Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Break up systematic review standard #60

Open
drpaulralph opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Break up systematic review standard #60

drpaulralph opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Epic Story

Comments

@drpaulralph
Copy link
Collaborator

The systematic review standard should be divided into at least three standards for meta-analysis, case survey, critical review, meta-synthesis. Somewhere we need to explain that ad hoc reviews, rapid reviews and tertiary reviews are not covered. Decide whether to accept scoping reviews / systematic mapping studies, or argue that they aren't mature enough for full papers.

@drpaulralph drpaulralph added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Epic Story labels Jan 25, 2022
@drpaulralph drpaulralph self-assigned this Jan 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Epic Story
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant