@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ A `cnb-shim-builder` repository will be added to the Application Runtime
152
152
Interfaces working group. This repository will contain the tooling necessary
153
153
for converting existing Paketo buildpacks into shimmed CNBs.
154
154
155
- The shimmed buildpacks will be experimental bosh releases, belonging to the
155
+ The shimmed buildpacks will be experimental BOSH releases, belonging to the
156
156
Application Runtime Interfaces working group. The proposed list of buildpacks
157
157
is as follows (in rough priority order):
158
158
1 . ` java_native_cnb_release `
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ is as follows (in rough priority order):
171
171
It is not required to shim all buildpacks during phase 1 of this project.
172
172
Depending on the effort to shim buildpacks and other factors, it may make sense
173
173
to move to native CNB support before all Paketo buildpacks are shimmed. During
174
- phase 2, the above bosh release repositories will be converted to unshimmed
175
- bosh releases of the corresponding Paketo buildpacks.
174
+ phase 2, the above BOSH release repositories will be converted to unshimmed
175
+ BOSH releases of the corresponding Paketo buildpacks.
176
176
177
177
The CNBs will initially be opt-in for CF Deployment operators via an
178
178
experimental ops file. Once the buildpacks have reached a suitable level of
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ease development and adoption. Paketo provides [multiple stacks](https://paketo.
186
186
that are compatible with the Paketo buildpacks. There is an opportunity to
187
187
adopt some or all of the Paketo stacks into CF Deployment, in addition to the
188
188
buildpacks. The Paketo buildpacks have greater cohesion with the Paketo
189
- buildpacks than with ` cflinuxfs4 ` , and the Paketo "base" and "tiny" stacks could
189
+ stacks than with ` cflinuxfs4 ` , and the Paketo "base" and "tiny" stacks could
190
190
offer security-conscious CF Deployment users stacks with fewer native
191
191
dependencies than are currently included with ` cflinuxfs4 ` . This RFC does not
192
192
cover the adoption of additional stacks into CF Deployment, but it does open
0 commit comments