Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Idea] Move check to monitoring-checks repo #36

Open
rndmh3ro opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[Idea] Move check to monitoring-checks repo #36

rndmh3ro opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@rndmh3ro
Copy link

We recently created a new repository to hold all our monitoring-checks.

Do you want to put your check_springboot_actuator check into there, too?

It would basically mean moving the whole contents to a new folder here: https://github.com/telekom-mms/monitoring-checks/tree/main/check-plugins

@jandd
Copy link
Member

jandd commented Oct 9, 2023

@rndmh3ro we currently have the check registered in exchange.icinga.com. As far as I know they support only a single item per repository. Merging the check with the other checks would break this.

@rndmh3ro
Copy link
Author

rndmh3ro commented Oct 9, 2023

I took a look at other checks at the exchange.
The Linuxfabrik-Monitoring Plugins can be found here: https://exchange.icinga.com/Linuxfabrik/Linuxfabrik%20Monitoring%20Plugins%20Collection

There are dozens of checks in there. So in theory it should be possible to register the monitoring-checks repo to the exchange. Do you use any other special features I'm not aware of that would make this impossible?

@jandd
Copy link
Member

jandd commented Oct 10, 2023

I looked into their GitHub repository, but could not find an icingaexchange.yml. That makes me wonder how they created/update that Icinga Exchange entry. Maybe manually or somehow combined with their release process. Needs investigation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants