You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hope this message finds you well. I would like to discuss the possibility of releasing a new minor version (3.0.1) to address the signature change introduced in version 3.0.0d, specifically the function void mkd_e_code_format(void*, mkd_callback_t, mkd_free_t, void *); .
Currently, we are facing an issue where different distributions may have either version 3.0.0a or 3.0.0d. This inconsistency is causing problems because CMake's VERSION_LESS function does not handle alphanumeric parts correctly, treating them as the same version. As a workaround, we have resorted to using a condition like if(${PC_LIBMARKDOWN_VERSION} MATCHES "[abc]$"), but it would be much simpler for us if a minor version like 3.0.1 could be released.
I understand that you have many priorities, but if you could consider this request, it would greatly assist us.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I hope this message finds you well. I would like to discuss the possibility of releasing a new minor version (3.0.1) to address the signature change introduced in version 3.0.0d, specifically the function
void mkd_e_code_format(void*, mkd_callback_t, mkd_free_t, void *);
.Currently, we are facing an issue where different distributions may have either version 3.0.0a or 3.0.0d. This inconsistency is causing problems because CMake's
VERSION_LESS
function does not handle alphanumeric parts correctly, treating them as the same version. As a workaround, we have resorted to using a condition likeif(${PC_LIBMARKDOWN_VERSION} MATCHES "[abc]$")
, but it would be much simpler for us if a minor version like 3.0.1 could be released.I understand that you have many priorities, but if you could consider this request, it would greatly assist us.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: