-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Spike] Evaluate using krunkit
instead of vfkit
without codebase changes
#4341
Comments
There are also versioning differences ( For ease of testing, the ideal situation would be if we could just do |
We could also consider changing how we deal with this, podman uses the |
Major differences between
|
|
@cfergeau this we can do as part of snc bundle right? |
If this works as expected, yes we could add it to |
Thta would be a different issue. This spike is concluded. Can we close it? |
This is a follow-up issue to the spike #4233. This issue will be used to track the following:
krunkit
andvfkit
krunkit
is being used instead ofvfkit
so that we skip the 'timesync' configuration(which does not work with krunkit)krunkit
can be integrated alongsidevfkit
without altering the existing codebaseThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: