Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Output screen to a local text file. Please upvote if you like. #17

Open
ShannonVanWagner opened this issue Jul 15, 2013 · 11 comments

Comments

@ShannonVanWagner
Copy link

Thanks for this great beagle-term app, and also for making it open source!

I would like to make a feature request to have the application output to a local plain-text file on the chromebook.

This would help because then I could go back and search through parts of the terminal output for troubleshooting.

For those others who use this great application, please indicate in the comments if you'd like to have the aforementioned feature as well.

Again, Thank You very much for your efforts! It's much appreciated!

  • Shannon VanWagner
    humans-enabled
@sunglim
Copy link
Member

sunglim commented Jul 22, 2013

👍

Yes this feature is essential. actullay I was thinking that BeagleTerm saves log file and shares it thru goole drive..
The lack of spare time is the problem :(

@sunglim
Copy link
Member

sunglim commented Feb 13, 2014

FileSync could be difficult.
workaround : save to local PC storage. (See Spark https://github.com/dart-lang/spark, how to save git data to local)

@jumanjiman
Copy link

👍

@sunglim sunglim self-assigned this Feb 13, 2014
@Frazior
Copy link

Frazior commented Nov 9, 2014

Would love the ability to dump to a text file. I am a network engineer and am constantly needing to save configs.

@sunglim
Copy link
Member

sunglim commented Nov 9, 2014

Recently I was thinking this feature.

two options.

  1. save current buffer(which you can see from screen)
  2. save from curent. (all text from now will be saved)

@Frazior
Copy link

Frazior commented Nov 10, 2014

I can see benefits and uses for both options but if I had to pick one the
save from current would be preferable to me.

Thanks for your response

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Sungguk Lim [email protected]
wrote:

Recently I was thinking this feature.

two option.

  1. save current buffer(which you can see from screen)
  2. save from curent. (all text from now will be saved)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment)
.

@jumanjiman
Copy link

the drawback to "save-from-current" is that some programs mess with the tty to clobber the buffer.
but that's not a beagleterm problem imho.

@ahluntang
Copy link

If you are referring to programs trying to clear the buffer prematurely, then I think it is a beagleterm problem, I rather have beagleterm react to such signals like GNU screen does and ignore clear commands as I'm missing important information just because of that.

@sunglim
Copy link
Member

sunglim commented Nov 12, 2014

My design goal is "Putty" from Windows. and I'm working on implementing menu, saving buffers to file.
If you're interested in, take a look https://github.com/sunglim/BeagleTermDart

sorry about late developmenent.
I have a job, it's 8:20 PM. and I'm still at the office sadly.(We usualy spend lot of time from office, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_time)

If anybody who can join. please come and write code! https://github.com/sunglim/BeagleTermDart

@sunglim
Copy link
Member

sunglim commented Nov 12, 2014

Thanks much for the feedback. I really appreciate it! @ahluntang @jumanjiman @Frazior

@codewithtyler
Copy link

codewithtyler commented Sep 14, 2016

I've never considered Putty to be a design goal. I was thinking something more like TeraTerm. I always thought it was simpler for newcomers than Putty.

I'll take a look at BeagleTermDart when I get a chance to see how your UI's looked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants