Replies: 4 comments 4 replies
-
@brandonkelly: We often have the same problem. Readding the option to add groups to the fields and entry types would be very useful. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For now, I resorted to "grouping" entry types by adding colors and prefixing the names. Both are far from ideal because they're visible to the authors. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is becoming an issue for us as well. We have fewer fields in Craft 5 than we did in Craft 4, but grouping entry types would be a big improvement! It would be great if we could group entry types in the CP and even better if we could group them within the matrix field "add" button dropdown. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just another thought on how to simulate grouping entry types: Add a prefix to the handle and order them by handle. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
IMO we need to be able to group fields and entry types in the CP.
Currently, if I go to
cp/settings/entry-types
I get a list all entry types, those for entries and those for matrix fields all mixed together. It is very confusing.Same goes for
cp/settings/fields
.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions