You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a summary of issue #418 as it is more appropriate here.
For a simple partitioned mesh: rectangular domain with 4 mesh parts, the vertex classification on some mesh parts are incorrect. Below is a mesh part with wrong vertex classification.
All non-boundary vertices in this mesh part are inside the domain, so they should be classified on the model face. This corresponds to a class_dim of 2.
But in the figure, many of the vertices have class_id=0.
It is confirmed that:
When using full fullbuffer and safe methods, the classification looks fine.
When using full bfsbuffer and safe methods, the classification looks fine.
Only when using bfs bfsbuffer and safe methods, the classification does not look correct for some PICparts (the classification for top PICpart is fine, but is incorrect for bottom PICpart).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a summary of issue #418 as it is more appropriate here.
For a simple partitioned mesh: rectangular domain with 4 mesh parts, the vertex classification on some mesh parts are incorrect. Below is a mesh part with wrong vertex classification.
class_dim
of2
.class_id=0
.It is confirmed that:
full full
buffer
andsafe
methods, the classification looks fine.full bfs
buffer
andsafe
methods, the classification looks fine.bfs bfs
buffer
andsafe
methods, the classification does not look correct for some PICparts (the classification for topPICpart
is fine, but is incorrect for bottomPICpart
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: