refactor: externalise 'report' features to module

[germa89]

Description

As the title.

Issue linked

Related to #3491

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.12195% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.37%. Comparing base (279cbba) to head (c44fa35).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3511   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.36%   82.37%           
=======================================
  Files          57       58    +1     
  Lines       10004    10006    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         8240     8242    +2     
  Misses       1764     1764           

[germa89]

@pyansys-ci-bot LGTM.

[pyansys-ci-bot]

✅ Approving this PR because germa89 said so in here 😬