Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deal with transitivity #23

Open
kohlhase opened this issue Sep 13, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

deal with transitivity #23

kohlhase opened this issue Sep 13, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@kohlhase
Copy link
Member

This issue is to start a discussion.

We should have a setting that computes the transitive skeleton of a graph and only show that.

I thought that the JSON sources should only generate transitive skeletons, but I think we should reconsider.

I now think that there should functionality in the TGView client that (like showing/hiding meta edges) show/hide transitively redundant edges: sometimes we want to see the full set of edges and sometimes we do not (to avoid clutter).

For this we might have to annotate edges in the JSON with properties (here whether an edge belongs to a transitive relation).

@kohlhase
Copy link
Member Author

BTW, the same holds for other properties of relations. E.g. reflexivity symmetry, ...

All in all this would make TGView more "semantic".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants