Total: 41
src/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:340 2024-06-04, rename, because it is missleading, the only thing what will be calculated is the checksum word
src/xmrsigner/gui/screens/tools_screens.py
:383 2024-06-17, added with rebase from main to 0.7.0 of seedsigner, lot of work to dosrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:59 2024-06-17, activate when it workssrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:61 2024-06-17, activate when it workssrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:443 2024-06-17, holy clusterfuck, added with rebase from main to 0.7.0 of seedsigner, lot of work to do
src/xmrsigner/views/seed_views.py
:333 2024-06-26, solve multi network issuesrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:369 2024-06-26, solve multi network issuesrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:458 2024-06-26, solve multi network issuesrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:464 2024-06-26, solve multi network issuesrc/xmrsigner/views/view.py
:245 2024-06-26, solve multi network issuesrc/xmrsigner/views/view.py
:249 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
src/xmrsigner/models/settings.py
:16 2024-06-30 don't know what will uname return on win32, check
src/xmrsigner/views/seed_views.py
:836 expire 2024-07-15, from there come this numbers, is this not some data comming from QR code constraints? Would it no be wise to get the number from there instead of this??? Test if smaller are viable
src/xmrsigner/views/scan_views.py
:129 2024-07-23, implementsrc/xmrsigner/views/scan_views.py
:133 2024-07-23, implement
src/xmrsigner/helpers/monero.py
:234 2024-07-26, this should be in monero-python
src/xmrsigner/views/monero_views.py
:239 2024-07-27, decide what to do aboutsrc/xmrsigner/views/monero_views.py
:269 2024-07-27, decide to check or removesrc/xmrsigner/views/monero_views.py
:391 2024-07-27, code missing here!src/xmrsigner/views/wallet_views.py
:151 2024-07-27, thought: redirect to address viewer as soon it exists
src/xmrsigner/gui/components.py
:790 2024-07-28, render only with Monero Logosrc/xmrsigner/gui/components.py
:867 2024-07-28, render only with Monero Logo
src/xmrsigner/gui/components.py
:780 2024-08-02, change to Monero icon
src/xmrsigner/views/wallet_views.py
:225 2024-08-04, implement
src/xmrsigner/views/scan_views.py
:43 2024-08-08, not sure if this is a good idea, refactor one day
src/xmrsigner/views/seed_views.py
:442 2024-08-09, implementsrc/xmrsigner/views/wallet_views.py
:209 2024-08-09 implement
src/test/xmrsigner/helpers/polyseed_mnemonic_generation.py
:13 not working yet, some issue in polyseed-pythonsrc/xmrsigner/gui/components.py
:217 don't need BTC, need XMR glyph is still Bitcoinsrc/xmrsigner/gui/components.py
:218 don't need BTC, need XMR glyph is still Bitcoinsrc/xmrsigner/hardware/buttons.py
:149 #SEEDSIGNER Implementrelease_lock
functionality as a global somewhere. Mixes up designsrc/xmrsigner/helpers/monero_time.py
:1 move this to monero-python, network related part should maybe move to .network?src/xmrsigner/helpers/ur2/cbor_lite.py
:246 Check that this is the right way -- do we need to use struct.unpack()?src/xmrsigner/helpers/ur2/fountain_decoder.py
:37 Not efficientsrc/xmrsigner/helpers/ur2/fountain_decoder.py
:55 Handle None?src/xmrsigner/helpers/ur2/fountain_decoder.py
:200 Does this need to make a copy of p?src/xmrsigner/helpers/ur2/fountain_encoder.py
:35 Do something better with this checksrc/xmrsigner/models/base_decoder.py
:29 #SEEDSIGNER standardize this approach across all decoders (example: SignMessageQrDecoder)src/xmrsigner/views/screensaver.py
:12 This early code is now outdated vis-a-vis Screen vs View distinctionssrc/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:493 Refactor to a cleanerBackStack.get_previous_View_cls()
src/xmrsigner/views/tools_views.py
:547 Custom derivation path
- Line 13: None not working yet, some issue in polyseed-python
- Line 217: None don't need BTC, need XMR glyph is still Bitcoin
- Line 218: None don't need BTC, need XMR glyph is still Bitcoin
- Line 780: 2024-08-02 2024-08-02, change to Monero icon
- Line 790: 2024-07-28 2024-07-28, render only with Monero Logo
- Line 867: 2024-07-28 2024-07-28, render only with Monero Logo
- Line 383: 2024-06-17 2024-06-17, added with rebase from main to 0.7.0 of seedsigner, lot of work to do
- Line 149: None #SEEDSIGNER
Implement
release_lock
functionality as a global somewhere. Mixes up design
- Line 234: 2024-07-26 2024-07-26, this should be in monero-python
- Line 1: None move this to monero-python, network related part should maybe move to .network?
- Line 246: None Check that this is the right way -- do we need to use struct.unpack()?
- Line 37: None Not efficient
- Line 55: None Handle None?
- Line 200: None Does this need to make a copy of p?
- Line 35: None Do something better with this check
- Line 29: None #SEEDSIGNER standardize this approach across all decoders (example: SignMessageQrDecoder)
- Line 16: 2024-06-30 2024-06-30 don't know what will uname return on win32, check
- Line 239: 2024-07-27 2024-07-27, decide what to do about
- Line 269: 2024-07-27 2024-07-27, decide to check or remove
- Line 391: 2024-07-27 2024-07-27, code missing here!
- Line 43: 2024-08-08 2024-08-08, not sure if this is a good idea, refactor one day
- Line 129: 2024-07-23 2024-07-23, implement
- Line 133: 2024-07-23 2024-07-23, implement
- Line 12: None This early code is now outdated vis-a-vis Screen vs View distinctions
- Line 333: 2024-06-26 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
- Line 442: 2024-08-09 2024-08-09, implement
- Line 836: 2024-07-15 expire 2024-07-15, from there come this numbers, is this not some data comming from QR code constraints? Would it no be wise to get the number from there instead of this??? Test if smaller are viable
- Line 59: 2024-06-17 2024-06-17, activate when it works
- Line 61: 2024-06-17 2024-06-17, activate when it works
- Line 340: 2024-06-04 2024-06-04, rename, because it is missleading, the only thing what will be calculated is the checksum word
- Line 369: 2024-06-26 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
- Line 443: 2024-06-17 2024-06-17, holy clusterfuck, added with rebase from main to 0.7.0 of seedsigner, lot of work to do
- Line 458: 2024-06-26 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
- Line 464: 2024-06-26 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
- Line 493: None
Refactor to a cleaner
BackStack.get_previous_View_cls()
- Line 547: None Custom derivation path
- Line 245: 2024-06-26 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
- Line 249: 2024-06-26 2024-06-26, solve multi network issue
- Line 151: 2024-07-27 2024-07-27, thought: redirect to address viewer as soon it exists
- Line 209: 2024-08-09 2024-08-09 implement
- Line 225: 2024-08-04 2024-08-04, implement
src/xmrsigner/hardware/buttons.py
:149 Implementrelease_lock
functionality as a global somewhere. Mixes up designsrc/xmrsigner/models/base_decoder.py
:29 standardize this approach across all decoders (example: SignMessageQrDecoder)