Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Randomness of RSSI value for different configurations #244

Open
ChristophPargfrieder opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Randomness of RSSI value for different configurations #244

ChristophPargfrieder opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ChristophPargfrieder
Copy link

Hey,

I struggle with the following issue: I implement some advanced HO decision algorithm. I run two different configurations (using some 5G network) to show the difference to the default HO decision: The first runs the simulation with the default behaviour. The second configuration is basically the same, but enables the HO decision algorithm, which results in slightly different HO behaviour. Although this results in some differences in terms of the HO in both simulations, in most of the time, the UEs are attached to the same gNBs (just a few ping-pong effects are avoided). Before the first HO attempt, both simulations show the same RSSI value of the serving gNB for the UE. However, in case of the first different HO decision, the RSSI value becomes different, even in some later point in time when the UE is attached to the same gNB in both simulation runs. Thus, the RSSI becomes than quite different, although the UE is at the same position and attached to the same gNB.

I assume this has something to do with the rng configuration. I would like to achieve that the RSSI is the same when running both configurations - it should be only different for the point in time when the UE is attached to different gNBs. Is there any way to achieve this?

@ChristophPargfrieder ChristophPargfrieder changed the title Randomness in RSSI for different configurations Randomness of RSSI value for different configurations Dec 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant