You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am working with Z3 and encountered an issue where an expression involving bitwise operations is not being simplified as expected. Here's the Python code snippet:
In the output, the right-shift operation (V & 65535) >> 15 is not further simplified. I originally expected Z3 to optimize this expression, particularly by eliminating the redundant (V & 65535).
My questions are:
Why does Z3 retain the current form of the expression without simplifying the redundancy in (V & 65535)?
Are there specific settings, tactics or options that can force Z3 to further optimize this?
If this is a known limitation or intentional behavior in Z3, what are the recommended approaches or alternatives for optimizing such expressions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am working with Z3 and encountered an issue where an expression involving bitwise operations is not being simplified as expected. Here's the Python code snippet:
In the output, the right-shift operation (V & 65535) >> 15 is not further simplified. I originally expected Z3 to optimize this expression, particularly by eliminating the redundant (V & 65535).
My questions are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: