Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

packaging needs some work #2

Open
7yl4r opened this issue May 26, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

packaging needs some work #2

7yl4r opened this issue May 26, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@7yl4r
Copy link
Member

7yl4r commented May 26, 2013

the planned package/module organization is not as intuitive as envisioned during planning. A new organization strategy in which I can actually remember lines of code is needed.

  • Option#1: more strictly standardized module names so that we know what to expect for each sub-package. I.e., the sub-structure of 'PA', 'Interaction', and other sub-modules match as closely as possible.
  • Option#2: less rigid structure to reduce sub-packaging. Visualization modules get more descriptive names, and less effort to break out sub-packages is made. Thus we get something more like PAbarChart.plot() in place of PA.timeSeries.barChart.plot()

Eh, I'm not sure what to do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant