Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing options in fields #1423

Open
Matthew-MacLeod-gc opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Missing options in fields #1423

Matthew-MacLeod-gc opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Matthew-MacLeod-gc
Copy link

I am in the process of submitting two codesets supporting scientific journal papers, and have some feedback on the form fields:

  • None of the Category options feel like a good match to this kind of work. Options like "Scientific analysis" and/or "Data analysis" would be useful. As more and more journals require both data and code to be openly available, researchers and scientists will be producing more open code supporting - and often that code is reading in data, analyzing it, and producing figures for the paper.
  • R is not listed as a programming language
  • The form requires a 'French license URL' - my understanding is for most open source licenses (e.g., MIT, GPL), only the English language version is official, so not sure how to handle that. Should that field be optional?
@smellems
Copy link
Member

smellems commented Jul 29, 2021

Hi @Matthew-MacLeod-gc thanks for contributing to the ORE and providing feedback.

  • For the category, it's based on UNSPSC Software categories. Maybe "Educational or reference software"

  • For the programming language, you should be able to add it using the form. I think it's not listed because there are no project on the ORE using R.
    image

  • For the licenses it's true that OSS licenses are mostly English but some projects, like WET, provide a French translation of their license. Having it optional or an option to say that link is the same in French would be a good enhancement.

@Matthew-MacLeod-gc
Copy link
Author

Thanks for this. Our external relations folks will be filling out the form, and I suggested they fill in R, so that should handle that.

For the software categories, the ORE has categories for both 'code' and 'software,' although the forms are very similar. I would say what goes along with most scientific papers is 'code' rather than 'software,' so a different categorization may be helpful there. See e.g., the concept of 'reproducible research': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility#Reproducible_research - we're not aiming to produce a finished piece of software that performs a variety of functions, it's about allowing others to reproduce the results presented in a peer-reviewed paper.

@smellems
Copy link
Member

smellems commented Jul 29, 2021

The Code section on the ORE is for open source code developed and released by the GC or other Canadian public administrations.
ex.: WET, Apogy, ..

Software is for 3rd party open source software used by the GC or other Canadian public administrations.
ex.: Firefox, MySQL, ..

I think your entry should be in Code. But in the end, its all "software" for the category.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants