida's state legislative lines are drawn by the Legislature by joint resolution, which are not subject to the Governor's veto. Within 15 days, these plans are sent to the state Supreme Court to ensure that they meet the state's redistricting standards. If they do not, the legislature gets a second chance to draw plans. If the state Supreme Court again finds that the plans are invalid, the Court will have 60 days to draw its own maps. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 120 days before the 2022 primary.</p>
<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Florida law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. As a result of the Fair Districts Amendments, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent or political party is also prohibited. The Amendments also codified VRA-type language into the Florida Constitution.</p>
<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>
<p>While Florida law does not require public hearings, the state held such hearings between June 20 and August 31 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule. Additionally, public map submissions were accepted until November 1, 2011, and overall, 153 public maps were submitted.</p></process_rendered><issues>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when a community is packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, it may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.
Despite constitutional prohibitions, unified party control of Florida's government may lead to an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering. In the post-2010 cycle, the principal avenue for fair districts in Florida was the state Supreme Court – and this route was partially successful in 2011. In 2021, however, the Court’s composition will be very different.
- During the review of state legislative districts by the state Supreme Court in 2012, it ordered that eight state Senate districts be redrawn because of inferred partisan intent. This case was Florida's first under its Fair Districts Amendments. A few weeks later, the Legislature adopted a new Senate plan that was upheld by the Court.
- In 2014, plaintiffs challenged the validity of the 2012 congressional plan for a multitude of reasons, including partisan intent, incumbent protection, and minority packing. A final ruling was delayed due to disputes about evidence and discovery, but eventually, two districts were ordered redrawn. The Legislature drew a remedial plan, which was approved by the lower court.
- On appeal, however, the state Supreme Court held that the trial court improperly reviewed the initial challenge and ordered that eight districts, rather than two, be redrawn. Five of these showed partisan intent while three were noncompact or failed to following political and geographic boundaries. The Legislature failed to enact a remedial plan, so in late 2015, the state Supreme Court approved a map that had been adopted by the trial court.
- Following this holding, the state Senate voluntarily offered to redraw its previously revised map, believing that it violated the law in a way similar to the congressional one. A special session of the Legislature failed to produce a new Senate map, and the court adopted one of the plaintiffs' maps.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Florida is estimated to gain two congressional seats.
- In terms of representation, an unfairly drawn plan can have three to six times the effect of even the worst Census undercount. Therefore additional steps are necessary to increase the likelihood of a plan that is responsive to voters.</issues><issues_rendered><p>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when a community is packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, it may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.</p>
<p>Despite constitutional prohibitions, unified party control of Florida's government may lead to an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering. In the post-2010 cycle, the principal avenue for fair districts in Florida was the state Supreme Court – and this route was partially successful in 2011. In 2021, however, the Court’s composition will be very different.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>During the review of state legislative districts by the state Supreme Court in 2012, it ordered that eight state Senate districts be redrawn because of inferred partisan intent. This case was Florida's first under its Fair Districts Amendments. A few weeks later, the Legislature adopted a new Senate plan that was upheld by the Court.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>In 2014, plaintiffs challenged the validity of the 2012 congressional plan for a multitude of reasons, including partisan intent, incumbent protection, and minority packing. A final ruling was delayed due to disputes about evidence and discovery, but eventually, two districts were ordered redrawn. The Legislature drew a remedial plan, which was approved by the lower court.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>On appeal, however, the state Supreme Court held that the trial court improperly reviewed the initial challenge and ordered that eight districts, rather than two, be redrawn. Five of these showed partisan intent while three were noncompact or failed to following political and geographic boundaries. The Legislature failed to enact a remedial plan, so in late 2015, the state Supreme Court approved a map that had been adopted by the trial court.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Following this holding, the state Senate voluntarily offered to redraw its previously revised map, believing that it violated the law in a way similar to the congressional one. A special session of the Legislature failed to produce a new Senate map, and the court adopted one of the plaintiffs' maps.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Florida is estimated to gain two congressional seats.</p>
<ul>
<li>In terms of representation, an unfairly drawn plan can have three to six times the effect of even the worst Census undercount. Therefore additional steps are necessary to increase the likelihood of a plan that is responsive to voters.</li>
</ul></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when a community is packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, it may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.
Despite constitutional prohibitions, unified party control of Florida's government may lead to an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering. In the post-2010 cycle, the principal avenue for fair districts in Florida was the state Supreme Court – and this route was partially successful in 2011. In 2021, however, the Court’s composition will be very different.
- During the review of state legislative districts by the state Supreme Court in 2012, it ordered that eight state Senate districts be redrawn because of inferred partisan intent. This case was Florida's first under its Fair Districts Amendments. A few weeks later, the Legislature adopted a new Senate plan that was upheld by the Court.
- In 2014, plaintiffs challenged the validity of the 2012 congressional plan for a multitude of reasons, including partisan intent, incumbent protection, and minority packing. A final ruling was delayed due to disputes about evidence and discovery, but eventually, two districts were ordered redrawn. The Legislature drew a remedial plan, which was approved by the lower court.
- On appeal, however, the state Supreme Court held that the trial court improperly reviewed the initial challenge and ordered that eight districts, rather than two, be redrawn. Five of these showed partisan intent while three were noncompact or failed to following political and geographic boundaries. The Legislature failed to enact a remedial plan, so in late 2015, the state Supreme Court approved a map that had been adopted by the trial court.
- Following this holding, the state Senate voluntarily offered to redraw its previously revised map, believing that it violated the law in a way similar to the congressional one. A special session of the Legislature failed to produce a new Senate map, and the court adopted one of the plaintiffs' maps.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Florida is estimated to gain two congressional seats.
- In terms of representation, an unfairly drawn plan can have three to six times the effect of even the worst Census undercount. Therefore additional steps are necessary to increase the likelihood of a plan that is responsive to voters.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.lwvfl.org/">League of Women Voters of Florida</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/florida/">Common Cause Florida</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.floridaelectoralreform.org/">Florida Initiative for Electoral Reform</a></p>
<p><a href="https://electionscience.clas.ufl.edu/">Florida Election Science Team (FEST)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.publicmapping.org/">Public Mapping Project</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 19 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Georgia</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/GA</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Georgia redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ga/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>If racial or partisan offenses are committed in the next redistricting cycle, federal and state lawsuits.</p>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.fairdistrictsga.org/home">Fair Districts Georgia</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/georgia">League of Women Voters of Georgia</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://georgiavotes.com/">Georgia Votes</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/georgia/">Common Cause Georgia</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Georgia poses a challenge for advocates of fair districting. Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans, and there is no initiative process. This means that any redistricting reform will have to pass through the General Assembly.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>The General Assembly itself has not shied away from redistricting fights. It redrew some state House districts in 2012 and 2015, with the latter occurring without Section 5\'s preclearance requirement and leading to two lawsuits (later consolidated as <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/NAACP-Thompson_v_Kemp_Opinion-and-Order_06.01.18.pdf">Thompson v. Kemp</a>).</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>A third attempt at mid-decade redistricting occurred in 2017, but this measure <a href="https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article177888691.html">died in the state Senate</a>.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>If single-party control remains when it is time to draw new maps in 2021, there will be an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering.</p>\n<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dwight-v-raffensperger">Dwight v. Raffensperger</a>) is being considered by a federal court. The case challenges Georgia\'s 12th congressional district as allegedly diluting the votes of black voters in southeastern Georgia by cracking the population.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Georgia was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Georgia was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Georgians are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': '<p><b><u>Line-drawing Power</b></u></p>\n<p>Georgia\'s state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor\'s veto. The Legislature can override vetos with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 11 weeks prior to the 2022 primary.</p>\n<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Georgia law requires that state legislative be contiguous. The legislative guidelines for the 2011-12 redistricting <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/2egd5vpo0djzqt5/GeorgiaHouseCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf">House</a> and <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8zqyivtr8iozs8/GeorgiaSenateCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf">Senate</a> committees required that the maps avoid the "unnecessary pairing of incumbents" and consider compactness, political subdivisions, and communities of interest. However, these guidelines specify that they were not meant to limit the committees\' consideration of other factors.</p>\n<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>\n<p>While Georgia law does not require public hearings, such hearings were held between May 16 and June 30 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule.</p>', 'abbreviation': 'GA', 'actions': 'Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Georgia redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ga/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.\r\n\r\nIf racial or partisan offenses are committed in the next redistricting cycle, federal and state lawsuits.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Fair Districts Georgia](https://www.fairdistrictsga.org/home)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Georgia](https://my.lwv.org/georgia)\r\n\r\n[Georgia Votes](http://georgiavotes.com/)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Georgia](https://www.commoncause.org/georgia/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "Georgia poses a challenge for advocates of fair districting. Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans, and there is no initiative process. This means that any redistricting reform will have to pass through the General Assembly.\r\n\r\n- The General Assembly itself has not shied away from redistricting fights. It redrew some state House districts in 2012 and 2015, with the latter occurring without Section 5's preclearance requirement and leading to two lawsuits (later consolidated as [Thompson v. Kemp](https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/NAACP-Thompson_v_Kemp_Opinion-and-Order_06.01.18.pdf)).\r\n\r\n- A third attempt at mid-decade redistricting occurred in 2017, but this measure [died in the state Senate](https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article177888691.html).\r\n\r\nIf single-party control remains when it is time to draw new maps in 2021, there will be an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering.\r\n\r\nA Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Dwight v. Raffensperger](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dwight-v-raffensperger)) is being considered by a federal court. The case challenges Georgia's 12th congressional district as allegedly diluting the votes of black voters in southeastern Georgia by cracking the population.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 19, 19, 46, 55, 335859, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/GA', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Georgia', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Georgia was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Georgia was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Georgians are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': '<b><u>Line-drawing Power</b></u>\r\n\r\nGeorgia\'s state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor\'s veto. The Legislature can override vetos with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 11 weeks prior to the 2022 primary.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Criteria</b></u>\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Georgia law requires that state legislative be contiguous. The legislative guidelines for the 2011-12 redistricting [House](https://www.dropbox.com/s/2egd5vpo0djzqt5/GeorgiaHouseCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf) and [Senate](https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8zqyivtr8iozs8/GeorgiaSenateCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf) committees required that the maps avoid the "unnecessary pairing of incumbents" and consider compactness, political subdivisions, and communities of interest. However, these guidelines specify that they were not meant to limit the committees\' consideration of other factors.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Public Input</b></u>\r\n\r\nWhile Georgia law does not require public hearings, such hearings were held between May 16 and June 30 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule.', 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 0}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/GA</guid><actions>Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Georgia redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ga/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.
If racial or partisan offenses are committed in the next redistricting cycle, federal and state lawsuits.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Georgia redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ga/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Legislature as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If racial or partisan offenses are committed in the next redistricting cycle, federal and state lawsuits.</p></actions_rendered><process><b><u>Line-drawing Power</b></u>
Georgia's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetos with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 11 weeks prior to the 2022 primary.
<b><u>Criteria</b></u>
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Georgia law requires that state legislative be contiguous. The legislative guidelines for the 2011-12 redistricting [House](https://www.dropbox.com/s/2egd5vpo0djzqt5/GeorgiaHouseCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf) and [Senate](https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8zqyivtr8iozs8/GeorgiaSenateCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf) committees required that the maps avoid the "unnecessary pairing of incumbents" and consider compactness, political subdivisions, and communities of interest. However, these guidelines specify that they were not meant to limit the committees' consideration of other factors.
<b><u>Public Input</b></u>
While Georgia law does not require public hearings, such hearings were held between May 16 and June 30 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule.</process><process_rendered><p><b><u>Line-drawing Power</b></u></p>
<p>Georgia's state legislative and congressional district lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetos with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Final plans must be approved by the 2022 candidate filing deadline, which is 11 weeks prior to the 2022 primary.</p>
<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Georgia law requires that state legislative be contiguous. The legislative guidelines for the 2011-12 redistricting <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/2egd5vpo0djzqt5/GeorgiaHouseCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf">House</a> and <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/i8zqyivtr8iozs8/GeorgiaSenateCommitteeGuidelines2011-12.pdf">Senate</a> committees required that the maps avoid the "unnecessary pairing of incumbents" and consider compactness, political subdivisions, and communities of interest. However, these guidelines specify that they were not meant to limit the committees' consideration of other factors.</p>
<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>
<p>While Georgia law does not require public hearings, such hearings were held between May 16 and June 30 in the 2011 cycle. Should hearings be held again in 2021, it will likely be on a similar schedule.</p></process_rendered><issues>Georgia poses a challenge for advocates of fair districting. Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans, and there is no initiative process. This means that any redistricting reform will have to pass through the General Assembly.
- The General Assembly itself has not shied away from redistricting fights. It redrew some state House districts in 2012 and 2015, with the latter occurring without Section 5's preclearance requirement and leading to two lawsuits (later consolidated as [Thompson v. Kemp](https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/NAACP-Thompson_v_Kemp_Opinion-and-Order_06.01.18.pdf)).
- A third attempt at mid-decade redistricting occurred in 2017, but this measure [died in the state Senate](https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article177888691.html).
If single-party control remains when it is time to draw new maps in 2021, there will be an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering.
A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Dwight v. Raffensperger](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dwight-v-raffensperger)) is being considered by a federal court. The case challenges Georgia's 12th congressional district as allegedly diluting the votes of black voters in southeastern Georgia by cracking the population.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Georgia poses a challenge for advocates of fair districting. Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans, and there is no initiative process. This means that any redistricting reform will have to pass through the General Assembly.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The General Assembly itself has not shied away from redistricting fights. It redrew some state House districts in 2012 and 2015, with the latter occurring without Section 5's preclearance requirement and leading to two lawsuits (later consolidated as <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/NAACP-Thompson_v_Kemp_Opinion-and-Order_06.01.18.pdf">Thompson v. Kemp</a>).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>A third attempt at mid-decade redistricting occurred in 2017, but this measure <a href="https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article177888691.html">died in the state Senate</a>.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If single-party control remains when it is time to draw new maps in 2021, there will be an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering.</p>
<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dwight-v-raffensperger">Dwight v. Raffensperger</a>) is being considered by a federal court. The case challenges Georgia's 12th congressional district as allegedly diluting the votes of black voters in southeastern Georgia by cracking the population.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Georgia poses a challenge for advocates of fair districting. Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans, and there is no initiative process. This means that any redistricting reform will have to pass through the General Assembly.
- The General Assembly itself has not shied away from redistricting fights. It redrew some state House districts in 2012 and 2015, with the latter occurring without Section 5's preclearance requirement and leading to two lawsuits (later consolidated as [Thompson v. Kemp](https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legal-work/NAACP-Thompson_v_Kemp_Opinion-and-Order_06.01.18.pdf)).
- A third attempt at mid-decade redistricting occurred in 2017, but this measure [died in the state Senate](https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article177888691.html).
If single-party control remains when it is time to draw new maps in 2021, there will be an increased risk of partisan and racial gerrymandering.
A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Dwight v. Raffensperger](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dwight-v-raffensperger)) is being considered by a federal court. The case challenges Georgia's 12th congressional district as allegedly diluting the votes of black voters in southeastern Georgia by cracking the population.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.fairdistrictsga.org/home">Fair Districts Georgia</a></p>
<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/georgia">League of Women Voters of Georgia</a></p>
<p><a href="http://georgiavotes.com/">Georgia Votes</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/georgia/">Common Cause Georgia</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 19 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Hawaii</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/HI</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Advocate for an independent redistricting commission. </p>\n<p>Take advantage of Hawai\'i\'s extensive public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Hawai\'i redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/hi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/hawaii/">Common Cause Hawaii</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/hawaii">League of Women Voters of Hawaii</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>The success of this Commission will depend on public input.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Hawai'i has a partisan redistricting commission. Software may be available to submit plans, as it was in the previous cycle. Note that free software is being developed nationally.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Hawaii law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve communities of interest. Unduly favoring or disfavoring an a person or party is prohibited.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'HI', 'actions': 'Advocate for an independent redistricting commission. \r\n\r\nTake advantage of Hawai\'i\'s extensive public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Hawai\'i redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/hi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. \r\n\r\n- Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Common Cause Hawaii](https://www.commoncause.org/hawaii/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Hawaii](https://my.lwv.org/hawaii)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Politician Commission', 'draws_state_lines': 'Politician Commission', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'The success of this Commission will depend on public input.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 17, 4, 47, 579653, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/HI', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Hawaii', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Hawai'i has a partisan redistricting commission. Software may be available to submit plans, as it was in the previous cycle. Note that free software is being developed nationally.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Hawaii law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve communities of interest. Unduly favoring or disfavoring an a person or party is prohibited.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 2}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/HI</guid><actions>Advocate for an independent redistricting commission.
Take advantage of Hawai'i's extensive public comment process.
- Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.
- Obtain Hawai'i redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/hi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Advocate for an independent redistricting commission. </p>
<p>Take advantage of Hawai'i's extensive public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Obtain Hawai'i redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/hi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Hawai'i has a partisan redistricting commission. Software may be available to submit plans, as it was in the previous cycle. Note that free software is being developed nationally.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Hawaii law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve communities of interest. Unduly favoring or disfavoring an a person or party is prohibited.</process><process_rendered><p>Hawai'i has a partisan redistricting commission. Software may be available to submit plans, as it was in the previous cycle. Note that free software is being developed nationally.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Hawaii law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve communities of interest. Unduly favoring or disfavoring an a person or party is prohibited.</p></process_rendered><issues>The success of this Commission will depend on public input.</issues><issues_rendered><p>The success of this Commission will depend on public input.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>The success of this Commission will depend on public input.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/hawaii/">Common Cause Hawaii</a></p>
<p><a href="https://my.lwv.org/hawaii">League of Women Voters of Hawaii</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by politician commission</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by politician commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Idaho</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/ID</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Idaho redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/id/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://lwvid.org/">League of Women Voters of Idaho</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Idaho has only two congressional seats, so there is a low risk of redistricting issues there. However, redistricting of the state legislature still requires attention to ensure fair representation of minority groups.</p>\n<p>Republican members of the state legislature are pushing to increase the number of legislative districts in the state. Right now, Idaho has 35 legislative districts, which is as much as the state constitution allows. The redistricting commission that will form in 2021 has the power to cut the number of districts down to the constitutional minimum of 30. There is potential for partisan gerrymandering by increasing the number of political districts in the state.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Idaho's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by an independent redistricting commission which is evenly balanced between the two major parties. The Commission holds public meetings throughout the state while considering plans, and welcomes public input on how to draw districts.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Idaho law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Protecting a party or incumbent is prohibited.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'ID', 'actions': 'Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Idaho redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/id/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. \r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Idaho](https://lwvid.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'draws_state_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': 'Idaho has only two congressional seats, so there is a low risk of redistricting issues there. However, redistricting of the state legislature still requires attention to ensure fair representation of minority groups.\r\n\r\nRepublican members of the state legislature are pushing to increase the number of legislative districts in the state. Right now, Idaho has 35 legislative districts, which is as much as the state constitution allows. The redistricting commission that will form in 2021 has the power to cut the number of districts down to the constitutional minimum of 30. There is potential for partisan gerrymandering by increasing the number of political districts in the state.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 1, 14, 21, 17, 28, 686930, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': '', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Idaho', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Idaho's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by an independent redistricting commission which is evenly balanced between the two major parties. The Commission holds public meetings throughout the state while considering plans, and welcomes public input on how to draw districts.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Idaho law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Protecting a party or incumbent is prohibited.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 1}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/ID</guid><actions>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.
- Obtain Idaho redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/id/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Idaho redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/id/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Idaho's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by an independent redistricting commission which is evenly balanced between the two major parties. The Commission holds public meetings throughout the state while considering plans, and welcomes public input on how to draw districts.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Idaho law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Protecting a party or incumbent is prohibited.</process><process_rendered><p>Idaho's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by an independent redistricting commission which is evenly balanced between the two major parties. The Commission holds public meetings throughout the state while considering plans, and welcomes public input on how to draw districts.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Idaho law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Protecting a party or incumbent is prohibited.</p></process_rendered><issues>Idaho has only two congressional seats, so there is a low risk of redistricting issues there. However, redistricting of the state legislature still requires attention to ensure fair representation of minority groups.
Republican members of the state legislature are pushing to increase the number of legislative districts in the state. Right now, Idaho has 35 legislative districts, which is as much as the state constitution allows. The redistricting commission that will form in 2021 has the power to cut the number of districts down to the constitutional minimum of 30. There is potential for partisan gerrymandering by increasing the number of political districts in the state.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Idaho has only two congressional seats, so there is a low risk of redistricting issues there. However, redistricting of the state legislature still requires attention to ensure fair representation of minority groups.</p>
<p>Republican members of the state legislature are pushing to increase the number of legislative districts in the state. Right now, Idaho has 35 legislative districts, which is as much as the state constitution allows. The redistricting commission that will form in 2021 has the power to cut the number of districts down to the constitutional minimum of 30. There is potential for partisan gerrymandering by increasing the number of political districts in the state.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Idaho has only two congressional seats, so there is a low risk of redistricting issues there. However, redistricting of the state legislature still requires attention to ensure fair representation of minority groups.
Republican members of the state legislature are pushing to increase the number of legislative districts in the state. Right now, Idaho has 35 legislative districts, which is as much as the state constitution allows. The redistricting commission that will form in 2021 has the power to cut the number of districts down to the constitutional minimum of 30. There is potential for partisan gerrymandering by increasing the number of political districts in the state.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://lwvid.org/">League of Women Voters of Idaho</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Jan 14 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Illinois</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/IL</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Support a ballot initiative or constitutional amendment to establish an independent redistricting process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>The <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf">Fair Maps Amendment</a> has been proposed in the Illinois Legislature and has bipartisan support.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The proposed amendment would need to get a three-fifths vote in both houses before going before going to the voters in November.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>In 2021, use public input to identify communities of interest and to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Illinois redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/il/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.bettergov.org/">Better Government Association</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.changeil.org/">Change Illinois</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/illinois/">Common Cause Illinois</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.lwvil.org/">League of Women Voters of Illinois</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Illinois has multiple opportunity-to-elect districts, drawn under the guidance of <a href="http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf">state law</a>, the Voting Rights Act, and the Constitution. Overall, Illinois does not set off statistical alarms for partisan gerrymandering. Even so, both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has this same unified control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>\n<p>Illinois has a voter initiative process. Reform through such a process would reduce the risk of self-dealing by legislators. However, <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf">a constitutional amendment</a> has been introduced in the General Assembly to create a 17-member independent citizen redistricting commission. <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con14.htm">In order to succeed</a>, the amendment must pass the General Assembly by a three-fifths vote in each chamber. Then, it would need a simple majority of the voters in November.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Seven members of the commission would be from each major party with the remaining three commissioners being unaffiliated with either. These commissioners would have to reflect the diversity of the state, and no more than one commissioner may come from a particular congressional district.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The commission would have to hold at least 20 public hearings, split evenly before and after the drafting of a proposed plan. Further, these meetings would have to allow for meaningful opportunities for participation, including translation services, live-streaming, and public map submissions. Such live-streaming must include capability for virtual participation and feedback. Once a plan is released, the commission would also have to release related data.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Lastly, this amendment would get rid of the requirement of splitting state Senate districts into two state House districts. It also would require counting incarcerated persons at their last-known residences, ending prison gerrymandering in the state. Its criteria also include protections of minority groups, respect for communities of interest, and a prohibition on partisanship.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Illinois is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': '<p>Illinois\'s state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor\'s veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p><b><u>Back-up Legislative Commission</b></u></p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>If the state fails to adopt state legislative lines by June 30, 2021, a backup commission will be formed by July 10 to draw those lines. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt congressional district lines.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The Commission is made up of eight members, with a maximum of four per political party. The four legislative leaders each appoint one member of the General Assembly and one non-member to serve on the Commission.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>A plan must be approved by August 10 by a vote of at least five commissioners. If this deadline is not met, the state Supreme Court submits the names of two people of different political parties. The Secretary of State randomly chooses one of these names to serve as the ninth commissioner. The nine-member commission will have until October 5 to approve a plan.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Illinois law requires that state legislative districts be compact and contiguous. When drawing state legislative lines, each "Legislative District" elects state senators, and these get divided into two "Representative Districts," which elect state representatives. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>\n<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>\n<p>In March 2011, <a href="http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf">a redistricting transparency law</a> became effective and required four public hearings to be held in geographically distinct areas of the state. This law only applies to state legislative, not congressional, districts. In that cycle, the Senate committee held five public hearings while the House held fifteen. No hearings were held on the congressional map before it was adopted. Without a change in the law, the public can count on at least four hearings on the state legislative maps.</p>', 'abbreviation': 'IL', 'actions': 'Support a ballot initiative or constitutional amendment to establish an independent redistricting process.\r\n\r\n- The [Fair Maps Amendment](http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf) has been proposed in the Illinois Legislature and has bipartisan support.\r\n\r\n- The proposed amendment would need to get a three-fifths vote in both houses before going before going to the voters in November.\r\n\r\nIn 2021, use public input to identify communities of interest and to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Illinois redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/il/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': 5, 'contacts': '[Better Government Association](https://www.bettergov.org/)\r\n\r\n[Change Illinois](http://www.changeil.org/)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Illinois](https://www.commoncause.org/illinois/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Illinois](https://www.lwvil.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'Illinois has multiple opportunity-to-elect districts, drawn under the guidance of [state law](http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf), the Voting Rights Act, and the Constitution. Overall, Illinois does not set off statistical alarms for partisan gerrymandering. Even so, both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has this same unified control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.\r\n\r\nIllinois has a voter initiative process. Reform through such a process would reduce the risk of self-dealing by legislators. However, [a constitutional amendment](http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf) has been introduced in the General Assembly to create a 17-member independent citizen redistricting commission. [In order to succeed](http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con14.htm), the amendment must pass the General Assembly by a three-fifths vote in each chamber. Then, it would need a simple majority of the voters in November.\r\n\r\n- Seven members of the commission would be from each major party with the remaining three commissioners being unaffiliated with either. These commissioners would have to reflect the diversity of the state, and no more than one commissioner may come from a particular congressional district.\r\n\r\n- The commission would have to hold at least 20 public hearings, split evenly before and after the drafting of a proposed plan. Further, these meetings would have to allow for meaningful opportunities for participation, including translation services, live-streaming, and public map submissions. Such live-streaming must include capability for virtual participation and feedback. Once a plan is released, the commission would also have to release related data.\r\n\r\n- Lastly, this amendment would get rid of the requirement of splitting state Senate districts into two state House districts. It also would require counting incarcerated persons at their last-known residences, ending prison gerrymandering in the state. Its criteria also include protections of minority groups, respect for communities of interest, and a prohibition on partisanship.\r\n\r\nBased upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Illinois is estimated to lose one congressional seat.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 19, 15, 10, 2, 869598, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/IL', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Illinois', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': 'Illinois\'s state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor\'s veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Back-up Legislative Commission</b></u>\r\n\r\n- If the state fails to adopt state legislative lines by June 30, 2021, a backup commission will be formed by July 10 to draw those lines. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt congressional district lines.\r\n\r\n- The Commission is made up of eight members, with a maximum of four per political party. The four legislative leaders each appoint one member of the General Assembly and one non-member to serve on the Commission.\r\n\r\n- A plan must be approved by August 10 by a vote of at least five commissioners. If this deadline is not met, the state Supreme Court submits the names of two people of different political parties. The Secretary of State randomly chooses one of these names to serve as the ninth commissioner. The nine-member commission will have until October 5 to approve a plan.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Criteria</b></u>\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Illinois law requires that state legislative districts be compact and contiguous. When drawing state legislative lines, each "Legislative District" elects state senators, and these get divided into two "Representative Districts," which elect state representatives. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Public Input</b></u>\r\n\r\nIn March 2011, [a redistricting transparency law](http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf) became effective and required four public hearings to be held in geographically distinct areas of the state. This law only applies to state legislative, not congressional, districts. In that cycle, the Senate committee held five public hearings while the House held fifteen. No hearings were held on the congressional map before it was adopted. Without a change in the law, the public can count on at least four hearings on the state legislative maps.', 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 3}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/IL</guid><actions>Support a ballot initiative or constitutional amendment to establish an independent redistricting process.
- The [Fair Maps Amendment](http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf) has been proposed in the Illinois Legislature and has bipartisan support.
- The proposed amendment would need to get a three-fifths vote in both houses before going before going to the voters in November.
In 2021, use public input to identify communities of interest and to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Illinois redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/il/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Support a ballot initiative or constitutional amendment to establish an independent redistricting process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf">Fair Maps Amendment</a> has been proposed in the Illinois Legislature and has bipartisan support.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The proposed amendment would need to get a three-fifths vote in both houses before going before going to the voters in November.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>In 2021, use public input to identify communities of interest and to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Illinois redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/il/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Illinois's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.
<b><u>Back-up Legislative Commission</b></u>
- If the state fails to adopt state legislative lines by June 30, 2021, a backup commission will be formed by July 10 to draw those lines. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt congressional district lines.
- The Commission is made up of eight members, with a maximum of four per political party. The four legislative leaders each appoint one member of the General Assembly and one non-member to serve on the Commission.
- A plan must be approved by August 10 by a vote of at least five commissioners. If this deadline is not met, the state Supreme Court submits the names of two people of different political parties. The Secretary of State randomly chooses one of these names to serve as the ninth commissioner. The nine-member commission will have until October 5 to approve a plan.
<b><u>Criteria</b></u>
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Illinois law requires that state legislative districts be compact and contiguous. When drawing state legislative lines, each "Legislative District" elects state senators, and these get divided into two "Representative Districts," which elect state representatives. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.
<b><u>Public Input</b></u>
In March 2011, [a redistricting transparency law](http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf) became effective and required four public hearings to be held in geographically distinct areas of the state. This law only applies to state legislative, not congressional, districts. In that cycle, the Senate committee held five public hearings while the House held fifteen. No hearings were held on the congressional map before it was adopted. Without a change in the law, the public can count on at least four hearings on the state legislative maps.</process><process_rendered><p>Illinois's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.</p>
<p><b><u>Back-up Legislative Commission</b></u></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>If the state fails to adopt state legislative lines by June 30, 2021, a backup commission will be formed by July 10 to draw those lines. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt congressional district lines.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The Commission is made up of eight members, with a maximum of four per political party. The four legislative leaders each appoint one member of the General Assembly and one non-member to serve on the Commission.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>A plan must be approved by August 10 by a vote of at least five commissioners. If this deadline is not met, the state Supreme Court submits the names of two people of different political parties. The Secretary of State randomly chooses one of these names to serve as the ninth commissioner. The nine-member commission will have until October 5 to approve a plan.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><b><u>Criteria</b></u></p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Illinois law requires that state legislative districts be compact and contiguous. When drawing state legislative lines, each "Legislative District" elects state senators, and these get divided into two "Representative Districts," which elect state representatives. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>
<p><b><u>Public Input</b></u></p>
<p>In March 2011, <a href="http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf">a redistricting transparency law</a> became effective and required four public hearings to be held in geographically distinct areas of the state. This law only applies to state legislative, not congressional, districts. In that cycle, the Senate committee held five public hearings while the House held fifteen. No hearings were held on the congressional map before it was adopted. Without a change in the law, the public can count on at least four hearings on the state legislative maps.</p></process_rendered><issues>Illinois has multiple opportunity-to-elect districts, drawn under the guidance of [state law](http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf), the Voting Rights Act, and the Constitution. Overall, Illinois does not set off statistical alarms for partisan gerrymandering. Even so, both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has this same unified control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.
Illinois has a voter initiative process. Reform through such a process would reduce the risk of self-dealing by legislators. However, [a constitutional amendment](http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf) has been introduced in the General Assembly to create a 17-member independent citizen redistricting commission. [In order to succeed](http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con14.htm), the amendment must pass the General Assembly by a three-fifths vote in each chamber. Then, it would need a simple majority of the voters in November.
- Seven members of the commission would be from each major party with the remaining three commissioners being unaffiliated with either. These commissioners would have to reflect the diversity of the state, and no more than one commissioner may come from a particular congressional district.
- The commission would have to hold at least 20 public hearings, split evenly before and after the drafting of a proposed plan. Further, these meetings would have to allow for meaningful opportunities for participation, including translation services, live-streaming, and public map submissions. Such live-streaming must include capability for virtual participation and feedback. Once a plan is released, the commission would also have to release related data.
- Lastly, this amendment would get rid of the requirement of splitting state Senate districts into two state House districts. It also would require counting incarcerated persons at their last-known residences, ending prison gerrymandering in the state. Its criteria also include protections of minority groups, respect for communities of interest, and a prohibition on partisanship.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Illinois is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Illinois has multiple opportunity-to-elect districts, drawn under the guidance of <a href="http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf">state law</a>, the Voting Rights Act, and the Constitution. Overall, Illinois does not set off statistical alarms for partisan gerrymandering. Even so, both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has this same unified control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>
<p>Illinois has a voter initiative process. Reform through such a process would reduce the risk of self-dealing by legislators. However, <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf">a constitutional amendment</a> has been introduced in the General Assembly to create a 17-member independent citizen redistricting commission. <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con14.htm">In order to succeed</a>, the amendment must pass the General Assembly by a three-fifths vote in each chamber. Then, it would need a simple majority of the voters in November.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Seven members of the commission would be from each major party with the remaining three commissioners being unaffiliated with either. These commissioners would have to reflect the diversity of the state, and no more than one commissioner may come from a particular congressional district.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The commission would have to hold at least 20 public hearings, split evenly before and after the drafting of a proposed plan. Further, these meetings would have to allow for meaningful opportunities for participation, including translation services, live-streaming, and public map submissions. Such live-streaming must include capability for virtual participation and feedback. Once a plan is released, the commission would also have to release related data.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Lastly, this amendment would get rid of the requirement of splitting state Senate districts into two state House districts. It also would require counting incarcerated persons at their last-known residences, ending prison gerrymandering in the state. Its criteria also include protections of minority groups, respect for communities of interest, and a prohibition on partisanship.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Illinois is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Illinois has multiple opportunity-to-elect districts, drawn under the guidance of [state law](http://ilga.gov/legislation/96/SB/PDF/09600SB3976lv.pdf), the Voting Rights Act, and the Constitution. Overall, Illinois does not set off statistical alarms for partisan gerrymandering. Even so, both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Democrats. If the party has this same unified control when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.
Illinois has a voter initiative process. Reform through such a process would reduce the risk of self-dealing by legislators. However, [a constitutional amendment](http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/101/HJRCA/PDF/10100HC0041lv.pdf) has been introduced in the General Assembly to create a 17-member independent citizen redistricting commission. [In order to succeed](http://www.ilga.gov/commission/lrb/con14.htm), the amendment must pass the General Assembly by a three-fifths vote in each chamber. Then, it would need a simple majority of the voters in November.
- Seven members of the commission would be from each major party with the remaining three commissioners being unaffiliated with either. These commissioners would have to reflect the diversity of the state, and no more than one commissioner may come from a particular congressional district.
- The commission would have to hold at least 20 public hearings, split evenly before and after the drafting of a proposed plan. Further, these meetings would have to allow for meaningful opportunities for participation, including translation services, live-streaming, and public map submissions. Such live-streaming must include capability for virtual participation and feedback. Once a plan is released, the commission would also have to release related data.
- Lastly, this amendment would get rid of the requirement of splitting state Senate districts into two state House districts. It also would require counting incarcerated persons at their last-known residences, ending prison gerrymandering in the state. Its criteria also include protections of minority groups, respect for communities of interest, and a prohibition on partisanship.
Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Illinois is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.bettergov.org/">Better Government Association</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.changeil.org/">Change Illinois</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/illinois/">Common Cause Illinois</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.lwvil.org/">League of Women Voters of Illinois</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 19 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Indiana</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/IN</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.</p>\n<p>In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Indiana redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/in/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.allinfordemocracy.org/">All IN For Democracy</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://indianalocalredistricting.com/">Indiana Local Government Redistricting</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.aclu-in.org/">ACLU of Indiana</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.lwvin.org/">League of Women Voters of Indiana</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Republican win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Democratic win will lead to bipartisan control.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans. If the party maintains those majorities when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Indiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority in each chamber. If the state fails to adopt congressional districts, a backup commission is formed to draw them. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt state legislative district lines.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Indiana law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'IN', 'actions': 'In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.\r\n\r\nIn 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Indiana redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/in/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[All IN For Democracy](https://www.allinfordemocracy.org/)\r\n\r\n[Indiana Local Government Redistricting](https://indianalocalredistricting.com/)\r\n\r\n[ACLU of Indiana](https://www.aclu-in.org/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Indiana](http://www.lwvin.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': 'The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Republican win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Democratic win will lead to bipartisan control.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 17, 32, 21, 465331, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/IN', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Indiana', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'Both chambers of the Legislature and the Governorship are controlled by Republicans. If the party maintains those majorities when it is time to draw new maps, there will be an increased risk of partisan gerrymandering.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Indiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority in each chamber. If the state fails to adopt congressional districts, a backup commission is formed to draw them. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt state legislative district lines.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Indiana law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 0}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/IN</guid><actions>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.
In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Indiana redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/in/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.</p>
<p>In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Indiana redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/in/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Indiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority in each chamber. If the state fails to adopt congressional districts, a backup commission is formed to draw them. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt state legislative district lines.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Indiana law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</process><process_rendered><p>Indiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority in each chamber. If the state fails to adopt congressional districts, a backup commission is formed to draw them. There is no backup commission in the event of a failure to adopt state legislative district lines.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Indiana law requires that state legislative districts be contiguous. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p></process_rendered><issues>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Republican win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Democratic win will lead to bipartisan control.</issues><issues_rendered><p>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Republican win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Democratic win will lead to bipartisan control.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>The Governorship is up for election in November 2020. A Republican win will lead to continued single-party control over redistricting. A Democratic win will lead to bipartisan control.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.allinfordemocracy.org/">All IN For Democracy</a></p>
<p><a href="https://indianalocalredistricting.com/">Indiana Local Government Redistricting</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aclu-in.org/">ACLU of Indiana</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lwvin.org/">League of Women Voters of Indiana</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Iowa</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/IA</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Advocate for the existing system at the state Legislature, in the press, and in your community. </p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Iowa redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ia/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.lwvia.org/">League of Women Voters of Iowa</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.aclu-ia.org/">ACLU of Iowa</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': "<p>Iowa has a public comment process. This is a central method by which voters can weigh in on the drawing of congressional and state legislative lines.</p>\n<p>Iowa currently has a Republican trifecta. The Democratic party need only flip four seats to create split control of the Legislature, which accepts or rejects the state's new maps. Although Iowa's redistricting process is typically uncontroversial, breaking this trifecta in 2020 would create an additional roadblock to gerrymandering in 2021.</p>", '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Iowa has one of the nation's first redistricting commission processes. Civil servants, guided by a bipartisan committee, draft up to three maps, which the Legislature can accept or reject (or modify, after a certain number of rejections). The success of this process depends on courtesy between legislators and a respect for democratic norms.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Iowa law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, person, or group.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'IA', 'actions': 'Advocate for the existing system at the state Legislature, in the press, and in your community. \r\n\r\n- Obtain Iowa redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ia/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. \r\n\r\n- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': 4, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Iowa](https://www.lwvia.org/)\r\n\r\n[ACLU of Iowa](https://www.aclu-ia.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Hybrid commission system', 'draws_state_lines': 'Hybrid commission system', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "Iowa has a public comment process. This is a central method by which voters can weigh in on the drawing of congressional and state legislative lines.\r\n\r\nIowa currently has a Republican trifecta. The Democratic party need only flip four seats to create split control of the Legislature, which accepts or rejects the state's new maps. Although Iowa's redistricting process is typically uncontroversial, breaking this trifecta in 2020 would create an additional roadblock to gerrymandering in 2021.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 11, 25, 15, 28, 5, 546650, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/IA', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Iowa', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Iowa has one of the nation's first redistricting commission processes. Civil servants, guided by a bipartisan committee, draft up to three maps, which the Legislature can accept or reject (or modify, after a certain number of rejections). The success of this process depends on courtesy between legislators and a respect for democratic norms.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Iowa law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, person, or group.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 2}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/IA</guid><actions>Advocate for the existing system at the state Legislature, in the press, and in your community.
- Obtain Iowa redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ia/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Advocate for the existing system at the state Legislature, in the press, and in your community. </p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Iowa redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ia/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit these maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Iowa has one of the nation's first redistricting commission processes. Civil servants, guided by a bipartisan committee, draft up to three maps, which the Legislature can accept or reject (or modify, after a certain number of rejections). The success of this process depends on courtesy between legislators and a respect for democratic norms.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Iowa law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, person, or group.</process><process_rendered><p>Iowa has one of the nation's first redistricting commission processes. Civil servants, guided by a bipartisan committee, draft up to three maps, which the Legislature can accept or reject (or modify, after a certain number of rejections). The success of this process depends on courtesy between legislators and a respect for democratic norms.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Iowa law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Consideration of partisan data is prohibited except where required by federal law, as is intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, person, or group.</p></process_rendered><issues>Iowa has a public comment process. This is a central method by which voters can weigh in on the drawing of congressional and state legislative lines.
Iowa currently has a Republican trifecta. The Democratic party need only flip four seats to create split control of the Legislature, which accepts or rejects the state's new maps. Although Iowa's redistricting process is typically uncontroversial, breaking this trifecta in 2020 would create an additional roadblock to gerrymandering in 2021.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Iowa has a public comment process. This is a central method by which voters can weigh in on the drawing of congressional and state legislative lines.</p>
<p>Iowa currently has a Republican trifecta. The Democratic party need only flip four seats to create split control of the Legislature, which accepts or rejects the state's new maps. Although Iowa's redistricting process is typically uncontroversial, breaking this trifecta in 2020 would create an additional roadblock to gerrymandering in 2021.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Iowa has a public comment process. This is a central method by which voters can weigh in on the drawing of congressional and state legislative lines.
Iowa currently has a Republican trifecta. The Democratic party need only flip four seats to create split control of the Legislature, which accepts or rejects the state's new maps. Although Iowa's redistricting process is typically uncontroversial, breaking this trifecta in 2020 would create an additional roadblock to gerrymandering in 2021.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.lwvia.org/">League of Women Voters of Iowa</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aclu-ia.org/">ACLU of Iowa</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by hybrid commission system</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by hybrid commission system</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Nov 25 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Kansas</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/KS</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.</p>\n<p>In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Kansas redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ks/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://lwvk.org/">League of Women Voters of Kansas</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.aclukansas.org/">ACLU of Kansas</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': "<p>The GOP-controlled Legislature currently has a supermajority in both House and Senate, enough to override the Governor's veto on a redistricting plan. A change of two seats in House or Senate would undo the supermajority.</p>", '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Kansas's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kansas law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and avoid pairing incumbents. Kansas law requires that the state's congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and preserve the cores of prior districts.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'KS', 'actions': 'In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.\r\n\r\nIn 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Kansas redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ks/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Kansas](https://lwvk.org/)\r\n\r\n[ACLU of Kansas](https://www.aclukansas.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': "The GOP-controlled Legislature currently has a supermajority in both House and Senate, enough to override the Governor's veto on a redistricting plan. A change of two seats in House or Senate would undo the supermajority.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 17, 37, 25, 763879, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/KS', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Kansas', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Kansas's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kansas law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and avoid pairing incumbents. Kansas law requires that the state's congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and preserve the cores of prior districts.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 4}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/KS</guid><actions>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.
In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Kansas redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ks/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.</p>
<p>In 2021, use public input to persuade the Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Kansas redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ks/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Kansas's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kansas law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and avoid pairing incumbents. Kansas law requires that the state's congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and preserve the cores of prior districts.</process><process_rendered><p>Kansas's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kansas law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and avoid pairing incumbents. Kansas law requires that the state's congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, preserve communities of interest, and preserve the cores of prior districts.</p></process_rendered><issues>The GOP-controlled Legislature currently has a supermajority in both House and Senate, enough to override the Governor's veto on a redistricting plan. A change of two seats in House or Senate would undo the supermajority.</issues><issues_rendered><p>The GOP-controlled Legislature currently has a supermajority in both House and Senate, enough to override the Governor's veto on a redistricting plan. A change of two seats in House or Senate would undo the supermajority.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>The GOP-controlled Legislature currently has a supermajority in both House and Senate, enough to override the Governor's veto on a redistricting plan. A change of two seats in House or Senate would undo the supermajority.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://lwvk.org/">League of Women Voters of Kansas</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aclukansas.org/">ACLU of Kansas</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Kentucky</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/KY</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>The League of Women Voters of Kentucky is seeking sponsors for legislation that would create a redistricting advisory commission to draw the lines for Kentucky’s next state and federal legislative districts following the 2020 census. Partner with them to advocate for redistricting reform!</p>\n<p>The entire state legislature is up for re-election in 2020. A majority-reform coalition or split control of state power could check the worst gerrymandering impulses in 2021.</p>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://lwvky.org/">League of Women Voters of Kentucky</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/states/common-cause-kentucky/">Common Cause Kentucky</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.togetherfrankfort.org/">Together Frankfort</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Kentucky presents a challenging case for advocates of fair districting. There is no public comment process, and redistricting is under single-party control. Even with a Democrat as governor, Republicans can override a veto to a redistricting plan by a simple majority vote.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Kentucky's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kentucky law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. Additionally, the state's congressional districts must also preserve communities of interest.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'KY', 'actions': 'The League of Women Voters of Kentucky is seeking sponsors for legislation that would create a redistricting advisory commission to draw the lines for Kentucky’s next state and federal legislative districts following the 2020 census. Partner with them to advocate for redistricting reform!\r\n\r\nThe entire state legislature is up for re-election in 2020. A majority-reform coalition or split control of state power could check the worst gerrymandering impulses in 2021.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Kentucky](https://lwvky.org/)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Kentucky](https://www.commoncause.org/states/common-cause-kentucky/)\r\n\r\n[Together Frankfort](http://www.togetherfrankfort.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'Kentucky presents a challenging case for advocates of fair districting. There is no public comment process, and redistricting is under single-party control. Even with a Democrat as governor, Republicans can override a veto to a redistricting plan by a simple majority vote.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 1, 14, 21, 29, 18, 652389, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/KY', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Kentucky', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Kentucky's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kentucky law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. Additionally, the state's congressional districts must also preserve communities of interest.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 4}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/KY</guid><actions>The League of Women Voters of Kentucky is seeking sponsors for legislation that would create a redistricting advisory commission to draw the lines for Kentucky’s next state and federal legislative districts following the 2020 census. Partner with them to advocate for redistricting reform!
The entire state legislature is up for re-election in 2020. A majority-reform coalition or split control of state power could check the worst gerrymandering impulses in 2021.</actions><actions_rendered><p>The League of Women Voters of Kentucky is seeking sponsors for legislation that would create a redistricting advisory commission to draw the lines for Kentucky’s next state and federal legislative districts following the 2020 census. Partner with them to advocate for redistricting reform!</p>
<p>The entire state legislature is up for re-election in 2020. A majority-reform coalition or split control of state power could check the worst gerrymandering impulses in 2021.</p></actions_rendered><process>Kentucky's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kentucky law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. Additionally, the state's congressional districts must also preserve communities of interest.</process><process_rendered><p>Kentucky's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a simple majority vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Kentucky law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. Additionally, the state's congressional districts must also preserve communities of interest.</p></process_rendered><issues>Kentucky presents a challenging case for advocates of fair districting. There is no public comment process, and redistricting is under single-party control. Even with a Democrat as governor, Republicans can override a veto to a redistricting plan by a simple majority vote.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Kentucky presents a challenging case for advocates of fair districting. There is no public comment process, and redistricting is under single-party control. Even with a Democrat as governor, Republicans can override a veto to a redistricting plan by a simple majority vote.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Kentucky presents a challenging case for advocates of fair districting. There is no public comment process, and redistricting is under single-party control. Even with a Democrat as governor, Republicans can override a veto to a redistricting plan by a simple majority vote.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://lwvky.org/">League of Women Voters of Kentucky</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/states/common-cause-kentucky/">Common Cause Kentucky</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.togetherfrankfort.org/">Together Frankfort</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Jan 14 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Louisiana</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/LA</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>In 2019, support gubernatorial and state legislative candidates who favor fair districting. The 2019 gubernatorial and state legislative elections will determine whether 2021 redistricting will occur under single-party or split-party control.</p>\n<p>In 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Louisiana redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/la/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use free software such as <a href="https://planscore.org">PlanScore</a> to analyze draft maps for undue partisanship or ill treatment of minority groups.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>If racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.</p>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://fairdistrictsla.org/">Fair Districts Louisiana</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/states/common-cause-louisiana/">Common Cause Louisiana</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://lwvofla.org/">League of Women Voters of Louisiana</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>On Nov. 16, 2019, Gov. John Bel Edwards won re-election, keeping split-party control over the redistricting process in Louisiana. In addition, state House Republicans are now two votes shy of the supermajority required to override Edwards’ veto. Edwards has veto power over redistricting. To overcome a gubernatorial veto of a redistricting plan, the state House Republicans would need to pick up at least two votes. Those votes could potentially come from black Democrats, who may favor having larger margins of victory in less districts to ensure wins rather than spreading black votes for narrower wins in more districts.</p>\n<p>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.</p>\n<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 claim (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/johnson-v-ardoin">Johnson v. Ardoin</a>) is being considered in federal court. The case is challenging Louisiana\'s 5th and 6th congressional districts as cracking minority voters and the 2nd congressional district as packing minority voters.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Louisiana was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Louisiana was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Louisianans are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Louisiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Louisiana law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve the cores of prior districts.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'LA', 'actions': "In 2019, support gubernatorial and state legislative candidates who favor fair districting. The 2019 gubernatorial and state legislative elections will determine whether 2021 redistricting will occur under single-party or split-party control.\r\n\r\nIn 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Louisiana redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/la/).\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Use free software such as [PlanScore](https://planscore.org) to analyze draft maps for undue partisanship or ill treatment of minority groups.\r\n\r\nIf racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Fair Districts Louisiana](https://fairdistrictsla.org/)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Louisiana](https://www.commoncause.org/states/common-cause-louisiana/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Louisiana](https://lwvofla.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': "On Nov. 16, 2019, Gov. John Bel Edwards won re-election, keeping split-party control over the redistricting process in Louisiana. In addition, state House Republicans are now two votes shy of the supermajority required to override Edwards’ veto. Edwards has veto power over redistricting. To overcome a gubernatorial veto of a redistricting plan, the state House Republicans would need to pick up at least two votes. Those votes could potentially come from black Democrats, who may favor having larger margins of victory in less districts to ensure wins rather than spreading black votes for narrower wins in more districts.\r\n\r\nThe Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.\r\n\r\nA Voting Rights Act Section 2 claim ([Johnson v. Ardoin](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/johnson-v-ardoin)) is being considered in federal court. The case is challenging Louisiana's 5th and 6th congressional districts as cracking minority voters and the 2nd congressional district as packing minority voters.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 11, 18, 16, 26, 59, 918698, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/LA', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Louisiana', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Louisiana was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Louisiana was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Louisianans are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Louisiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Louisiana law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve the cores of prior districts.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 4}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/LA</guid><actions>In 2019, support gubernatorial and state legislative candidates who favor fair districting. The 2019 gubernatorial and state legislative elections will determine whether 2021 redistricting will occur under single-party or split-party control.
In 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.
- Obtain Louisiana redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/la/).
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Use free software such as [PlanScore](https://planscore.org) to analyze draft maps for undue partisanship or ill treatment of minority groups.
If racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.</actions><actions_rendered><p>In 2019, support gubernatorial and state legislative candidates who favor fair districting. The 2019 gubernatorial and state legislative elections will determine whether 2021 redistricting will occur under single-party or split-party control.</p>
<p>In 2021, use public comment to identify communities of interest.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Louisiana redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/la/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use free software such as <a href="https://planscore.org">PlanScore</a> to analyze draft maps for undue partisanship or ill treatment of minority groups.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If racial or partisan offenses are committed by the Legislature, federal and state lawsuits.</p></actions_rendered><process>Louisiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Louisiana law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve the cores of prior districts.</process><process_rendered><p>Louisiana's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Louisiana law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve the cores of prior districts.</p></process_rendered><issues>On Nov. 16, 2019, Gov. John Bel Edwards won re-election, keeping split-party control over the redistricting process in Louisiana. In addition, state House Republicans are now two votes shy of the supermajority required to override Edwards’ veto. Edwards has veto power over redistricting. To overcome a gubernatorial veto of a redistricting plan, the state House Republicans would need to pick up at least two votes. Those votes could potentially come from black Democrats, who may favor having larger margins of victory in less districts to ensure wins rather than spreading black votes for narrower wins in more districts.
The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.
A Voting Rights Act Section 2 claim ([Johnson v. Ardoin](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/johnson-v-ardoin)) is being considered in federal court. The case is challenging Louisiana's 5th and 6th congressional districts as cracking minority voters and the 2nd congressional district as packing minority voters.</issues><issues_rendered><p>On Nov. 16, 2019, Gov. John Bel Edwards won re-election, keeping split-party control over the redistricting process in Louisiana. In addition, state House Republicans are now two votes shy of the supermajority required to override Edwards’ veto. Edwards has veto power over redistricting. To overcome a gubernatorial veto of a redistricting plan, the state House Republicans would need to pick up at least two votes. Those votes could potentially come from black Democrats, who may favor having larger margins of victory in less districts to ensure wins rather than spreading black votes for narrower wins in more districts.</p>
<p>The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.</p>
<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 claim (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/johnson-v-ardoin">Johnson v. Ardoin</a>) is being considered in federal court. The case is challenging Louisiana's 5th and 6th congressional districts as cracking minority voters and the 2nd congressional district as packing minority voters.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>On Nov. 16, 2019, Gov. John Bel Edwards won re-election, keeping split-party control over the redistricting process in Louisiana. In addition, state House Republicans are now two votes shy of the supermajority required to override Edwards’ veto. Edwards has veto power over redistricting. To overcome a gubernatorial veto of a redistricting plan, the state House Republicans would need to pick up at least two votes. Those votes could potentially come from black Democrats, who may favor having larger margins of victory in less districts to ensure wins rather than spreading black votes for narrower wins in more districts.
The Voting Rights Act and the Constitution currently guarantee that minority populations should have fair opportunities to elect representatives. But when blacks are packed to be 50% or more of the voting-eligible population of a district, they may miss opportunities in neighboring districts. Fair districting therefore requires careful attention to how the lines are drawn.
A Voting Rights Act Section 2 claim ([Johnson v. Ardoin](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/johnson-v-ardoin)) is being considered in federal court. The case is challenging Louisiana's 5th and 6th congressional districts as cracking minority voters and the 2nd congressional district as packing minority voters.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://fairdistrictsla.org/">Fair Districts Louisiana</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/states/common-cause-louisiana/">Common Cause Louisiana</a></p>
<p><a href="https://lwvofla.org/">League of Women Voters of Louisiana</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Nov 18 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Maine</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/ME</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Defend the advisory system while advocating for further reforms.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Write to your local news organization in support of the advisory commission. Make noise!</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Maine redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/me/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="http://www.lwvme.org/">League of Women Voters of Maine</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>The success of this commission will depend on public input.</p>\n<p>Maine has a ballot initiative process.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': '<p>Maine has an advisory commission that makes recommendations to the Legislature, which can accept, modify, or reject the recommendations. Any map it adopts must be by a two-thirds vote in each chamber of the Legislature.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maine law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions.</p>', 'abbreviation': 'ME', 'actions': 'Defend the advisory system while advocating for further reforms.\r\n\r\n- Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.\r\n\r\n- Write to your local news organization in support of the advisory commission. Make noise!\r\n\r\n- Obtain Maine redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/me/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.\r\n\r\n- Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[League of Women Voters of Maine](http://www.lwvme.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': 'The success of this commission will depend on public input.\r\n\r\nMaine has a ballot initiative process.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 18, 7, 54, 323312, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/states/2018/ME', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Maine', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': 'Maine has an advisory commission that makes recommendations to the Legislature, which can accept, modify, or reject the recommendations. Any map it adopts must be by a two-thirds vote in each chamber of the Legislature.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maine law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions.', 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 2}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/ME</guid><actions>Defend the advisory system while advocating for further reforms.
- Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.
- Write to your local news organization in support of the advisory commission. Make noise!
- Obtain Maine redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/me/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Defend the advisory system while advocating for further reforms.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Write to your local news organization in support of the advisory commission. Make noise!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Obtain Maine redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/me/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Maine has an advisory commission that makes recommendations to the Legislature, which can accept, modify, or reject the recommendations. Any map it adopts must be by a two-thirds vote in each chamber of the Legislature.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maine law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions.</process><process_rendered><p>Maine has an advisory commission that makes recommendations to the Legislature, which can accept, modify, or reject the recommendations. Any map it adopts must be by a two-thirds vote in each chamber of the Legislature.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maine law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions.</p></process_rendered><issues>The success of this commission will depend on public input.
Maine has a ballot initiative process.</issues><issues_rendered><p>The success of this commission will depend on public input.</p>
<p>Maine has a ballot initiative process.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>The success of this commission will depend on public input.
Maine has a ballot initiative process.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="http://www.lwvme.org/">League of Women Voters of Maine</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Maryland</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MD</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>During redistricting, weigh in with your Delegate or state Senator. Emphasize the importance of a bipartisan plan that reflects all Marylanders\' priorities, and of working with the Governor.</p>\n<p>Use public input to persuade the Governor and Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Maryland redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/md/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/maryland/">Common Cause Maryland</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.lwvmd.org/">League of Women Voters of Maryland</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>In 2011, Maryland Democrats drew a congressional gerrymander to take the Sixth Congressional District from Republicans. This was the subject of a high-profile test case before the Supreme Court, Benisek v. Lamone.</p>\n<p>In 2021, redistricting will be done under split-party control. There will be no elections between now and redistricting. Democrats have legislative supermajorities, opening the possibility that they could override of a veto by Republican Governor Larry Hogan. However, a switch of four Senate votes or fifteen votes in the House of Delegates would bring Democrats below supermajority threshold.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Maryland's state legislative districts are first drawn by the Governor and, typically, an advisory commission he appoints. The Governor must present this plan to the state Legislature on the first day of its regular session in 2022. The state Legislature also has the option of drawing its own districts, separate from the Governor's process. The state Legislature may adopt its own maps through a joint resolution, which requires no action by the Governor, so if the resolution passes, it is not subject to a gubernatorial veto. If the state Legislature fails to adopt its own plans within 45 days of the release of the Governor's maps, the Governor's maps are adopted.</p>\n<p>Maryland's congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maryland law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'MD', 'actions': "During redistricting, weigh in with your Delegate or state Senator. Emphasize the importance of a bipartisan plan that reflects all Marylanders' priorities, and of working with the Governor.\r\n\r\nUse public input to persuade the Governor and Legislature to draw fair districts.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Maryland redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/md/).\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.", 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Common Cause Maryland](https://www.commoncause.org/maryland/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Maryland](https://www.lwvmd.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Governor and Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': 'In 2011, Maryland Democrats drew a congressional gerrymander to take the Sixth Congressional District from Republicans. This was the subject of a high-profile test case before the Supreme Court, Benisek v. Lamone.\r\n\r\nIn 2021, redistricting will be done under split-party control. There will be no elections between now and redistricting. Democrats have legislative supermajorities, opening the possibility that they could override of a veto by Republican Governor Larry Hogan. However, a switch of four Senate votes or fifteen votes in the House of Delegates would bring Democrats below supermajority threshold.', 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 7, 22, 17, 0, 339977, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/MD', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Maryland', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Maryland's state legislative districts are first drawn by the Governor and, typically, an advisory commission he appoints. The Governor must present this plan to the state Legislature on the first day of its regular session in 2022. The state Legislature also has the option of drawing its own districts, separate from the Governor's process. The state Legislature may adopt its own maps through a joint resolution, which requires no action by the Governor, so if the resolution passes, it is not subject to a gubernatorial veto. If the state Legislature fails to adopt its own plans within 45 days of the release of the Governor's maps, the Governor's maps are adopted.\r\n\r\nMaryland's congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maryland law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 4}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MD</guid><actions>During redistricting, weigh in with your Delegate or state Senator. Emphasize the importance of a bipartisan plan that reflects all Marylanders' priorities, and of working with the Governor.
Use public input to persuade the Governor and Legislature to draw fair districts.
- Obtain Maryland redistricting data from [OpenPrecincts](https://openprecincts.org/md/).
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>During redistricting, weigh in with your Delegate or state Senator. Emphasize the importance of a bipartisan plan that reflects all Marylanders' priorities, and of working with the Governor.</p>
<p>Use public input to persuade the Governor and Legislature to draw fair districts.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Maryland redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/md/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Maryland's state legislative districts are first drawn by the Governor and, typically, an advisory commission he appoints. The Governor must present this plan to the state Legislature on the first day of its regular session in 2022. The state Legislature also has the option of drawing its own districts, separate from the Governor's process. The state Legislature may adopt its own maps through a joint resolution, which requires no action by the Governor, so if the resolution passes, it is not subject to a gubernatorial veto. If the state Legislature fails to adopt its own plans within 45 days of the release of the Governor's maps, the Governor's maps are adopted.
Maryland's congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maryland law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</process><process_rendered><p>Maryland's state legislative districts are first drawn by the Governor and, typically, an advisory commission he appoints. The Governor must present this plan to the state Legislature on the first day of its regular session in 2022. The state Legislature also has the option of drawing its own districts, separate from the Governor's process. The state Legislature may adopt its own maps through a joint resolution, which requires no action by the Governor, so if the resolution passes, it is not subject to a gubernatorial veto. If the state Legislature fails to adopt its own plans within 45 days of the release of the Governor's maps, the Governor's maps are adopted.</p>
<p>Maryland's congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a three-fifths vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Maryland law requires that state legislative districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p></process_rendered><issues>In 2011, Maryland Democrats drew a congressional gerrymander to take the Sixth Congressional District from Republicans. This was the subject of a high-profile test case before the Supreme Court, Benisek v. Lamone.
In 2021, redistricting will be done under split-party control. There will be no elections between now and redistricting. Democrats have legislative supermajorities, opening the possibility that they could override of a veto by Republican Governor Larry Hogan. However, a switch of four Senate votes or fifteen votes in the House of Delegates would bring Democrats below supermajority threshold.</issues><issues_rendered><p>In 2011, Maryland Democrats drew a congressional gerrymander to take the Sixth Congressional District from Republicans. This was the subject of a high-profile test case before the Supreme Court, Benisek v. Lamone.</p>
<p>In 2021, redistricting will be done under split-party control. There will be no elections between now and redistricting. Democrats have legislative supermajorities, opening the possibility that they could override of a veto by Republican Governor Larry Hogan. However, a switch of four Senate votes or fifteen votes in the House of Delegates would bring Democrats below supermajority threshold.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>In 2011, Maryland Democrats drew a congressional gerrymander to take the Sixth Congressional District from Republicans. This was the subject of a high-profile test case before the Supreme Court, Benisek v. Lamone.
In 2021, redistricting will be done under split-party control. There will be no elections between now and redistricting. Democrats have legislative supermajorities, opening the possibility that they could override of a veto by Republican Governor Larry Hogan. However, a switch of four Senate votes or fifteen votes in the House of Delegates would bring Democrats below supermajority threshold.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/maryland/">Common Cause Maryland</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.lwvmd.org/">League of Women Voters of Maryland</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by governor and legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 07 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Massachusetts</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MA</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts and to identify communities of interest. </p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Massachusetts redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ma/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.massvote.org/">MassVote</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://lwvma.org/">League of Women Voters of Massachusetts</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.aclum.org/en">ACLU of Massachusetts</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://mggg.org/">Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<p>Redistricting in Massachusetts is under single-party control by Democrats because of the party\'s legislative supermajorities (permitting override of a veto from the Commonwealth\'s Republican Governor), and the congressional delegation is 9 Democrats and no Republicans. However, the Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group has used intensive computer simulations to find that Republicans are so evenly distributed around the state that drawing a Republican congressional district is impossible.</p>\n<p>In 2011, Massachusetts had an extensive <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/Redistricting_in_Massachusetts_after_the_2010_census#Public_input">public input</a> process for redistricting.</p>\n<p>In its 2019 legislative session, the Massachusetts Legislature is considering two similar proposals for an independent commission. <a href="https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/S13">S13</a>, a proposed constitutional amendment, creates a seven-member commission to draw congressional, state legislative, and councilor districts under certain criteria and with required public hearings. The maps would then be voted on by the Legislature without chance for amendment. <a href="https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/H679">H679</a>, a proposed bill, is essentially the same but is limited only to congressional lines.</p>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Massachusetts's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Massachusetts law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'MA', 'actions': 'Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts and to identify communities of interest. \r\n\r\n- Obtain Massachusetts redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ma/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[MassVote](https://www.massvote.org/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Massachusetts](https://lwvma.org/)\r\n\r\n[ACLU of Massachusetts](https://www.aclum.org/en)\r\n\r\n[Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group](https://mggg.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "Redistricting in Massachusetts is under single-party control by Democrats because of the party's legislative supermajorities (permitting override of a veto from the Commonwealth's Republican Governor), and the congressional delegation is 9 Democrats and no Republicans. However, the Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group has used intensive computer simulations to find that Republicans are so evenly distributed around the state that drawing a Republican congressional district is impossible.\r\n\r\nIn 2011, Massachusetts had an extensive [public input](https://ballotpedia.org/Redistricting_in_Massachusetts_after_the_2010_census#Public_input) process for redistricting.\r\n\r\nIn its 2019 legislative session, the Massachusetts Legislature is considering two similar proposals for an independent commission. [S13](https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/S13), a proposed constitutional amendment, creates a seven-member commission to draw congressional, state legislative, and councilor districts under certain criteria and with required public hearings. The maps would then be voted on by the Legislature without chance for amendment. [H679](https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/H679), a proposed bill, is essentially the same but is limited only to congressional lines.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 11, 1, 15, 13, 34, 792419, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/MA', 'legislative_control': 'Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Massachusetts', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Massachusetts's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Massachusetts law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 0}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MA</guid><actions>Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts and to identify communities of interest.
- Obtain Massachusetts redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ma/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Use public input to persuade the legislature to draw fair districts and to identify communities of interest. </p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Massachusetts redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/ma/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Massachusetts's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Massachusetts law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</process><process_rendered><p>Massachusetts's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Massachusetts law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be contiguous and preserve political subdivisions. There are no state law requirements for drawing congressional districts.</p></process_rendered><issues>Redistricting in Massachusetts is under single-party control by Democrats because of the party's legislative supermajorities (permitting override of a veto from the Commonwealth's Republican Governor), and the congressional delegation is 9 Democrats and no Republicans. However, the Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group has used intensive computer simulations to find that Republicans are so evenly distributed around the state that drawing a Republican congressional district is impossible.
In 2011, Massachusetts had an extensive [public input](https://ballotpedia.org/Redistricting_in_Massachusetts_after_the_2010_census#Public_input) process for redistricting.
In its 2019 legislative session, the Massachusetts Legislature is considering two similar proposals for an independent commission. [S13](https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/S13), a proposed constitutional amendment, creates a seven-member commission to draw congressional, state legislative, and councilor districts under certain criteria and with required public hearings. The maps would then be voted on by the Legislature without chance for amendment. [H679](https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/H679), a proposed bill, is essentially the same but is limited only to congressional lines.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Redistricting in Massachusetts is under single-party control by Democrats because of the party's legislative supermajorities (permitting override of a veto from the Commonwealth's Republican Governor), and the congressional delegation is 9 Democrats and no Republicans. However, the Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group has used intensive computer simulations to find that Republicans are so evenly distributed around the state that drawing a Republican congressional district is impossible.</p>
<p>In 2011, Massachusetts had an extensive <a href="https://ballotpedia.org/Redistricting_in_Massachusetts_after_the_2010_census#Public_input">public input</a> process for redistricting.</p>
<p>In its 2019 legislative session, the Massachusetts Legislature is considering two similar proposals for an independent commission. <a href="https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/S13">S13</a>, a proposed constitutional amendment, creates a seven-member commission to draw congressional, state legislative, and councilor districts under certain criteria and with required public hearings. The maps would then be voted on by the Legislature without chance for amendment. <a href="https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/H679">H679</a>, a proposed bill, is essentially the same but is limited only to congressional lines.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Redistricting in Massachusetts is under single-party control by Democrats because of the party's legislative supermajorities (permitting override of a veto from the Commonwealth's Republican Governor), and the congressional delegation is 9 Democrats and no Republicans. However, the Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group has used intensive computer simulations to find that Republicans are so evenly distributed around the state that drawing a Republican congressional district is impossible.
In 2011, Massachusetts had an extensive [public input](https://ballotpedia.org/Redistricting_in_Massachusetts_after_the_2010_census#Public_input) process for redistricting.
In its 2019 legislative session, the Massachusetts Legislature is considering two similar proposals for an independent commission. [S13](https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/S13), a proposed constitutional amendment, creates a seven-member commission to draw congressional, state legislative, and councilor districts under certain criteria and with required public hearings. The maps would then be voted on by the Legislature without chance for amendment. [H679](https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/H679), a proposed bill, is essentially the same but is limited only to congressional lines.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.massvote.org/">MassVote</a></p>
<p><a href="https://lwvma.org/">League of Women Voters of Massachusetts</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aclum.org/en">ACLU of Massachusetts</a></p>
<p><a href="https://mggg.org/">Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Republican</governor_party><last_updated>Nov 01 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Michigan</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MI</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Apply to be a citizen commissioner. The citizen application is <a href="https://redistrictingapplication.sos.state.mi.us/">open here</a>!</p>\n<p>Participate in the Commission\'s public comment process.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Michigan redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://votersnotpoliticians.com/">Voters Not Politicians</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/michigan/">Common Cause Michigan</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.aclumich.org/">ACLU of Michigan</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-1633_91141---,00.html">Citizens Redistricting Commission</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<ul>\n<li>\n<p>The success of this commission will depend on public input. Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Write to your local news organization in support of the independent commission. Make noise!</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>A federal lawsuit (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/daunt-v-benson">Daunt v. Benson</a>) has been filed challenging the constitutionality of the new independent commission.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The Supreme Court sent back a separate federal lawsuit (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/league-women-voters-michigan-v-benson">League of Women Voters v. Benson</a>) to the district court to be dismissed in light of the Court\'s ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear partisan gerrymandering claims.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Michigan is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p><b><u>Commission</u></b></p>\n<p>Beginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Michigan's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by a 13-member independent citizen redistricting commission.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>The membership must include four members of each major party and five who are not affiliated with either. The application process is open from January 1, 2020 until June 1 either through paper or online applications, including a certain number of randomly mailed paper applications. 60 applicants from each major party and 80 unaffiliated with either will be selected through a statistically-weighted random drawing to ensure diversity by July 1. Half of each pool must be populated from applicants who received a random mailing.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>After the 200 applicants are selected and by August 1, the four legislative leaders in the Michigan state legislature can strike up to five applicants each for a total of 20. From this final list of 180 applicants, 13 will be randomly selected by September 1, 2020. The commission must officially convene by October 15, 2020.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Initial plans must be drawn by September 17, 2021 to allow for a 45-day public comment period before the final deadline of November 1, 2021.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b><u>Criteria</u></b></p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Michigan law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate, or party is prohibited. Additionally, state law requires that state legislative districts be drawn to preserve the prior cores of preexisting districts.</p>\n<p><b><u>Public Input</u></b></p>\n<p>Under the new process, the commission must hold at least 10 public hearings before drafting maps and at least 5 after publication. Additionally, there must be a public comment period about the published maps for at least 45 days before they can be finalized. Throughout the process, the commission must accept written public comment and public map submissions.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'MI', 'actions': 'Apply to be a citizen commissioner. The citizen application is [open here](https://redistrictingapplication.sos.state.mi.us/)!\r\n\r\nParticipate in the Commission\'s public comment process.\r\n\r\n- Obtain Michigan redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. \r\n\r\n- Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Voters Not Politicians](https://votersnotpoliticians.com/)\r\n\r\n[Common Cause Michigan](https://www.commoncause.org/michigan/)\r\n\r\n[ACLU of Michigan](https://www.aclumich.org/)\r\n\r\n[Citizens Redistricting Commission](https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-1633_91141---,00.html)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'draws_state_lines': 'Independent Redistricting Commission', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': "- The success of this commission will depend on public input. Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.\r\n\r\n- Write to your local news organization in support of the independent commission. Make noise!\r\n\r\n- A federal lawsuit ([Daunt v. Benson](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/daunt-v-benson)) has been filed challenging the constitutionality of the new independent commission.\r\n\r\n- The Supreme Court sent back a separate federal lawsuit ([League of Women Voters v. Benson](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/league-women-voters-michigan-v-benson)) to the district court to be dismissed in light of the Court's ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear partisan gerrymandering claims.\r\n\r\n- Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Michigan is estimated to lose one congressional seat.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2020, 2, 17, 19, 33, 3, 874657, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/MI', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Michigan', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "<b><u>Commission</u></b>\r\n\r\nBeginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Michigan's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by a 13-member independent citizen redistricting commission.\r\n\r\n- The membership must include four members of each major party and five who are not affiliated with either. The application process is open from January 1, 2020 until June 1 either through paper or online applications, including a certain number of randomly mailed paper applications. 60 applicants from each major party and 80 unaffiliated with either will be selected through a statistically-weighted random drawing to ensure diversity by July 1. Half of each pool must be populated from applicants who received a random mailing.\r\n\r\n- After the 200 applicants are selected and by August 1, the four legislative leaders in the Michigan state legislature can strike up to five applicants each for a total of 20. From this final list of 180 applicants, 13 will be randomly selected by September 1, 2020. The commission must officially convene by October 15, 2020.\r\n\r\n- Initial plans must be drawn by September 17, 2021 to allow for a 45-day public comment period before the final deadline of November 1, 2021.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Criteria</u></b>\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Michigan law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate, or party is prohibited. Additionally, state law requires that state legislative districts be drawn to preserve the prior cores of preexisting districts.\r\n\r\n<b><u>Public Input</u></b>\r\n\r\nUnder the new process, the commission must hold at least 10 public hearings before drafting maps and at least 5 after publication. Additionally, there must be a public comment period about the published maps for at least 45 days before they can be finalized. Throughout the process, the commission must accept written public comment and public map submissions.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 1}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MI</guid><actions>Apply to be a citizen commissioner. The citizen application is [open here](https://redistrictingapplication.sos.state.mi.us/)!
Participate in the Commission's public comment process.
- Obtain Michigan redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.
- Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Apply to be a citizen commissioner. The citizen application is <a href="https://redistrictingapplication.sos.state.mi.us/">open here</a>!</p>
<p>Participate in the Commission's public comment process.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Michigan redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mi/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Submit maps to the Commission as a public comment.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process><b><u>Commission</u></b>
Beginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Michigan's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by a 13-member independent citizen redistricting commission.
- The membership must include four members of each major party and five who are not affiliated with either. The application process is open from January 1, 2020 until June 1 either through paper or online applications, including a certain number of randomly mailed paper applications. 60 applicants from each major party and 80 unaffiliated with either will be selected through a statistically-weighted random drawing to ensure diversity by July 1. Half of each pool must be populated from applicants who received a random mailing.
- After the 200 applicants are selected and by August 1, the four legislative leaders in the Michigan state legislature can strike up to five applicants each for a total of 20. From this final list of 180 applicants, 13 will be randomly selected by September 1, 2020. The commission must officially convene by October 15, 2020.
- Initial plans must be drawn by September 17, 2021 to allow for a 45-day public comment period before the final deadline of November 1, 2021.
<b><u>Criteria</u></b>
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Michigan law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate, or party is prohibited. Additionally, state law requires that state legislative districts be drawn to preserve the prior cores of preexisting districts.
<b><u>Public Input</u></b>
Under the new process, the commission must hold at least 10 public hearings before drafting maps and at least 5 after publication. Additionally, there must be a public comment period about the published maps for at least 45 days before they can be finalized. Throughout the process, the commission must accept written public comment and public map submissions.</process><process_rendered><p><b><u>Commission</u></b></p>
<p>Beginning in the 2020 redistricting cycle, Michigan's state legislative and congressional districts will be drawn by a 13-member independent citizen redistricting commission.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The membership must include four members of each major party and five who are not affiliated with either. The application process is open from January 1, 2020 until June 1 either through paper or online applications, including a certain number of randomly mailed paper applications. 60 applicants from each major party and 80 unaffiliated with either will be selected through a statistically-weighted random drawing to ensure diversity by July 1. Half of each pool must be populated from applicants who received a random mailing.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>After the 200 applicants are selected and by August 1, the four legislative leaders in the Michigan state legislature can strike up to five applicants each for a total of 20. From this final list of 180 applicants, 13 will be randomly selected by September 1, 2020. The commission must officially convene by October 15, 2020.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Initial plans must be drawn by September 17, 2021 to allow for a 45-day public comment period before the final deadline of November 1, 2021.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><b><u>Criteria</u></b></p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Michigan law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. Intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent, candidate, or party is prohibited. Additionally, state law requires that state legislative districts be drawn to preserve the prior cores of preexisting districts.</p>
<p><b><u>Public Input</u></b></p>
<p>Under the new process, the commission must hold at least 10 public hearings before drafting maps and at least 5 after publication. Additionally, there must be a public comment period about the published maps for at least 45 days before they can be finalized. Throughout the process, the commission must accept written public comment and public map submissions.</p></process_rendered><issues>- The success of this commission will depend on public input. Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.
- Write to your local news organization in support of the independent commission. Make noise!
- A federal lawsuit ([Daunt v. Benson](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/daunt-v-benson)) has been filed challenging the constitutionality of the new independent commission.
- The Supreme Court sent back a separate federal lawsuit ([League of Women Voters v. Benson](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/league-women-voters-michigan-v-benson)) to the district court to be dismissed in light of the Court's ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear partisan gerrymandering claims.
- Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Michigan is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</issues><issues_rendered><ul>
<li>
<p>The success of this commission will depend on public input. Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Write to your local news organization in support of the independent commission. Make noise!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>A federal lawsuit (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/daunt-v-benson">Daunt v. Benson</a>) has been filed challenging the constitutionality of the new independent commission.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The Supreme Court sent back a separate federal lawsuit (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/league-women-voters-michigan-v-benson">League of Women Voters v. Benson</a>) to the district court to be dismissed in light of the Court's ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear partisan gerrymandering claims.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Based upon a <a href="https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3">recent estimate</a> of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Michigan is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</p>
</li>
</ul></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>- The success of this commission will depend on public input. Stand up for your community of interest at public hearings.
- Write to your local news organization in support of the independent commission. Make noise!
- A federal lawsuit ([Daunt v. Benson](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/daunt-v-benson)) has been filed challenging the constitutionality of the new independent commission.
- The Supreme Court sent back a separate federal lawsuit ([League of Women Voters v. Benson](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/league-women-voters-michigan-v-benson)) to the district court to be dismissed in light of the Court's ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear partisan gerrymandering claims.
- Based upon a [recent estimate](https://www.electiondataservices.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NR_Appor19wTablesMaps.pdf#page=3) of congressional seat changes following the 2020 census, Michigan is estimated to lose one congressional seat.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://votersnotpoliticians.com/">Voters Not Politicians</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/michigan/">Common Cause Michigan</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aclumich.org/">ACLU of Michigan</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-1633_91141---,00.html">Citizens Redistricting Commission</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by independent redistricting commission</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Republican</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Feb 17 2020</last_updated></item><item><title>Minnesota</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MN</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Support the reform bill <a href="https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF1605&amp;version=0&amp;session=ls91&amp;session_year=2019&amp;session_number=0&amp;format=pdf">HF 1605</a>, which <a href="http://www.startribune.com/supreme-court-reminds-voters-who-s-in-charge-on-redistricting/512276682/">is backed by Common Cause Minnesota</a>. This bill passed the Minnesota House in 2019 and needs to pass the Senate in 2020.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Contact Common Cause Minnesota to get involved.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Use the extensive public comment process to stand up for your community of interest. </p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Obtain Minnesota redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mn/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave\'s Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/minnesota/">Common Cause Minnesota</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://cleanelectionsmn.org/">Clean Elections Minnesota</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': "<p>Minnesota's entire legislature is up for election in 2020. </p>\n<p>Minnesota redistricting has an extensive public comment process.</p>", '_pitfalls_rendered': '', '_process_rendered': "<p>Minnesota's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Minnesota law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. For state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent is prohibited.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'MN', 'actions': 'In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.\r\n\r\n- Support the reform bill [HF 1605](https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF1605&version=0&session=ls91&session_year=2019&session_number=0&format=pdf), which [is backed by Common Cause Minnesota](http://www.startribune.com/supreme-court-reminds-voters-who-s-in-charge-on-redistricting/512276682/). This bill passed the Minnesota House in 2019 and needs to pass the Senate in 2020.\r\n\r\n- Contact Common Cause Minnesota to get involved.\r\n\r\nUse the extensive public comment process to stand up for your community of interest. \r\n\r\n- Obtain Minnesota redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mn/">OpenPrecincts</a>.\r\n\r\n- Use software tools such as [Dave\'s Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Common Cause Minnesota](https://www.commoncause.org/minnesota/)\r\n\r\n[Clean Elections Minnesota](https://cleanelectionsmn.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Democratic', 'issues': "Minnesota's entire legislature is up for election in 2020. \r\n\r\nMinnesota redistricting has an extensive public comment process.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 10, 31, 18, 36, 51, 852643, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': 'http://gerrymander.princeton.edu/tests/#/congress/2018/MN', 'legislative_control': 'Senate: Republican; House: Democratic', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Minnesota', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': '', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Minnesota's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Minnesota law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. For state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent is prohibited.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 4}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MN</guid><actions>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.
- Support the reform bill [HF 1605](https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF1605&version=0&session=ls91&session_year=2019&session_number=0&format=pdf), which [is backed by Common Cause Minnesota](http://www.startribune.com/supreme-court-reminds-voters-who-s-in-charge-on-redistricting/512276682/). This bill passed the Minnesota House in 2019 and needs to pass the Senate in 2020.
- Contact Common Cause Minnesota to get involved.
Use the extensive public comment process to stand up for your community of interest.
- Obtain Minnesota redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mn/">OpenPrecincts</a>.
- Use software tools such as [Dave's Redistricting App](https://davesredistricting.org) and [Districtr](https://districtr.org/) to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</actions><actions_rendered><p>In 2020, support state legislative candidates who favor fair districting.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Support the reform bill <a href="https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF1605&amp;version=0&amp;session=ls91&amp;session_year=2019&amp;session_number=0&amp;format=pdf">HF 1605</a>, which <a href="http://www.startribune.com/supreme-court-reminds-voters-who-s-in-charge-on-redistricting/512276682/">is backed by Common Cause Minnesota</a>. This bill passed the Minnesota House in 2019 and needs to pass the Senate in 2020.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Contact Common Cause Minnesota to get involved.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Use the extensive public comment process to stand up for your community of interest. </p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Obtain Minnesota redistricting data from <a href="https://openprecincts.org/mn/">OpenPrecincts</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Use software tools such as <a href="https://davesredistricting.org">Dave's Redistricting App</a> and <a href="https://districtr.org/">Districtr</a> to draw district maps showing either (a) what a fair map would look like, or (b) where the community you believe should be better represented is located.</p>
</li>
</ul></actions_rendered><process>Minnesota's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Minnesota law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. For state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent is prohibited.</process><process_rendered><p>Minnesota's state legislative and congressional districts are drawn by the state Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Minnesota law requires that state legislative and congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest. For state legislative districts only, intentionally favoring or disfavoring an incumbent is prohibited.</p></process_rendered><issues>Minnesota's entire legislature is up for election in 2020.
Minnesota redistricting has an extensive public comment process.</issues><issues_rendered><p>Minnesota's entire legislature is up for election in 2020. </p>
<p>Minnesota redistricting has an extensive public comment process.</p></issues_rendered><reform></reform><reform_rendered></reform_rendered><history></history><history_rendered></history_rendered><contacts>Minnesota's entire legislature is up for election in 2020.
Minnesota redistricting has an extensive public comment process.</contacts><contacts_rendered><p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/minnesota/">Common Cause Minnesota</a></p>
<p><a href="https://cleanelectionsmn.org/">Clean Elections Minnesota</a></p></contacts_rendered><congressional_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</congressional_boundaries><state_boundaries>Drawn by legislature</state_boundaries><legislative_control>Senate: Republican; House: Democratic</legislative_control><governor_party>Democratic</governor_party><last_updated>Oct 31 2019</last_updated></item><item><title>Mississippi</title><link>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MS</link><description>{'_actions_rendered': '<p>Support a ballot initiative to establish an independent redistricting process.</p>', '_contacts_rendered': '<p><a href="https://www.commoncause.org/mississippi/">Common Cause Mississippi</a></p>\n<p><a href="http://www.lwv-ms.org/">League of Women Voters of Missippi</a></p>\n<p><a href="https://southernecho.org/">Southern Echo</a></p>', '_issues_rendered': '<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Because of the substantial black population, Mississippi is at risk of racial gerrymandering to reduce their representation.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>Mississippi has a ballot initiative process.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The governorship remained in Republican control in 2019, resulting in continued single-party control over redistricting. In addition, the state Senate is now a Republican supermajority.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case (<a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/thomas-v-bryant">Thomas v. Bryant</a>) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Mississippi\'s 22nd state Senate district as diluting minority voting strength. The lower court and a three-judge 5th Circuit both ruled in favor of the challenge, but the case is currently awaiting oral argument before the full panel of the 5th Circuit.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>', '_pitfalls_rendered': '<p>In recent redistricting cycles, Mississippi was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Mississippi was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Mississippians are treated fairly.</p>', '_process_rendered': "<p>Mississippi's state legislative and congressional lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. If the Legislature fails to adopt a state legislative map, the task falls to a partisan backup commission currently controlled by Republicans.</p>\n<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Mississippi law requires that state legislative l districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Mississippi law requires that congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</p>", 'abbreviation': 'MS', 'actions': 'Support a ballot initiative to establish an independent redistricting process.', 'actions_markup_type': 'markdown', 'comments': None, 'contacts': '[Common Cause Mississippi](https://www.commoncause.org/mississippi/)\r\n\r\n[League of Women Voters of Missippi](http://www.lwv-ms.org/)\r\n\r\n[Southern Echo](https://southernecho.org/)', 'contacts_markup_type': 'markdown', 'draws_congressional_lines': 'Legislature', 'draws_state_lines': 'Legislature', 'gov_control': 'Republican', 'issues': "- Because of the substantial black population, Mississippi is at risk of racial gerrymandering to reduce their representation.\r\n\r\n- Mississippi has a ballot initiative process.\r\n\r\n- The governorship remained in Republican control in 2019, resulting in continued single-party control over redistricting. In addition, the state Senate is now a Republican supermajority.\r\n\r\n- A Voting Rights Act Section 2 case ([Thomas v. Bryant](https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/thomas-v-bryant)) is being considered in federal court. The case challenges Mississippi's 22nd state Senate district as diluting minority voting strength. The lower court and a three-judge 5th Circuit both ruled in favor of the challenge, but the case is currently awaiting oral argument before the full panel of the 5th Circuit.", 'issues_markup_type': 'markdown', 'last_updated': datetime.datetime(2019, 11, 7, 20, 41, 6, 95527, tzinfo=<UTC>), 'latest_test_url': '', 'legislative_control': 'Republican', 'map_drawing_links': '', 'name': 'Mississippi', 'op_link': '', 'pitfalls': 'In recent redistricting cycles, Mississippi was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination against minority groups. In accordance with Section 5, Mississippi was required to receive preapproval from either the Department of Justice or a federal court for any change to its redistricting plans. This decade will be the first cycle without those protections. Observers should closely monitor every step of the redistricting process to ensure that all Mississippians are treated fairly.', 'pitfalls_markup_type': 'markdown', 'process': "Mississippi's state legislative and congressional lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. If the Legislature fails to adopt a state legislative map, the task falls to a partisan backup commission currently controlled by Republicans.\r\n\r\nIn addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Mississippi law requires that state legislative l districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Mississippi law requires that congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.", 'process_markup_type': 'markdown', 'status': 4}</description><guid>http://127.0.0.1:8000/reforms2019/MS</guid><actions>Support a ballot initiative to establish an independent redistricting process.</actions><actions_rendered><p>Support a ballot initiative to establish an independent redistricting process.</p></actions_rendered><process>Mississippi's state legislative and congressional lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. If the Legislature fails to adopt a state legislative map, the task falls to a partisan backup commission currently controlled by Republicans.
In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Mississippi law requires that state legislative l districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Mississippi law requires that congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</process><process_rendered><p>Mississippi's state legislative and congressional lines are drawn by the Legislature by ordinary statute, and are subject to the Governor's veto. The Legislature can override vetoes with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. If the Legislature fails to adopt a state legislative map, the task falls to a partisan backup commission currently controlled by Republicans.</p>
<p>In addition to the federal requirements of one person, one vote and the Voting Rights Act, Mississippi law requires that state legislative l districts be compact, contiguous, and preserve political subdivisions. Mississippi law requires that congressional districts be compact, contiguous, preserve political subdivisions, and preserve communities of interest.</p></process_rendered><issues>- Because of the substantial black population, Mississippi is at risk of racial gerrymandering to reduce their representation.