-
DescriptionIt looks like {
tokenTransferTxs(addressHash: "0xDE33e71fAECdEad20e6A8af8f362d2236CbA005f", first: 25) {
edges {
node {
transactionHash
blockNumber
timestamp
gasPrice
gasUsed
feeToken
gatewayFee
gatewayFeeRecipient
input
# Transfers associated with the TX
tokenTransfer(first: 30) {
edges {
node {
id
fromAddressHash
toAddressHash
fromAccountHash
toAccountHash
value
token
tokenAddress
tokenType
tokenId
}
}
}
}
}
}
} Response{
"node": {
"blockNumber": 19422610,
"feeToken": "CELO",
"gasPrice": "25000000000",
"gasUsed": "474849",
"gatewayFee": "0",
"gatewayFeeRecipient": null,
"input": "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",
"timestamp": "2023-05-22T18:48:06.000000Z",
"tokenTransfer": {
"edges": [
{
"node": {
"fromAccountHash": null,
"fromAddressHash": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"id": "Q2Vsb1RyYW5zZmVyOnsibG9nX2luZGV4Ijo4LCJ0cmFuc2FjdGlvbl9oYXNoIjoiMHg1MmUwZjQyYTQxYTFjZmZkNDc0MGM1ZDMxNTMyMDYyOWRmMzcyNTE2MGJhNTc2OTQyODZhYWQ2NjhkMTRhNGIzIn0=",
"toAccountHash": "0xde33e71faecdead20e6a8af8f362d2236cba005f",
"toAddressHash": "0xde33e71faecdead20e6a8af8f362d2236cba005f",
"token": "CDN",
"tokenAddress": "0x376f5039df4e9e9c864185d8fabad4f04a7e394a",
"tokenId": null,
"tokenType": "ERC-721",
"value": null
}
}
]
},
"transactionHash": "0x52e0f42a41a1cffd4740c5d315320629df3725160ba57694286aad668d14a4b3"
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments
-
This issue is still persisting as of Fri, Jun 9 11:50 (UTC). Reproduce bug: I tested the query above using GraphiQL in the browser: https://explorer.celo.org/mainnet/graphiql Result: (Note: I had to modify the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update (Mon, Jul 12)TLDR
More detailsA simplified overview of the root cause is that:
The fix for the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Update (Tues, Jul 12) - resolvedThe fix for missing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Update (Tues, Jul 12) - resolved
The fix for missing
token_id
was deployed today. It is backward-compatible, so no changes are necessary in the queries themselves. GraphQL responses once again contain the expectedtoken_id
values, and this issue is considered resolved.