Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sms invitations #110

Open
jahshaka opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

sms invitations #110

jahshaka opened this issue Sep 29, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Android This issue applies to Android iOS This issue applies to iOS Server Side This issue applies to the Server Side

Comments

@jahshaka
Copy link

move SMS invitations to server side so there are no cost to the user sending them out - invitations are critical here

we will need to batch them when sending more than 3 out to avoid being banned by carriers

@jovi959 jovi959 added Android This issue applies to Android iOS This issue applies to iOS Server Side This issue applies to the Server Side labels Sep 29, 2018
@jayrulez jayrulez self-assigned this Oct 3, 2018
@rox117 rox117 self-assigned this Oct 12, 2018
@rox117
Copy link

rox117 commented Oct 23, 2018

we will need to batch them when sending more than 3 out to avoid being banned by carriers

could you clarify what you mean by "we will need to batch them when sending more than 3 out to avoid being banned by carriers"

@jahshaka
Copy link
Author

meaning this needs to be careful we dont get marked as spammers as the sending number will be black listed. if a user is sendinging more than 3 SMS invites out then we need batch them and send them - say - 3 at a time and rotate the sending numbers so they dont get blocked

ideally we need a pool of numbers for SMS invitations that are seperate from the core numbers we use to sending pin codes et cout

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Android This issue applies to Android iOS This issue applies to iOS Server Side This issue applies to the Server Side
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants