Transparency around funding

[tobie]

In his review @triblondon made the following comment:

Be transparent about funding: Again to quote the blog: "This is real work, and we want to pay for it if it isn’t covered by your day job". Who is 'we' and where does that money come from? I suggest that all individuals who work on AMP for more than 50% of their working hours, should be disclosed and funding sources indicated.

Here's @cramforce's initial answer:

Quick response on the funding side: We don't have this mapped out and it will depend on the individual requirements. What we have been discussing is for Google to fund an the AMP OpenCollective project out of which the AC would fund its members. With a transition to foundation this would then be taken over by it naturally.

[mrjoro]

Assuming AMP successfully completes the OpenJS Foundation incubation program, we should be in a better state here.

I couldn't find specific OpenJS Foundation documentation on funding transparency other than the list of members and the documented dues for each level.

There is the open issue on the OpenJS Foundation side regarding directed funding, but I'm assuming that will be transparent as well?