-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(application): Add support for Kustomize Patches #210
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(application): Add support for Kustomize Patches #210
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Steven Borrelli <[email protected]>
I'm a little unsure of the goverter conversions, there are a few fields missing that I have commented out. |
@stevendborrelli which fields are you uncertain about? https://github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/blob/d408909df6f950dd4b1a0b898c3b77259aef394f/pkg/apis/application/v1alpha1/types.go#L521 |
Signed-off-by: Steven Borrelli <[email protected]>
@blakepettersson There are new fields I was pulling from main that aren't in the last release. I've removed them in commit: 966a5ae. |
@janwillies @MisterMX could we get a review of this? |
Thanks for the PR @stevendborrelli! Changes look good to me, figuring out why the linter fails |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me so far. I don't see any major issues - I haven't tested it by myself, though.
go 1.21.0 | ||
|
||
toolchain go1.23.2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets leave the go version as it is as long no upgrades are necessary.
Description of your changes
Fixes #208
I have:
RunIt looks like linting is broken in the Makefile.make reviewable test
to ensure this PR is ready for review.How has this code been tested
We've tested this successfully internally, also confirmed by comment #208 (comment).