Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ameriflux calls - notes #64

Open
bpbond opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Ameriflux calls - notes #64

bpbond opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@bpbond
Copy link
Owner

bpbond commented Jul 4, 2019

Call with Deb, Margaret, Danielle 2019-07-03:

  • Check with Avni about high latitude synthesis (Sue N?)
  • Per Deb, take a careful look at e.g. CC-BY instead of current MIT, which is more of a software license and less familiar to e.g. journals.
  • May want to reconsider acknowledgment policy—requiring citation of individual datasets and/or COSORE paper
  • Follow up with Danielle (?) about an Ameriflux blog entry about COSORE
  • In August, schedule call to discuss next steps, in particular no COSORE design decisions prevent a future COSORE->BADM transfer. Probably Ben and Danielle should review technical details ahead of this
@bpbond
Copy link
Owner Author

bpbond commented Sep 11, 2019

Call with Danielle 2019-09-11

  • Design decisions - esp. vis-a-vis BADM
  • Trivial - units
  • Categorization questions
  • Timestamps and aggregation
  • Metadata and data

What we're thinking about:

  • Anything that BADM requires that's not in COSORE?
  • Anything in COSORE that BADM should add?

Goal: Google doc with mapping

BADM - overall design philosophy and organization

  • crosses both BADM and continuous data products
  • consistent resolution at a common interval -> continuous fluxnet data product
  • sporadic data -> BADM
  • Metadata: groups of metadata get entered together
  • Location information about chamber? Some have asked about this
  • What about identifying Ameriflux sites?
  • Everything is in local standard time - UTC offset
  • Start and end of observations - what about observation length as metadata?

Ben TODO

  • Make a time resolution report
  • Point her to the RPubs document & download link
  • Set up a google sheet
  • Think about further QA/QC
  • Think about observation length field

@bpbond bpbond changed the title Ameriflux call notes 2019-07-03 Ameriflux calls - notes Oct 17, 2019
@bpbond
Copy link
Owner Author

bpbond commented Oct 17, 2019

Meeting with Danielle - 2019-10-17 in Berkeley

Broad agreement on approach to heavy/light software stack, nimbleness, standards.

Things to think about technically:

@bpbond
Copy link
Owner Author

bpbond commented Dec 10, 2019

Meeting with Danielle and Stephanie at AGU 2019-12-09

  • Summarized issues, institutions, goals for SCP
  • Things like webinars could be supported by ESS-DIVE team
  • See two bold issues above--there may be others but these currently known problems
  • Talked about 2020: data ingestion, infrastructure development, and standards/outreach
  • First step for outreach Outreach under ESS-DIVE work #72 might be to survey existing COSORE contributors - treat as a pilot survey

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant