Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation of code #64

Open
Raynes opened this issue Mar 5, 2012 · 4 comments
Open

Evaluation of code #64

Raynes opened this issue Mar 5, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@Raynes
Copy link
Owner

Raynes commented Mar 5, 2012

@codeblock is working on an API-based service called Breakpoint for code evaluation. We will want to tie this into RefHeap. Since it is API based, this wont be difficult and it wont give us any overhead because the evaluation will happen on @codeblock's servers.

This could be our killer feature over gist, given our future support for gist-like things such as revisions.

@gf3
Copy link
Contributor

gf3 commented Mar 5, 2012

UNTIL THEN cough cljbin cough

jk jk, This is a killer feature, looking forward to this.

@relrod
Copy link
Contributor

relrod commented Mar 6, 2012

Hi there. :D.

Yes, Breakpoint is almost-ish to the point where it will be able to actually eval code. It uses SELinux sandboxes to perform actual evaluations.

The entire project is open source. Repos are at https://github.com/breakpoint-eval - it's all in Scala, though we will have a few official libraries to interact with the API, in various languages.

Just figured I would introduce myself and be around to answer any questions or whatnot. I also just started #breakpoint-eval on freenode. Feel free to hang out.

-re

@gf3
Copy link
Contributor

gf3 commented Mar 7, 2012

@codeblock Breakpoint looks awesome!

@vemv
Copy link

vemv commented Jul 27, 2012

Breakpoint's web design is the best I've seen in a long while!

Looking forward to this feature - it'd be killer indeed. A sexpr-aware sending function between the pasted code and the repl would be handy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants