Suggestion about displaying the names of installed applications

[RaulKong898]

Feature Description

The functionality I have in mind is about how apps are named in Vanilla OS. Currently, applications installed via VSO or sideload DEB display “on VSO-Pico” in their name. The proposal is that these applications no longer display this suffix.

Instead, only apps from other systems that are installed with APX should keep their names, so you know where they were installed from. For example, instead of “Steam on VSO-Pico”, users would prefer only “Steam” for official applications installed from VSO.

This change could help clarify installation sources and improve the user experience.

Rationale

This functionality is required to improve the clarity and usability of Vanilla OS. Currently, users may be confused about the source of application installation, as all applications installed via VSO or sideload DEB include the suffix "on VSO-Pico" in their names.

Removing this suffix for officially installed applications from VSO could reduce confusion and make it easier for users to identify the source of the applications. Additionally, keeping the original name for apps installed from other systems with APX would allow users to know exactly where these apps were installed from.

Therefore, this functionality solves the problem of users getting confused about where to install applications and improves the overall user experience with Vanilla OS.

Additional Information

I would like to add that this proposal to improve Vanilla OS comes as a result of direct feedback from users. It is important to remember that users are the ones who interact the most with the operating system, and therefore understanding their needs and preferences is essential to the continuous development and improvement of the product.

I would also like to point out that this change would not only improve the user experience, but could also simplify the troubleshooting and support process for the technical support team. By removing the "on VSO-Pico" suffix, it would be easier to identify and resolve application issues.

In conclusion, I believe that this functionality would bring significant benefits to both users and the development and technical support team. Thanks for considering this proposal!

[taukakao]

I mean it might look better without the Suffix but I don't see how it would improve clarity here.

The suffix specifies that the application was installed inside a container. Flatpaks, which are the preffered installation method, do not have this suffix.

(To be clear: I'm not strictly against removing it, but it would be more of a visual improvement than a functional one)