-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Write a migration guide for 1.0 #58
Comments
Some of the build failures that come up after moving to However if the pipe operator wasn't used, for example |
Many methods on the node interface - We probably need to list these explicitly. In version 2, we will add named arguments... although if they will cause headaches for developers, and they need to edit these lines anyway, perhaps we add them in 1.0 (#49) |
The "t first" swap means in 3 places an extra In these 3 cases, previously the use of "t last" was used as a shortcut to resolve them (via The three APIs are:
In all 3 cases the unit argument is not emitted, only required by the compiler, using the |
@TheSpyder Hi, what are the plans for releasing |
Sorry, I haven't been a very good steward of this codebase. A year ago I moved across country and I've let other things get in the way since then - we stopped using ReScript at work, so it's now just me on my personal time. My plan for 1.0 was to get it out and then do a big API update; there are some experimental branches and very old PRs along these lines. I will welcome any contributions. |
Moving from
bs-webapi
torescript-webapi
1.0 won't be a drop-in replacement. We need a migration guide, and I think we need to highlight it at the top of our readme file.I'm going to make notes in comments to this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: