You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Urea data has been submitted with units of nM for cruise 49NZ20191229, but currently our parameters table only has UMOL/KG.
We decided to add Urea with units of NMOL/L (or UMOL/L) to the parameter table
I have been unable to find an instance where we have mixed SI prefixes (nano vs micro in this case). So I really hesitate to add NMOL units without making a decision about converting either the incoming data or all the existing data (like 5 cruises). Is the UMOL/L in parens a suggestion that we would be open to converting (by dividing by 1000) the incoming data?
I poke around NVS and UMOL units seem to be what they have for urea params. All of our existing data are in UMOL/KG so UMOL/L feels natural/correct, even if the numbers are small <1.
Urea data has been submitted with units of nM for cruise 49NZ20191229, but currently our parameters table only has UMOL/KG.
We decided to add Urea with units of NMOL/L (or UMOL/L) to the parameter table
Link to cruise with submitted data:
https://cchdo.ucsd.edu/cruise/49NZ20191229
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: