Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Admin: Cal-ITP Benefits staff user cannot add PemData models #2666

Open
4 tasks
angela-tran opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2673
Open
4 tasks

Admin: Cal-ITP Benefits staff user cannot add PemData models #2666

angela-tran opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2673
Assignees

Comments

@angela-tran
Copy link
Member

angela-tran commented Feb 4, 2025

This is for breaking up the part of #2638 that ensures staff members cannot add PemData models. See 0995c0e.

Based on the spreadsheet, we do not want staff members to see anything from PemDatas or be able to add them.

Let's make it explicit by implementing has_view_permission and has_add_permission.

Acceptance Criteria

superuser

  • Confirm all fields are visible and editable as before
  • Confirm instances of PemData can be added as before

Cal-ITP group member

  • Confirm correct fields are visible/nonvisible, and editable/readonly
  • Confirm new instances of the PemData model cannot be added
@angela-tran
Copy link
Member Author

Luis will fill out the acceptance criteria on this ticket.

@thekaveman thekaveman moved this from Todo to Stretch in Digital Services Feb 5, 2025
@lalver1 lalver1 self-assigned this Feb 6, 2025
@lalver1 lalver1 linked a pull request Feb 6, 2025 that will close this issue
4 tasks
@thekaveman thekaveman moved this from Stretch to Todo in Digital Services Feb 10, 2025
@lalver1 lalver1 moved this from Todo to In review in Digital Services Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In review
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants