You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A feature request to specify the minimum contig length for which prodigal-gv should try and predict a non-standard genetic code. Suggest using 10kb as the default. I believe this was your suggestion from our discussion, but wanted to create an issue to track it.
I looked at the rate in which prodigal-gv predicts alternatives codes in IMG/VR data. In large contigs > 20kb, prodigal-gv predicts alternative codes for ~1.5% of viral contigs. This increases to 2.5% <10kb, 3.3% <5kb, and 5.4% <2.5kb. My hunch is that most of the alternative code predictions for short contigs are FPs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A feature request to specify the minimum contig length for which prodigal-gv should try and predict a non-standard genetic code. Suggest using 10kb as the default. I believe this was your suggestion from our discussion, but wanted to create an issue to track it.
I looked at the rate in which prodigal-gv predicts alternatives codes in IMG/VR data. In large contigs > 20kb, prodigal-gv predicts alternative codes for ~1.5% of viral contigs. This increases to 2.5% <10kb, 3.3% <5kb, and 5.4% <2.5kb. My hunch is that most of the alternative code predictions for short contigs are FPs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: