You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When fabric is an L3LS, with L3 P2P links between leaves and spines, we configure the following the L3 leaves with LACP fallback on the MLAG peer link:
interface Port-Channel3
description MLAG_DC1-CL2_Port-Channel3
no shutdown
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk group MLAG
switchport
port-channel lacp fallback individual
port-channel lacp fallback timeout 30
no sflow enable
interface Ethernet3
description MLAG_DC1-CL2_Ethernet3
no shutdown
speed 100g
switchport access vlan 4092
switchport mode access
switchport
channel-group 3 mode active
This is valid for L2 ZTP inband, where in some scenarios we may need to ZTP over the MLAG peer link. However in L3 ZTP inband, this should not be necessary. Also inband mgmt vlan 4092 does not exist in the leaves for this type of fabric.
We probably need a check in AVD to not configure the MLAG peer link to allow for in-band ZTP of an MLAG neighbor if a device's connection to its uplink neighbor is a p2p link.
Which component(s) of AVD impacted
eos_designs
How do you run AVD ?
Ansible CLI (with virtual-env or native python)
Steps to reproduce
Enable L3 ZTP inband in the leaves as follows with an L3LS fabric:
l3leaf:
defaults:
# virtual router mac for VNIs assigned to Leaf switches
virtual_router_mac_address: 00:1c:73:00:dc:01
platform: vEOS
bgp_as: "65000.1-65000.10"
uplink_ipv4_pool: 192.168.1.0/24
loopback_ipv4_pool: 192.168.100.0/24
vtep_loopback_ipv4_pool: 192.168.200.0/24
uplink_interfaces: [Ethernet1, Ethernet2]
uplink_switches: [DC1-SP1, DC1-SP2]
uplink_interface_speed: forced 100g
mlag: true
mlag_interfaces: [Ethernet3]
mlag_interfaces_speed: 100g
mlag_peer_ipv4_pool: 172.16.0.0/24
mlag_peer_l3_ipv4_pool: 172.16.1.0/24
mlag_dual_primary_detection: true
spanning_tree_priority: 4096
spanning_tree_mode: mstp
inband_mgmt_interface: "Loopback0"
inband_ztp: true
structured_config:
router_bgp:
as_notation: "asdot"
bgp_defaults:
- timers bgp 5 15
- neighbor default send-community
Relevant log output
Contributing Guide
I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
An l3leaf could be deployed before the spine, so I still think it would make sense to support ZTP over the peer-link. Or maybe there is no spine in a small network.
If we need to support ZTP over the peer-link for L3 switches, we would need to create the inband mgmt vlan (4092 in the example) with a relay to the DHCP server, correct? It may complicate the solution. Currently this would not work anyway, since DHCP requests would not hit the Spines (or any other device acting as the DHCP server) over the peer-link.
I am not saying we should use the 4092 vlan solution. We could make the fallback interface config use a static IP (maybe same as port-channel to keep it simple) and run a dhcp server locally on the leaf? We can also make this an option if we don't feel like it makes sense in most cases.
Issue Summary
As discussed with @jrecchia1029, when we enable L3 ZTP inband as follows:
When fabric is an L3LS, with L3 P2P links between leaves and spines, we configure the following the L3 leaves with LACP fallback on the MLAG peer link:
This is valid for L2 ZTP inband, where in some scenarios we may need to ZTP over the MLAG peer link. However in L3 ZTP inband, this should not be necessary. Also inband mgmt vlan 4092 does not exist in the leaves for this type of fabric.
We probably need a check in AVD to not configure the MLAG peer link to allow for in-band ZTP of an MLAG neighbor if a device's connection to its uplink neighbor is a p2p link.
Which component(s) of AVD impacted
eos_designs
How do you run AVD ?
Ansible CLI (with virtual-env or native python)
Steps to reproduce
Relevant log output
Contributing Guide
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: