Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TECH DEPT: Remove send to parliament related parts from API code #233

Open
4 tasks
ilmartyrk opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 4 comments
Open
4 tasks

TECH DEPT: Remove send to parliament related parts from API code #233

ilmartyrk opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Existing feature not working as designed.

Comments

@ilmartyrk
Copy link
Member

As sending e-mails to parliament was RAA specific solution and the part of code that executed this feature got removed, code needs a little cleanup. #77

  • Remove redundant tests
  • Remove config items not used anymore
  • Remove e-mail templates
  • Check if anything else needs to be removed
@ilmartyrk ilmartyrk added the bug Existing feature not working as designed. label Feb 3, 2022
@anettlinno
Copy link
Collaborator

Triage 60. Code cleanup. Est. cleanup time 30 min. Sending to development.

@loorm
Copy link
Member

loorm commented Mar 7, 2022

Just an idea, but since RAA has almost no collaborative features (aside from comments), perhaps instead of pruning this off of Citizen OS, we include it as a full-fledged feature. So that if you want to actually have a collaborative decision-making process and then send it to the Parliament, you can. RAA holds no monopoly over sending issues to the Parliament. Anyone can do it.

@anettlinno
Copy link
Collaborator

Just an idea, but since RAA has almost no collaborative features (aside from comments), perhaps instead of pruning this off of Citizen OS, we include it as a full-fledged feature. So that if you want to actually have a collaborative decision-making process and then send it to the Parliament, you can. RAA holds no monopoly over sending issues to the Parliament. Anyone can do it.

Very much agree. One more thing that RAA is missing is the opportunity to make balanced voting. By that I mean that in RAA you can only support the topic, no matter how the question or statement is raised. That is causing petitions where one group is gathering support to "We support the continuation of Kersti Kaljulaid as President" https://rahvaalgatus.ee/initiatives/2fba409c-0030-490f-9fd5-52802777370d and other group to "We do not support the continuation of Kersti Kaljulaid as President" https://rahvaalgatus.ee/initiatives/c02ecd57-2ea6-487a-bebf-d6bd4aea857e
Our platform enables to ask in one topic what is the real opinion of people (either they support or do not support continuation of Kersti Kaljulaid as President). IMHO this system is much more democratic :)

Downside is that as this feature is usable only in Estonia (at least at that moment) and RAA is more used for petitions, we would create this only for a very small amount of people. AND people can still initiate petitions via COS and send it to the Pariament through other channel

@BeccaMelhuish
Copy link
Contributor

@ilmartyrk will assume OK to go to 'later' as is an old, dormant issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Existing feature not working as designed.
Projects
Status: Backlog - Later
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants