Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spec_driver_fits fails with exit code 11 randomly #2

Open
teuben opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

spec_driver_fits fails with exit code 11 randomly #2

teuben opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
Basically Done all but marked as done

Comments

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor

teuben commented Dec 10, 2020

spec_driver_fits is called by grid_data.py, but just changing the x_extent/y_extent can cause it to crash.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Dec 21, 2020

it's random: re-executing the program it will work again after a few tries. I don't know of a fool proof way to make it crash.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Dec 24, 2020

there was an indexing out of the C.caxis[X_AXIS][ix+ii] and C.caxis[Y_AXIS][iy+jj], which was fixed.
the problem should be solved now.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Dec 25, 2020

alas, trying out some cases with different cell= and otf_select= cause more of these. electricfence didn't jhelp, it first ran into libnetcdf access with 0 memory allocation problems. frustrating.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Dec 29, 2020

non=square maps tend to give predictable segfaults

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Dec 29, 2020

indeed, axis naming order. no wonder, since X=1 and Y=0 and Z=2..
Sadly the mdarray access method is now 8x slower, possibly because most access is in Z.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Jan 14, 2021

perhaps with #5 this is solved. watch out if rmax is large for small test/beam grids with the -a flag. there may still be a crash awaiting resolution.

@teuben teuben added the Basically Done all but marked as done label Jan 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Basically Done all but marked as done
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant